Found in 287 of 352 platforms tracked (82% adoption) · 4261 provisions
This clause eliminates a refund remedy for a specific category of processing failure that 23andMe characterizes as a known possibility.
This clause explicitly excludes current health assessment and medical decision-making — including medication decisions — from the intended scope of the Services.
The complete absence of any warranty, guarantee, or condition means the reader has no contractual assurance about the quality, fitness, accuracy, or reliability of the AI21 Materials.
A five-dollar ceiling on all combined liability effectively eliminates any meaningful monetary recovery for losses sustained under the Agreement, regardless of their magnitude.
Excluding these categories of damages means that losses flowing from AI21 Labs' actions — such as lost profits, lost data, or amplified harm — cannot be recovered under the Agreement.
This disclaimer removes AI21 Labs from any accountability for how third-party services collect, use, or expose your personal data.
A $100 ceiling on AT&T's aggregate liability means that even if a user suffers significant harm, AT&T's financial exposure is contractually capped at that amount under the covered circumstances.
AT&T disclaims liability even for its own conduct under the provision and for account security breaches, meaning users cannot hold AT&T responsible for those specific harms.
This clause eliminates AT&T's financial responsibility across virtually every recognized category of damages, leaving users without a contractual remedy for most harms.
Providing the Site on an 'as is' and 'as available' basis signals a disclaimer of warranties, meaning AT&T makes no guarantees about the quality, reliability, or fitness of the Site or its content.
The cap limits the maximum financial exposure of both parties to a backward-looking 12-month fee figure tied to the specific Services involved, which may be far lower than actual damages suffered.
By carving out Section 50.10 obligations from the Agreement's damages cap, this clause means AWS Bedrock's financial exposure for those defense and payment duties is not limited, which significantly …
This exclusion covers virtually every category of damages a user might seek, including direct damages, which is unusually broad and severely limits any financial remedy available against Acorns.
The "as is" and "with all faults" disclaimer signals that Acorns makes no representations about the quality or fitness of its Site or Application, which typically accompanies a broader disclaimer of …
Users who have paid nothing receive no monetary recovery from ActiveCampaign regardless of the nature or severity of any claim, and paying users are capped at their paid amount.
Users have no warranty protections for the Services, meaning ActiveCampaign makes no legally binding assurances about the Services' quality, suitability, or freedom from infringement.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most commonly awarded for significant harm—such as lost profits, lost data, or pain and suffering—leaving users limited to direct damages only.
For users who paid little or nothing in the relevant twelve-month period, this cap could reduce Activision's liability to near zero regardless of the extent of harm.
The disclaimer removes standard legal protections users might otherwise rely on regarding the quality, fitness, and legality of the Services and Software, subject only to mandatory legal limits and a…
This exclusion removes categories of damages that are often the most significant in practice—such as lost profits or data loss—leaving users with a substantially narrowed set of recoverable losses.
The cap ties maximum recoverable damages to a backward-looking fee figure, which may be substantially lower than actual losses suffered by the Merchant in a given year.
This sweeping exclusion of liability covers virtually all categories of damages a user might seek, including direct and consequential losses, significantly limiting recourse against Affirm.
The exclusion covers a broad range of harm categories — including personal injury and all forms of consequential damages — which substantially limits the types of losses a user can recover from After…
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Afterpay regardless of the nature or scale of the harm, which constrains the practical value of any legal claim against Afterpay.
A total warranty disclaimer means users have no contractual assurance from Airbnb about the quality, accuracy, or fitness of the platform or its content.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of damages that are often the largest in practice—lost profits, data loss, or downstream harms—leaving users with a significantly narrowed basis for recovery.
This cap limits the maximum recovery a Guest can obtain from Airbnb to their own historical payments, which may be far less than the actual harm suffered.
Requiring assumption of the entire risk—including risks as severe as death—substantially limits a Guest's ability to hold Airbnb responsible for harms arising from platform use.
Users are barred from recovering any category of damages from Amazon in connection with use of Amazon Services, including damages that would ordinarily be recoverable at law.
Users cannot rely on any warranty protection regarding Amazon Services; all implied and express warranties are disclaimed, eliminating standard consumer warranty remedies.
The clause eliminates the most common categories of substantial damages an associate might seek, including lost profits and lost revenue, effectively limiting recovery to direct damages only.
The cap confines the maximum recoverable amount to a backward-looking, twelve-month window of commission income, which may be substantially less than actual losses suffered.
American Airlines has disclaimed liability for a specific and common form of account compromise — password theft — meaning users bear the consequence of such unauthorized access.
The liability cap establishes the maximum financial exposure American Airlines accepts for baggage-related losses on domestic flights, while the categorical exclusions for certain item types create d…
The liability caps define the maximum financial exposure American Airlines assumes for loss, damage, or delay of checked baggage on international routes. The applicable cap depends on which internati…
American Airlines has expressly disclaimed all warranties regarding the protection of your information, meaning it accepts no warranty-based liability if your data is accessed, used, or released cont…
Regardless of the scale of harm a customer suffers, the maximum monetary recovery from Amplitude for any and all claims under the Terms is $1,000.
Customers cannot recover from Amplitude or its affiliates for the categories of harm most commonly associated with service failures, including lost profits, lost revenue, lost goodwill, and all indir…
Customers have no contractual warranty to rely on if the Services fail, contain errors, or do not meet their needs, limiting any warranty-based claims.
This disclaimer means that, outside of legally mandated liability, users bear the consequences of data breaches, theft, destruction, loss, or inadvertent disclosure without recourse against Amplitude.
Disclaiming all express and implied warranties to the maximum extent permitted by law means users have no contractual basis to claim the Services will function in any particular way or meet any stand…
No matter the severity of a claim, Ancestry's maximum financial exposure to a user is bounded by that user's prior 12 months of payments, which may be zero for free-tier users.
The clause purports to eliminate Anthropic's and its affiliates' financial liability across virtually every recognized category of damages, significantly limiting users' legal recourse.
This exclusion eliminates categories of damages that often represent the largest share of real-world losses, such as lost profits or data loss, leaving users with very limited recourse.
The exclusion covers nearly every recognized category of damages—including direct damages—leaving users with extremely limited grounds to recover losses attributable to the Services.
The claim establishes that Anthropic bears no responsibility for third-party data practices, meaning users have no recourse against Anthropic for how those services collect, use, or share their data.
The cap means that regardless of the severity of harm, Anthropic's maximum financial exposure to any individual user is strictly bounded by a formula that may yield as little as $100.
The absence of any warranty means users have no contractual assurance about the quality, fitness, reliability, or accuracy of the Services, Outputs, or Actions.
The absence of warranties means Anthropic makes no guarantees about the quality, accuracy, fitness, or reliability of its Services, Outputs, or Actions, leaving users with no contractual basis for qu…
The cap means that regardless of the harm suffered, recoverable damages are bounded by a small dollar amount tied to recent fee payments, which may be far less than actual losses.
This disclaimer means users have no recourse against Anthropic for how Third-Party Services collect, use, or share data, even when those services are accessed through or in connection with Anthropic'…
Anthropic disclaims all warranties regarding the Services, Outputs, and Actions, meaning users have no contractual guarantee of quality, fitness, or reliability, subject only to limits imposed by app…
A $250.00 ceiling on total damages substantially limits a user's ability to recover losses from the Licensor regardless of the magnitude of actual harm.
A $100 aggregate cap means that even significant harm to the user results in a maximum recovery of $100 from Asana.
Where Atlassian's customers control how data is handled, users may not be protected by Atlassian's privacy standards, and Atlassian accepts no liability for those gaps.
By disclaiming all warranties beyond those expressly stated, Atlassian eliminates default legal protections that would otherwise arise by operation of law, leaving the customer without recourse based…
The cap limits the maximum financial exposure of both parties under the Agreement to a backward-looking twelve-month fee figure tied to the specific products at issue, which may be substantially less…
An 'as is' and 'as available' provision signals that Okta makes no commitments regarding the condition, reliability, or availability of the Site or its contents.
The clause eliminates Okta's financial exposure across every recognized category of damages arising from Site use, leaving users with no damages remedy against Okta in those circumstances.
By disclaiming all implied warranties, Okta removes standard legal protections users would otherwise have regarding the quality, suitability, and non-infringing character of the service.
This clause explicitly disclaims any guarantee of absolute data security, limiting Baseten's liability exposure for data breaches or unauthorized access.
The cap ties maximum recovery to a backward-looking fee calculation, which may be substantially lower than actual damages, particularly for customers with low or short payment histories.
By disclaiming all implied warranties, Baseten removes legally implied quality and fitness assurances that would otherwise attach by default, leaving the customer without those protections.
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of typically significant commercial damages, meaning even substantial downstream losses caused by service failures may be unrecoverable from Baseten.
The limitation applies to a broad set of entities associated with BeReal, and its practical ceiling is determined entirely by the user's local law rather than a fixed contractual cap.
An 'as is' and 'as available' disclaimer signals that Best Buy does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or availability of its properties or content.
This exclusion limits the financial recovery users can seek from Best Buy for harm resulting from use of its properties, removing categories of damages that are often the most significant.
Best Buy explicitly disclaims any guarantee of data security, placing the risk of a data breach or unauthorized access outside the scope of any security commitment by Best Buy.
The exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most likely to be significant in financial services disputes, leaving users with a narrow base of potentially recoverable direct losses.
Regardless of the magnitude of actual harm, users and third parties can recover no more than $10,000 from Binance.US, which may be far less than the value of assets or losses at stake in a dispute.
The explicit disclaimer of guarantees means Bluesky accepts no absolute security obligation, limiting users' ability to rely on the platform's safeguards as a guarantee of data protection.
By disclaiming all warranties to the fullest extent permitted by law, Bluesky removes the baseline quality and fitness assurances that would otherwise apply to its service by default under law.
A US$100 cumulative cap means that regardless of the scale or number of harms a user suffers, Bluesky's maximum financial exposure to that user is US$100, except for carved-out claim types.
This exclusion eliminates some of the most significant categories of recoverable damages, meaning users cannot recover losses that flow indirectly from Bluesky's actions or failures even if those los…
Users may not be able to fully remove their content from the AT Protocol ecosystem even after requesting deletion, because Bluesky lacks the ability to compel third-party services to comply.
By disclaiming all warranties, Boston Dynamics eliminates any legal assurance about the reliability, suitability, or lawfulness of the Site and its content.
Regardless of the nature or magnitude of harm, users cannot recover more than US$100.00 from Boston Dynamics.
The exclusion eliminates recovery for the categories of damages most commonly associated with significant financial harm, including lost data, lost profits, and downstream losses.
The disclaimer eliminates any contractual quality guarantees, meaning users have no warranty-based recourse if the Services are defective, unavailable, or otherwise fail to meet expectations.
The cap severely restricts the maximum financial recovery a user could obtain from Box regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered.
The cap ties the maximum recoverable amount to historical fee payments, which may be very low or zero for readers who paid little or nothing in fees, substantially limiting recoverable damages.
By acknowledging that consumer protection laws do not apply, the reader accepts that legal protections available to individual consumers—including dispute rights under laws like Regulation E—are unav…
The exclusion covers a wide range of damage categories, including lost profits and physical injury, substantially limiting the types of harm for which the reader can seek compensation from Brex.
The $100 cap functions as a fallback ceiling on all recoverable damages from Bumble, ensuring that even when a broader liability exclusion fails legally, Bumble's maximum financial exposure remains $…
This exclusion eliminates virtually all categories of legal damages a user might otherwise seek, including losses that could be substantial such as loss of income, data, or goodwill.
Users cannot recover for a broad range of losses—such as lost profits, business disruption, or data loss—that are typically the most significant damages in a real-world harm scenario.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Calendly regardless of the nature or scale of the harm suffered, which may be far less than actual damages.
Users have no warranty protections for the Services, meaning Calm bears no contractual obligation to ensure the Services meet any particular standard of quality or suitability.
Users cannot recover consequential or incidental damages from Calm or its partners regardless of the nature or cause of harm suffered.
Regardless of the harm suffered, users can recover no more than the greater of their payments to Calm or $50, which may be far less than actual damages.
Canva explicitly disclaims security assurances, meaning users bear the risk that their transmitted or stored information could be compromised without Canva being in breach of any warranty.
Regardless of the severity of harm, the maximum amount either party can recover is capped at a low dollar figure, which significantly restricts the user's ability to obtain full compensation.
For users who pay little or no fees to Cash App, the liability cap may default to $500 regardless of the magnitude of harm, limiting potential recovery in disputes.
For users who pay little or nothing, the effective cap on all recoverable damages is $100, regardless of the magnitude of harm.
This exclusion covers both indirect and direct damages across all damage categories, meaning users may have no monetary remedy for losses arising from service access or failure.
Chase explicitly declines to warrant the security of electronic transmissions, which bears on user risk when sending sensitive information through unsecured channels.
By excluding liability under every recognised legal theory and even for foreseeable harm, Checkout.com removes all avenues for users to claim compensation for website-related losses.
This exclusion removes liability for the most financially significant categories of loss a business could suffer, leaving companies with limited recourse even where Checkout.com's actions caused the …
Regardless of the severity or number of claims, total recoverable damages from the Chegg Parties are capped at a fixed ceiling, which may be as low as $250 for users who have paid nothing.
Chegg explicitly declines to guarantee security, meaning readers bear the residual risk of data exposure despite the commercially reasonable measures Chegg takes.
This exclusion eliminates recovery for the categories of harm most commonly associated with service failures, such as lost opportunities or downstream financial loss.
By setting intentional misconduct as the compliance standard, ClickUp limits liability for data protection failures to those involving intentional wrongdoing, excluding negligence or lesser failures …
The comprehensive scope of excluded damage types means the reader has no enforceable damages claim against ClickUp across virtually all categories of harm.
A full warranty disclaimer means ClickUp makes no enforceable promise about the Service's quality, fitness, or reliability.
This cap means that no matter how significant the harm, the maximum financial recovery from Cloudflare is bounded by a single year of the user's own payments, which could be zero for free-tier users.
This exclusion removes entire categories of damages—often the largest in a dispute—from any claim a user or third party could bring against Cloudflare relating to Service use.
The exclusion covers every standard category of damages, including direct damages, which is an unusually broad exclusion that eliminates nearly all avenues for financial recovery.
The disclaimer eliminates all warranty-based legal protections a user might otherwise rely on regarding the quality, fitness, or reliability of the Cohere Solution and Services.
The cap means that regardless of the scale of harm suffered, the maximum financial recovery from Cohere under these terms is $100 CAD.
Customers using Beta Services bear all risk of harm with no contractual recourse against Cohere, except where law prevents such exclusion.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to either party regardless of the severity of harm, tying the ceiling directly to recent fees paid.
This exclusion removes the most common categories of large-scale loss from any claim either party might bring, significantly limiting practical recovery even when harm is substantial.
Without FDIC or SIPC coverage, users bear the full risk of loss of their Digital Assets without the safety net that applies to traditional bank deposits or brokerage accounts.
The cap ties the maximum recoverable amount to wallet value at the moment of the triggering event, which may be significantly less than losses actually suffered, especially in a volatile market.
The exclusion covers a wide range of harms that are commonly associated with platform failures, security incidents, or service disruptions, leaving users without recourse for these categories of loss.
The exclusion covers every standard category of damages, including direct damages, meaning customers may have no monetary recourse against Comcast or the Released Entities regardless of the nature of…
This clause limits Copy.ai's legal exposure for unauthorized data disclosures, with the disclaimer operative only up to the ceiling set by applicable law.
The cap means that no matter how serious the harm or how many claims arise, Coursera's total financial exposure to a user is severely limited, potentially to just $20.
This exclusion eliminates a broad range of damages users might otherwise seek, meaning that harms flowing from Coursera's actions that are not direct and immediate losses cannot be recovered.
The cap applies to all loss categories including direct and punitive losses, severely restricting the maximum recovery a user can obtain from CL Entities regardless of harm suffered.
This disclaimer removes Cursor's liability for security or privacy failures resulting from circumvention, including on third-party sites linked from the Service.
This provision establishes the operational framework for service availability, specifying that the provider retains unilateral authority to alter service scope and that such changes operate without c…
This provision allocates all risk from automatically executed AI-generated code to the user, including system outages, data loss, and security vulnerabilities, which is operationally significant for …
By disclaiming all warranties, Databricks assumes no legal responsibility for the quality, accuracy, fitness, or reliability of the Sites or Content, leaving users without warranty-based recourse.
Excluding this entire category of damages means users cannot recover for losses such as lost profits, lost data, or downstream harm, regardless of how those losses arise.
A hard $100.00 aggregate cap, unbreakable by multiple claims, means users are effectively unable to recover meaningful compensation for losses arising from their use of the Sites.
The $200 aggregate cap applies to all claims combined under the Terms, meaning users cannot recover more than that amount from Datadog regardless of the nature or extent of harm suffered.
The complete disclaimer of warranties means users cannot rely on any guarantee of quality, fitness, accuracy, or availability with respect to the Site or its content.
The cap directly limits the maximum financial recovery available to either party regardless of the magnitude of actual harm suffered.
The mutual exclusion eliminates entire categories of loss that are often the most financially significant in practice, capping recoverable harm to direct losses only.
By excluding every named category of damages, the clause leaves users without a contractual remedy against DeepSeek for virtually any harm connected to the Model or the License.
An absolute disclaimer of liability across all legal theories and all types of damages means users bear full risk of any harm arising from the Software with no recourse against the authors or copyrig…
The complete disclaimer of all warranties, including the three named implied warranties, means users receive no assurance about the Software's quality, suitability, or non-infringement of third-party…
Users cannot rely on Delta Airlines having warranted that site information is complete or accurate, which limits any claim based on such reliance.
Users who incur hotel costs or incidental expenses in circumstances connected to Delta Airlines cannot recover those costs from Delta Airlines.
Users who are harmed by site access issues or by acting on information found on the site have no recourse against Delta Airlines for those damages or injuries.
Users who suffer harm in connection with third-party services arranged through or associated with Delta Airlines cannot hold Delta Airlines liable for that harm.
The exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most likely to reflect real-world harm from service failures — lost data, lost revenue, and consequential losses — leaving only direct damages poten…
The cap means that regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, Descript's maximum financial exposure is either $10.00 or the fees paid — which for free-tier users is exactly $10.00.
Even where Discord is found liable, the maximum recoverable amount is tightly capped, which is consequential for users who have paid little or nothing.
This exclusion removes liability for many of the most significant categories of harm users may suffer, leaving a narrow set of damages recoverable.
Regardless of the magnitude of harm a user suffers, Disney+'s financial exposure is capped at $1,000, which may be substantially less than actual damages.
The disclaimer removes standard legal protections users would otherwise have regarding the quality, suitability, and performance of the services and content.
Users who connect third-party integrations have no recourse against DocuSign for data handling that occurs outside DocuSign's own platform, shifting all responsibility to the third party.
The liability cap means that regardless of the magnitude of harm, DocuSign's financial exposure to any individual user is limited to a relatively small amount, potentially as low as $100.
DoorDash explicitly disclaims the ability to guarantee absolute security, which limits the assurance users can rely on regarding the protection of their Personal Information.
This cap means that no matter how significant a harm DoorDash causes, the maximum recoverable amount is tied to the user's own recent payment history with DoorDash, which may be very low or zero.
DoorDash expressly shifts all liability for Merchant-originated communications away from itself and onto the Merchant, meaning users cannot hold DoorDash responsible for such communications.
The complete disclaimer of all warranties means users have no contractual guarantee regarding the quality, reliability, fitness, or performance of the Services.
For users on free or low-cost plans, the maximum recoverable amount from Dropbox is capped at $20 USD, which may be far below the value of losses suffered.
This exclusion eliminates a broad range of damages categories that would typically be the most significant losses a user could suffer, including lost data and lost business.
This clause eliminates virtually all categories of monetary recovery a user could seek from Dun & Bradstreet, including both economic and consequential losses, leaving users with very limited legal r…
By disclaiming all warranties, Dun & Bradstreet removes any implied assurances about service quality, fitness, or reliability, leaving users with no warranty-based recourse if services fail to meet e…
The cap applies to any cause of liability whatsoever, and users who paid little or nothing in the prior 12 months may have effectively no monetary recovery available against Duolingo.
By excluding these categories of damages, Duolingo limits users to direct damages only, which significantly reduces the total potential recovery available to users for most harms.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a customer can obtain from Egnyte regardless of the severity or number of claims, which could leave customers undercompensated for significant losses.
These disclaimers eliminate implied legal protections customers might otherwise rely on, meaning customers have no warranty recourse for downtime, errors, security breaches, or unsuitability.
Egnyte explicitly disclaims any guarantee of security, meaning users bear residual risk of unauthorized access or data breach despite protective measures being in place.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of loss most likely to be large in a real-world service failure, such as lost business profits or data, leaving customers without recourse for those harms.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from ElevenLabs for any claim, which may be significantly lower than actual damages suffered.
The exclusion covers a wide range of damages categories under every theory of liability, and the 'even if advised' language removes the ability to establish liability by showing ElevenLabs had prior …
By disclaiming all warranties, Epic Games removes any implied assurances about the quality, fitness, or reliability of its Licensed Products and in-game content.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from the Epic Parties regardless of the nature or extent of harm suffered.
The exclusion covers an unusually broad range of damage categories, including direct damages, which are typically recoverable even where consequential damages are excluded.
The cap ties the maximum recovery to actual payments for the specific Products involved, which could be very low or zero for free products, and is further limited to the preceding twelve months.
By disclaiming all warranties, Eufy removes standard legal protections that would otherwise apply, leaving users with no warranty-based recourse regarding the Services.
This exclusion removes liability for the categories of damages that are often the largest in value, limiting users to direct damages only.
By assuming all risk, users forgo the ability to claim that Eufy should bear responsibility for harms arising from use of the Services.
Attendees surrender the right to sue for serious harms—including death—arising at Eventbrite-hosted events before any injury occurs.
Once Personal Data passes to Organizers or further downstream parties, Eventbrite bears no stated responsibility for how those parties handle it, limiting users' recourse against Eventbrite for third…
Users receive no warranty protection of any kind for anything obtained from the site, eliminating standard legal protections that might otherwise apply.
This exclusion eliminates all monetary recourse against Experian for any harm a user suffers in connection with the website, regardless of the type of damage.
Users cannot rely on any representation by Experian that its information, products, or services are correct, complete, accurate, timely, or fit for any specific purpose.
The exclusion covers a broad category of damages typically associated with significant losses, and extends beyond Faire to all parties involved in creating or delivering the Services.
Users have no contractual warranty protection for the Services or Collective Content, and Faire has affirmatively disclaimed the implied warranties most commonly available under law.
The US$100 cap applies to all claims combined, meaning users cannot recover more than that amount from Faire regardless of the magnitude of their actual losses.
This clause is consequential because it places a ceiling on all recoverable damages from FanDuel regardless of the nature or severity of the harm, and that ceiling may be zero for users who paid noth…
This clause places the risk of data interception or loss during transmission on the user, which limits Fastly's liability for security failures that occur in transit.
The cap means the maximum recoverable amount is tied to past fees paid, which may be far less than the actual harm suffered by either party.
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of harm that are often the largest damages in a dispute, sharply limiting what the Subscriber can recover even when Fastly is at fault.
Users of Free Accounts receive no contractual assurance about the quality, reliability, or fitness of the service.
Free Account users are outside the Agreement's liability framework entirely, meaning even the protections in Section 13 do not apply to them.
By disclaiming all listed implied warranties, Figma removes baseline legal protections that would otherwise attach automatically under applicable law, reducing Customer's recourse if the service fail…
The clause sets contractual prerequisites for service use by conditioning access on both legal capacity and regulatory compliance, establishing that the agreement is enforceable only where users meet…
Organizations face full vicarious liability for all Org User conduct on the platform, which can include liability for unauthorized use, terms violations, or content policy breaches by any individual …
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Fitbit regardless of the nature or severity of harm, which may be far less than actual damages suffered.
This exclusion removes user recourse for some of the most common and significant harms that can arise from service failures, data loss, or interruptions.
This disclaimer removes any implied or express quality guarantees, leaving the Customer with no contractual warranty protection for the Services or Documentation.
This exclusion eliminates the Customer's ability to recover categories of damages that often represent the largest share of actual harm, such as lost profits and consequential losses.
This clause is a direct disclaimer of any absolute security guarantee, meaning users bear the residual risk of data exposure that security measures cannot eliminate.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a Customer can obtain from Fly.io regardless of the magnitude of actual harm suffered.
By disclaiming these warranties, GOAT eliminates standard implied legal protections that users might otherwise rely on when purchasing or using products or services.
This exclusion eliminates the most common and significant categories of damages a user might seek to recover, substantially limiting available remedies.
By characterising the output as an estimation, Garmin limits the precision users can expect, which is consequential for any reliance placed on SpO2% readings.
By attributing inaccuracy to inherent technology limitations, Garmin establishes that heart rate reading errors are an expected possibility rather than an exceptional failure.
This disclaimer explicitly removes any medical-use expectation from the skin temperature feature, limiting the purposes for which users can legitimately rely on its data.
This establishes a baseline accuracy disclaimer for all wearable data, limiting the precision users can expect across any tracked metric.
This disclaimer explicitly removes any medical-use expectation from Pulse Ox data, which is significant given that blood oxygen readings may be associated with serious health conditions.
This establishes the broadest categorical disclaimer across all Garmin wearables, removing any medical-device status or medical-use expectation from the entire product line.
This disclaimer explicitly removes any medical-use expectation from heart rate monitor data, which is significant given that users may rely on such data for health decisions.
This exclusion removes categories of damages that are often the most significant in practice, limiting users' ability to recover for losses that flow from Geico's site even if those losses are substa…
The total disclaimer of all warranties, including implied ones, means users have no warranty-based recourse if the site or its content is inaccurate, unavailable, or unfit for their intended use.
Gemini's express disclaimer of absolute security establishes a ceiling on the security assurance users may rely upon.
The disclaimer eliminates all warranty protections a user might otherwise have regarding the Web site's fitness, accuracy, or reliability, subject only to what law prohibits from being disclaimed.
Users give up the ability to pursue GM legally or in equity over objectionable content submitted by other users, and additionally take on an obligation to indemnify GM in connection with such content.
The clause eliminates all categories of monetary damages a user could seek from General Motors or its associated entities, covering the full spectrum from direct to consequential harm.
The exclusion covers a wide range of harm categories and applies to third parties as well as users, substantially limiting recourse for significant losses connected to GitHub's service.
This clause places the full burden of responsibility for code—including AI-generated Suggestions—on the user, not on GitHub, regardless of how the Suggestions were used.
Regardless of the nature or magnitude of harm a user suffers in connection with the services, Glassdoor's financial exposure is capped at $100, making meaningful monetary recovery effectively unavail…
Despite features suggesting anonymity, Glassdoor explicitly disclaims any guarantee of it, meaning users who post sensitive information — such as workplace reviews — may be identifiable to employers …
This disclaimer limits any expectation of absolute data security, signaling that Glean does not warrant complete protection of transmitted or stored data.
By disclaiming all implied and statutory warranties to the fullest extent permitted by law, Google eliminates default legal protections a user might otherwise rely on.
Users have no warranty protections from Google regarding the quality, suitability, or non-infringing nature of its services, to the extent the law permits such a disclaimer.
Users cannot recover the most commonly significant categories of loss from Google, regardless of the nature or severity of harm suffered.
Regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, users can recover no more than $200 or their prior 12 months of fees from Google, whichever is greater.
A $500 aggregate ceiling means that regardless of the scale of harm suffered, the maximum financial recovery from Google under this agreement is $500.
This exclusion removes Google's liability for the categories of harm most likely to be significant in practice—lost revenue and downstream financial consequences—regardless of whether Google had prio…
This clause removes Google's liability for any third-party tags, placing all associated risk with the user or the third party.
The complete absence of any guarantee or warranty for hardware-specific performance and safety leaves the developer with no contractual remedy if the Robotics Models perform unsafely with their hardw…
By placing transactions solely between user and merchant, Google and its affiliates are expressly excluded as transaction parties, which affects where users must direct contractual claims or disputes…
By disclaiming both processing and control, Google positions itself outside the transaction chain for these instruments, which directly affects where users must direct disputes about funds, refunds, …
The clause removes Google Ads' data protection obligations for any Customer Personal Data the Customer moves outside Google's and its Subprocessors' controlled environments, placing full responsibili…
A full disclaimer of implied warranties means customers cannot rely on Google Cloud's services meeting any implied standard of quality, suitability, or freedom from infringement beyond what is explic…
It establishes that despite Gemini acting autonomously on a user's behalf, the legal and practical responsibility for those actions rests with the user, not with Google.
By disclaiming all warranties, Google Maps eliminates implied quality and fitness guarantees that would otherwise attach by default under law, leaving the Customer with no warranty-based recourse.
By excluding the most common categories of consequential and economic loss, the clause substantially narrows the types of harm either party can recover, regardless of how serious the breach or harm m…
The cap ties maximum recoverable damages to recent fee payments, which may be far below the actual harm suffered, limiting meaningful financial recourse for either party.
Users cannot rely on Google Pay as a guarantee that their payment instruments are valid or that transactions will succeed, placing verification responsibility elsewhere.
Users cannot hold Google Pay accountable under the terms governing their payment instruments, because Google Pay has no legal relationship to those agreements except where it is the issuer.
Because Google and its affiliates are not parties to these transactions, users cannot pursue Google for disputes, obligations, or liabilities arising from Seller transactions.
This clause establishes that you do not have a guaranteed permanent right to access content you have paid for, and limits your legal remedies to a refund if Google removes that content.
This clause operationally allocates payment liability to a single designated account holder rather than distributing it among individual purchasers, and extends that liability to transactions initiat…
Free-subscription users face a $100 ceiling on any recovery from Superhuman regardless of the nature or extent of harm suffered.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of harm most likely to be significant in practice, including data loss and downstream financial harm, leaving users with little recoverable loss.
This cap directly limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Superhuman regardless of the nature or severity of the harm.
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of damages that users might otherwise seek, including consequential and punitive damages, regardless of the circumstances of the claim.
Users have no assurance that Third-Party Materials accessible through the Websites have been vetted by Groq for accuracy, legality, or safety.
This exclusion removes user remedies for the most common and significant categories of harm arising from service failures, data loss, or other platform-related injuries.
Groq assigns full downstream responsibility for AI-assisted conduct to the Customer and its users, removing Groq from liability for any consequences that arise from acting—or failing to act—on AI out…
A $100 liability cap means users cannot recover meaningful compensation from Groq for damages that may far exceed that amount, regardless of the severity or form of the claim.
An 'as is' and 'as available' provision signals the absence of warranties regarding the condition, reliability, or continuous availability of the Websites and their content.
Without any warranties, users have no contractual assurance of quality, fitness, accuracy, or reliability for any aspect of the Platform or Services.
The cap limits financial recovery from Grubhub to a small fixed ceiling regardless of the actual harm suffered, which could be far greater.
Users cannot recover from Grubhub for many categories of harm that may result from using the Services, including personal injury and emotional distress.
By disclaiming any agency or employment relationship, Grubhub positions itself as not legally responsible for the conduct of Delivery Partners.
An 'as is, as available, with all faults' disclaimer means Gumroad makes no guarantees about the Services' quality, reliability, or fitness, and the user bears the consequences of any deficiencies.
The cap means a user's potential recovery from Gumroad is severely limited regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered.
This exclusion eliminates Gusto's financial exposure for some of the most significant and common harms users may experience, such as lost business profits or lost data.
This clause removes Gusto's legal responsibility for the quality or correctness of AI-generated outputs, meaning users bear the risk of relying on those outputs.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to an Employer regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, tying recoverable amounts to a backward-looking six-month payment window.
This clause limits the maximum financial recovery either party can obtain from the other regardless of the nature or number of claims, which may be far below actual damages.
This clause sets a defined upper limit on Harvey AI's financial exposure for qualifying data breach claims, which may be lower than actual harm suffered.
Excluding these categories of damages significantly narrows the types of loss a user can recover, often excluding the largest and most significant harms that may result from a service failure.
This cap places an absolute ceiling on financial recovery from Headspace, regardless of the severity or nature of the harm suffered.
The liability cap is pegged to historical fees paid, which may be substantially lower than the actual damages a party suffers, limiting practical recovery.
This exclusion eliminates the broadest categories of damages that typically result from service failures, significantly limiting the practical recovery available to either party.
The cap of US $1,000 on Trial Services liability means customers have very limited financial recourse against Contentsquare for any harm arising during a trial period.
The complete disclaimer of all warranty types—express, implied, and statutory—removes standard legal protections users would otherwise have regarding the quality, accuracy, or fitness of Site content…
A one-year limitation period shorter than many statutory limitation periods, combined with a waiver of all rights in any forum, significantly restricts the window in which users can seek legal relief.
The release is triggered by use alone and is framed as covering all aspects of the Site with no stated exceptions, potentially eliminating user claims across a wide range of Site-related conduct.
The exclusion covers an unusually broad range of damage categories, including direct damages, which eliminates most conventional avenues for financial recovery from Hilton related to the Site.
If HIPAA does not apply, users cannot rely on federal health information privacy protections for their data shared with Hims & Hers, the Medical Groups, Providers, Labs, or Pharmacies.
Regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, users cannot recover more than $1,000 from Hims & Hers, and only for actual damages, not other categories of loss.
By disclaiming all warranties including implied statutory warranties, Hims & Hers removes default legal protections that would otherwise guarantee baseline quality or fitness of its products and serv…
Because Hinge caps its aggregate liability at amounts actually paid, users who paid nothing or paid little have correspondingly little or no monetary recovery available regardless of the nature of th…
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of damages that often represent the most significant financial harm to users, such as lost profits and consequential losses, leaving users with only direct…
The blanket disclaimer of all warranty types means users have no contractual assurance from Hinge about the quality, fitness, accuracy, or reliability of the Services, subject only to limits imposed …
The disclaimer limits consumer expectations of guaranteed security and signals that Home Depot does not warrant against data interception or breach during transmission.
This cap sets an absolute ceiling on recoverable damages, meaning losses exceeding twelve months of fees cannot be recovered regardless of how severe the harm is.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of damages that typically constitute the largest portion of losses in technology disputes, sharply limiting practical recovery.
The cap limits the maximum financial exposure of both parties regardless of the scale or severity of harm suffered, potentially leaving significant losses uncompensated.
The absence of an absolute security guarantee means users bear residual risk of data breach or disclosure despite Hugging Face's protective efforts.
This exclusion means that even significant real-world financial losses—such as lost profits or lost data—may be unrecoverable from either party, regardless of how they arose.
By disclaiming all categories of warranties, Hulu eliminates any legal quality or fitness guarantees that might otherwise apply by law or implication to the content and services.
The cap applies to all damages, losses, and causes of action in aggregate, meaning a user cannot recover more than $1,000 from Hulu regardless of the nature or number of claims.
By disclaiming all warranties to the fullest extent permitted by law, Hulu eliminates the standard legal protections users would otherwise have regarding the quality, fitness, or reliability of the S…
The cap applies across all damages, losses, and causes of action in aggregate, meaning a user cannot recover more than $1,000 from Hulu regardless of the number or severity of claims.
The cap means that regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Ideogram or its affiliates is bounded by a very low ceiling, often USD 100 for u…
The exclusion covers the categories of harm most likely to be significant in practice—lost profits, data loss, and consequential harm—leaving users with recovery limited to direct damages only.
This disclosure limits Ideogram's accountability for data intercepted in transit by putting users on notice that transmission security is not guaranteed.
Because the cap applies to any cause whatsoever, users cannot recover more than their paid fees regardless of the nature or severity of Impact's conduct.
Regardless of the nature or size of a claim, the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Indeed and its affiliates and licensors is limited to what the user paid or owed in the prior 12 mon…
Users have no warranty protections for the Site or its content, programs, features, or services, to the fullest extent the law allows, meaning they bear the risk of any defects or failures.
The cap means that even if a user suffers direct financial harm significantly exceeding $100, Inflection AI's maximum financial exposure for all such claims combined is $100.
This exclusion eliminates recovery for the categories of harm most likely to be significant in practice, such as lost business or lost data, leaving users limited to direct damages only.
The waiver and release covers all claims—not just negligence—arising from Unattended Delivery, subject only to the limit of what applicable law permits.
Regardless of the nature or number of claims, the maximum financial recovery from Instacart and the named parties is limited to the greater of $100 or amounts paid, which may be far less than actual …
This exclusion means that losses beyond direct damages—including physical injury damages—cannot be recovered from Instacart or the named parties under this clause.
The cap means that regardless of the magnitude of harm, Instacart's financial exposure is limited to a fixed floor of $100 or recent payments, which may be far less than actual damages.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of damages that often represent the largest component of harm, leaving users able to seek only direct damages if any remain available.
Intuit explicitly disclaims a warranty of complete security, meaning users cannot rely on a guarantee that their personal information will be fully protected against breach or unauthorized access.
The exclusion covers every standard category of damages, including direct damages, which eliminates most avenues for financial recovery against Kajabi or its suppliers.
The cap limits all recoverable amounts from Kajabi to a very low ceiling—potentially as little as $200—regardless of the magnitude of harm the user suffers.
A blanket disclaimer of all warranties means users have no contractual assurance that Khan Academy's services meet any standard of quality, fitness, or reliability.
Parents or guardians bear full liability for any actions taken by a child user on the platform, which could include content violations, damages, or indemnification obligations.
The cap means that no matter how significant a user's harm, Khan Academy's maximum financial exposure is limited to a small dollar amount, which for free-tier users defaults to $100.
Regardless of the severity of harm, Kick's financial exposure to any individual user is strictly limited, which may leave users significantly undercompensated for substantial losses.
This limits Kick's financial and legal exposure when users suffer harm attributable to their own failure to secure account credentials, up to the boundary of applicable law.
Disclaiming all warranties, including implied warranties of merchantability, means users have no contractual assurance about the quality, fitness, or reliability of the Service.
The $50.00 cap applies to all damages in aggregate, meaning users have extremely limited financial recourse regardless of the scale of harm arising from Kindle Software.
This exclusion eliminates the most significant categories of damages a customer might otherwise seek, restricting any recovery to direct damages only.
The six-month lookback cap means that regardless of the severity or number of claims, Klaviyo's maximum financial exposure is tightly bounded by a relatively short payment period.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most likely to be large in a technology dispute, meaning neither party can recover business losses, reputational harm, or ripple-effect damages.
The cap limits the maximum financial exposure either party can face regardless of the severity or number of claims, which in practice limits the Customer's potential recovery against LangChain to one…
Users may find that privacy rights they attempt to exercise are only partially honored, because legal obligations or service necessity can override full compliance.
This carve-out ensures that liability limitations in the conditions cannot be used to shield Global-e or its related entities from the most serious categories of harm.
If a customer loses their 24 words, Ledger cannot restore them, meaning loss of the recovery phrase may result in permanent loss of access to crypto assets.
This exclusion removes Ledger's liability for the categories of loss most commonly suffered in connection with product or service failures, including financial losses and data loss.
The claim establishes a financial ceiling on all recoverable damages from Leonardo AI, tying maximum recovery directly to fees already paid by the user.
By excluding all named categories of damages, LexisNexis eliminates virtually every form of monetary recovery a user might otherwise seek, including attorneys' fees.
This fallback cap ensures that even if the broader liability exclusion is struck down or rendered ineffective, LexisNexis's maximum financial exposure to any user remains $100.00.
By disclaiming all warranties, LexisNexis eliminates standard legal protections users would otherwise have regarding the quality, suitability, and non-infringing nature of the website and its content.
A breach of the Terms — even a minor one — can void insurance coverage entirely, leaving the user personally liable for the full cost of any damage incurred during that breach.
Excluding all warranties removes standard legal protections users would otherwise have regarding the quality, fitness, or reliability of Lime's services or products.
This limitation means that when permitted by law, users cannot recover a broad range of economic and consequential damages from Lime's Released Parties.
An express disclaimer of all warranties means Customer has no contractual warranty protection for the Services, related components, or information.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a Customer can obtain from Linear, regardless of the actual damages suffered, tying recovery to a backward-looking fee amount.
For most advertisers, the cap will be very low, significantly limiting the financial recovery available from LinkedIn regardless of the severity of any breach or harm.
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of damages that members would most likely seek to recover following a serious platform failure or breach, substantially narrowing any potential recovery.
Advertisers are contractually barred from seeking any other remedy—including monetary refunds or damages—for fee disputes arising from Invalid Activity or Technological Issues, and LinkedIn retains s…
This cap places a hard ceiling on any monetary recovery a member could obtain from LinkedIn, which may be far below actual losses suffered.
The cap means that regardless of the nature or magnitude of harm suffered, the maximum financial recovery from LlamaIndex is limited to the greater of actual payments made or $100.00, which may be fa…
This cap limits the maximum financial exposure of both parties, meaning customers cannot recover more than what they paid Loom in the prior twelve months, regardless of the magnitude of their actual …
By disclaiming all warranties not expressly stated, Loom eliminates the implied legal protections customers would otherwise receive by default under applicable law.
Users whose data is handled by Loom customers cannot rely on Loom's privacy policy for protection against those customers' divergent practices.
Users who interact with third-party services connected to Loom receive no privacy protections from Loom's policy for that third-party data handling.
This mutual waiver eliminates entire categories of damages that are often the most significant in a technology dispute, meaning neither party can recover these types of losses regardless of the other…
The exclusion covers many of the most significant categories of harm a customer might suffer, meaning the customer bears those losses even if caused by Luma AI or its partners.
The cap sets a strict ceiling on any financial recovery a customer can obtain, which may be far below the actual harm suffered.
Luma AI explicitly disclaims any guarantee of transmission security, meaning users bear the residual risk of interception or exposure during data transmission.
The clause eliminates entire categories of damages users might otherwise seek to recover, significantly limiting the monetary remedies available against Lyft.
This exclusion means that even where Mailchimp is at fault, users cannot recover damages for economic losses that flow indirectly from the breach, including lost profits, lost data, or lost business …
The cap ties the maximum recoverable amount to a single prior month's payment, which may be far below the actual harm suffered, and extends the cap to Mailchimp's third-party providers as well.
By disclaiming all warranties, Marqeta eliminates any implied assurances about the quality, reliability, or legality of its services, leaving Customer without those default legal protections.
The exclusion eliminates recovery for the categories of harm that most commonly arise from service failures—such as lost profits or downstream losses—regardless of Marqeta's foresight.
Marqeta has explicitly disclaimed any guarantee of complete security, meaning users bear residual risk of data exposure despite any security measures Marqeta implements.
Customer assumes full financial exposure for a broad range of Card-related losses, including fraud and chargebacks, with no allocation of that risk to Marqeta.
This exclusion removes the most common and potentially largest categories of damages a user might otherwise seek, significantly limiting any financial recovery against McDonald's.
Disclaiming all warranties means users have no contractual assurance about the quality, reliability, or suitability of the online services.
Excluding these categories of damages means users typically cannot recover for losses that flow indirectly from Medium's conduct, even if significant.
The absence of any express or implied warranty means users have no contractual assurance about the quality, reliability, or fitness of Medium's Services or content.
For users who pay little or nothing, this cap effectively limits recoverable damages to $50.00, regardless of the harm suffered.
Users bear the full financial risk of any losses resulting from unauthorized account access or use, with no recourse against Mercury regardless of the circumstances.
Regardless of the nature or magnitude of harm a user suffers, Mercury's financial exposure is contractually limited to $1,000.00, which may be far less than actual losses.
The complete disclaimer of all warranties means users have no contractual assurance that the Services will function as expected, be suitable for their needs, or not infringe third-party rights.
A complete disclaimer of all warranties means Meta provides no guarantee of quality, fitness, or performance for the Llama Materials or their outputs, leaving the licensee without warranty-based reco…
This exclusion eliminates a broad category of damages that often represent the largest potential losses in technology disputes, substantially limiting the licensee's ability to recover from Meta.
By disclaiming all warranties, Meta eliminates any legal guarantee as to the quality, accuracy, fitness, or ownership integrity of the Services and Outputs, leaving users with no warranty-based recou…
The cap means that no matter how significant the harm arising from access or use of Meta Products, Meta's maximum financial exposure is limited to $100 or twelve months of payments from the user, whi…
The release covers both known and unknown claims, meaning users relinquish rights to claims against Meta connected to third-party disputes even if those claims are not yet discovered.
By placing sole responsibility and all associated risk on the licensee, Meta ensures that any harm arising from use, redistribution, or reliance on outputs cannot be attributed to Meta.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Meta regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered.
This exclusion eliminates recovery for the categories of harm most likely to be significant in practice, such as business losses and data loss, regardless of their magnitude.
Users of mUSD bear the full risk of third-party compliance actions affecting their holdings, with no recourse against Consensys regardless of the nature or impact of the action.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to users regardless of the magnitude of actual harm suffered.
A full warranty disclaimer means users have no contractual warranty protections and cannot hold MetaMask to any implied or express quality or fitness standard.
This exclusion bars recovery for the most significant categories of economic harm that typically result from service failures, effectively limiting claims to direct damages only.
This cap defines the maximum financial recovery available regardless of the magnitude of actual loss, and designates direct damages as the exclusive remedy, foreclosing other forms of relief.
The total disclaimer of warranties eliminates any contractual assurance of quality, fitness, or reliability of the Services, leaving users with no warranty-based recourse against Microsoft or the lis…
Designating this as the user's exclusive remedy and capping direct damages at one month's fee or $10.00 substantially limits the financial recovery available for any covered loss or breach.
A complete disclaimer of all warranties, express and implied, means users have no contractual quality assurance for the Services and accept them in whatever condition they exist.
Eliminating all warranties, including title and non-infringement, means users have no contractual guarantee that the Assets they receive are free of third-party intellectual property claims.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Midjourney, regardless of the actual harm suffered.
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of damages that are often the largest component of harm, severely restricting available remedies.
This is a direct acknowledgment by Midjourney that absolute data security is not assured, which has implications for users' expectations regarding the safety of their personal information.
Miro explicitly disclaims a guarantee of complete security for Personal Data, placing some responsibility on users to exercise their own caution.
Miro disclaims liability for unauthorized access or interception of user information up to the limit permitted by law, shifting the risk of data interception away from Miro.
This waiver eliminates the most significant categories of damages a Customer might suffer from a service failure, data breach, or security lapse, substantially narrowing available remedies.
The cap sets a hard ceiling on recoverable damages for either party, which directly limits the maximum financial remedy a Customer can obtain from Miro regardless of the severity of a breach.
By disclaiming all warranties beyond Section 10.1, Miro eliminates implied quality or fitness guarantees that would otherwise protect Customers under applicable law.
The exclusion removes entire categories of damages from the user's potential recovery, which are often the most significant damages in technology disputes.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Mistral AI regardless of the nature or severity of the claim.
The exclusion eliminates the categories of damages that most commonly represent large-scale business losses, significantly limiting recoverable harm even when actual losses are substantial.
The Customer cannot rely on any implied quality or suitability guarantees; if the products fail to meet the Customer's needs, Mistral AI bears no warranty liability.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to the Customer regardless of the magnitude of actual harm suffered, tying the ceiling directly to fees paid.
The exclusion is broad in both the type of harm covered and the causal connection required, meaning Customer bears full financial risk for any data-related problem arising from the Switch process.
The disclaimer eliminates the customer's ability to rely on implied legal protections about the quality, suitability, or ownership of the Application Services.
The exclusion prevents a customer from recovering the categories of harm most commonly associated with service failures—lost profits, lost revenue, and consequential losses—regardless of whether Mixp…
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to either party regardless of the magnitude of actual harm suffered, because total liability cannot exceed twelve months of fees or $1,000, whi…
Modal explicitly disclaims any guarantee of absolute security, limiting its liability for data breaches or losses.
The exclusion eliminates the categories of damages that are often the largest in commercial disputes, meaning that even a significant breach may yield no recoverable damages beyond direct losses.
The cap limits the maximum financial exposure of both parties regardless of the actual magnitude of harm suffered, which may be far greater than twelve months of fees.
The disclaimer eliminates implied legal protections that would otherwise attach by operation of law, leaving Customer without recourse for warranty-based claims against Modal.
A complete disclaimer of all warranties means the customer has no contractual warranty remedy against NVIDIA NIM for defects, title issues, or fitness of the Software Offerings.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most likely to represent a customer's actual loss—lost profits, lost data, and goodwill—limiting any claim to direct damages only, to the maximum e…
This cap defines the maximum financial exposure both parties face for Enterprise Product claims, limiting recovery to a backward-looking twelve-month fee amount regardless of actual harm.
The complete disclaimer of warranties means the user has no contractual assurance of quality, fitness, or reliability for the service, content, or software.
This exclusion removes liability for entire categories of harm—including consequential and indirect losses—that may substantially exceed direct damages in value.
The exclusion covers a broad set of Netflix-affiliated parties and categories of harm, significantly narrowing the damages users may be able to recover.
By disclaiming all warranties including implied ones, Nintendo eliminates any baseline guarantee of quality, fitness, or non-infringement that users might otherwise rely upon.
This establishes that Nintendo's data security obligations do not extend to information in the hands of third parties, leaving users without recourse against Nintendo for third-party breaches.
This establishes that Nintendo makes no warranty of absolute data security, which limits users' expectations about the protection of their information.
Users bear the full risk associated with User Content they post, as Nintendo accepts no responsibility or liability for it or for any loss or damage it may suffer.
The categories of excluded damages are broad, covering most harm that typically flows from service disruptions or failures rather than direct out-of-pocket losses.
This disclosure signals that outputs are not guaranteed to be accurate or appropriate, placing responsibility on users to exercise judgment before relying on or publishing content.
This instruction limits users' ability to treat Service outputs as professional guidance and signals that reliance on such outputs for professional decisions is outside the intended scope of the Serv…
The 'as is' and 'as available' basis means users receive the service in whatever state it exists at any given time, without any assurance of quality, completeness, or continuous availability.
The exclusion of all categories of damages, including direct damages, means users have no financial recourse against Okta for harm arising from site use, regardless of its severity.
By disclaiming all implied warranties, Okta removes baseline legal protections that would otherwise apply by default, leaving users without warranty recourse if the service fails to meet expected sta…
The total disclaimer of all warranties means users have no contractual assurance about the Service's quality, fitness, or performance.
This cap limits the maximum amount a user can recover from OneLogin regardless of the actual magnitude of harm suffered.
This exclusion removes the categories of damages most likely to be significant in a real-world loss scenario, limiting recoverable harm to direct damages only.
By capping total liability at the greater of fees paid or $5,000, OnlyFans limits the financial exposure it faces regardless of the nature or number of claims brought against it.
This exclusion removes a broad category of damages that would typically be available in a legal claim, significantly limiting the financial recourse available to business users who suffer harm.
The cap ties the maximum recoverable amount to historical spend, meaning low-spend customers have very limited recourse regardless of the severity of harm.
The exclusion of consequential and exemplary damages significantly limits the categories of loss for which users can seek compensation from OpenAI, even if actual harm occurs.
This disclaimer establishes the operational parameters under which the Services function, clarifying that accuracy assurance is not provided as a contractual obligation. It defines the division of re…
OpenAI disclaims liability for security or privacy breaches that result from circumvention, limiting users' ability to hold OpenAI responsible for such events.
Customers using Beta Services receive no indemnification coverage from OpenAI and accept the service without quality or liability protections.
The terms cap OpenAI's aggregate liability at the amount paid in the prior 12 months or $100, which means that even paid subscribers have very limited financial recourse against OpenAI for service fa…
This exclusion means that large categories of harm—including lost profits and consequential losses—are unrecoverable from either party regardless of the severity or cause of the harm.
OpenAI explicitly acknowledges a factual accuracy limitation in ChatGPT's output, which is relevant to user reliance on generated content.
OpenRouter expressly disclaims responsibility for what LLMs do with submitted data, including training use, meaning users have no recourse against OpenRouter for those downstream data uses.
OpenRouter expressly acknowledges a limit on its ability to protect user data after transmission, meaning no contractual or operational constraint on the Model Provider's training use is available fr…
The cap limits the maximum monetary recovery a user can obtain from OpenRouter regardless of the severity or number of claims, often to a very low dollar amount.
Users in regulated or high-stakes fields receive no warranty protection, meaning reliance on Output in those contexts is entirely at the user's risk.
Users cannot recover for broad categories of economic harm — including lost profits and lost data — even if those losses result directly from OpenSea's actions or failures.
Regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, users cannot recover more than $5,000 or their directly paid transaction amount from OpenSea and its affiliates, significantly limiting potential compens…
Users have no warranty protection for the Platform's performance, quality, or legal title, removing a standard layer of consumer protection.
By characterizing content as informational only and placing risk entirely on the user, Oscar Health limits its exposure to liability for any harm resulting from reliance on that content.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Oscar Health for direct damages, regardless of the actual harm suffered.
By disclaiming all warranties, Oscar Health and its licensors and suppliers eliminate any implied guarantees about the quality, fitness, or reliability of the Services and content.
A blanket disclaimer of all warranties means users have no contractual guarantee that the Services will function, be fit for purpose, or be available at any given time.
This $100 cap applies only in jurisdictions or circumstances where liability cannot be fully excluded, providing users with a minimal ceiling on any recoverable amount regardless of the harm suffered.
A blanket exclusion of all damage categories, including direct damages, is exceptionally broad and leaves users with no monetary remedy for virtually any harm arising from the Services.
By contractually establishing that the Services are neither a medical device nor a source of medical advice, Oura limits its liability for users who rely on health-related data or outputs from the Se…
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Paramount+ and its Affiliates regardless of the nature or scale of the harm, and is tied to the user's own prior payments.
The blanket disclaimer of all warranties means users have no contractual warranty protection from Paramount+ or its Affiliates regarding the quality, fitness, or availability of the Service, Content,…
This exclusion bars users from recovering categories of damages that often represent the most significant financial harm, such as lost profits or losses flowing from a service failure.
This exclusion significantly limits the types of damages a user can recover from PayPal, removing the most financially significant categories of harm.
Peacock's acknowledgment that no security method is infallible signals that data breaches or security failures remain possible despite its stated safeguards, limiting implied security guarantees.
The cap places a hard ceiling on any financial recovery a user can obtain from Peacock, regardless of the nature or scale of harm.
An 'AS IS' and 'AS AVAILABLE' disclaimer signals that Peloton is not warranting the quality, fitness, or continuous availability of the service, which limits Peloton's exposure for service failures o…
This exclusion eliminates categories of harm that are often the most significant in practice—such as lost profits or data loss—leaving users able to claim only direct damages, if any.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Peloton regardless of the number or severity of claims, tying recovery to past payments rather than actual harm.
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of damages that users might otherwise recover, regardless of how the harm arose or what legal theory is applied.
For most users, especially those on free tiers or low-cost plans, the effective cap on recoverable damages is $100, regardless of the actual harm suffered.
The clause explicitly disavows the Services and Output as sources of professional advice across multiple high-stakes domains, which bears on user reliance and potential liability claims.
Customers cannot recover indirect or consequential losses — such as lost profits or business — from Perplexity AI under this agreement, and Perplexity AI has the same protection against such claims f…
Customers cannot rely on any warranty — whether arising by contract, implication, or law — as a basis for a claim against Perplexity AI regarding the Services.
Regardless of the severity of a breach or failure, the maximum financial recovery from Perplexity AI is limited to fees already paid in the prior 12 months.
Excluding all indirect and consequential damages means users cannot recover for losses that flow from a breach or wrongful act but are not direct out-of-pocket losses, which are often the most signif…
Regardless of the magnitude of harm, Customer's maximum financial recovery from Perplexity AI is limited to the fees paid in the preceding 12 months.
The cap places an absolute ceiling on recoverable damages regardless of the nature or magnitude of harm, which may be far below the actual loss suffered.
The mutual exclusion of indirect damages means that even significant downstream financial losses caused by a breach or service failure cannot be recovered by either party.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Pika regardless of the severity or nature of the harm suffered.
The exclusion removes liability for the most common categories of significant harm users might suffer, limiting recoverable damages to direct losses only.
An express disclaimer of all liability covering accessed, submitted, and generated content is broad and may limit a user's ability to hold Pika responsible for harms arising from any such content.
The $50.00 ceiling applies to any damages arising from or related to the Terms, meaning a user's recoverable losses are effectively capped at a nominal amount regardless of the actual harm suffered.
Consolidating Affiliate claims under the Customer's cap prevents Affiliates from independently seeking damages beyond the agreed aggregate ceiling, effectively limiting total recoverable amounts.
This mechanism directly reduces the compensation Pinecone may owe a Customer whenever the Customer's own non-compliance generates regulatory costs for Pinecone, potentially eliminating recoverable am…
The release is permanent, covers every kind of claim, and extends to past and future disputes, broadly eliminating a user's ability to assert claims against Pinecone.
Pinecone acknowledges it cannot guarantee security, which limits any expectation that safeguards will prevent a breach and is relevant to liability in the event of a security incident.
This ensures that data-protection-specific claims—including those under the SCCs—cannot circumvent the Agreement's liability caps, limiting total exposure for both parties.
This exclusion eliminates recovery for the categories of harm most commonly resulting from service failures, including data loss and business disruption, for both users and third parties.
By disclaiming all guarantees regarding outcomes and performance and acknowledging all faults, Pinecone sets a baseline of no warranty, limiting user expectations and potential claims based on servic…
A $100 ceiling on all claims means users are effectively barred from recovering meaningful compensation from Pinterest regardless of the harm suffered.
This exclusion eliminates the categories of harm most likely to be significant to users—lost data, lost income, loss of goodwill—leaving only direct damages potentially recoverable, subject to the $1…
This exclusion eliminates a broad category of damages that are often the largest in disputes, significantly limiting the Client's ability to recover losses that flow from Plaid's actions.
The exclusion covers a wide range of damage categories, meaning customers are limited to direct damages when seeking compensation from PlanetScale.
The release is irrevocable and covers all liability related to AI Output, foreclosing copyright and other claims against PlanetScale after acceptance.
The cap ties maximum recoverable damages to a fixed historical payment window, which may be substantially lower than actual losses suffered.
The absence of any availability guarantee means users have no contractual assurance that specific bots, features, or the service itself will remain accessible.
The AS IS provision means users receive no warranties about the condition, quality, or fitness of the service, and access itself is explicitly unguaranteed.
Users who suffered significant harm could recover no more than their prior twelve months of payments to Quora, regardless of the actual magnitude of losses.
This exclusion removes Progressive's financial responsibility for a broad range of harms a user might suffer in connection with the site or its content.
A disclaimer of all warranties removes the standard legal assurances that the site functions properly, is suitable for any purpose, or does not infringe third-party rights.
This non-assumption of liability means the reader bears the risk of both unauthorized disclosure through their phone and physical or data damage to their devices.
This exclusion limits Progressive's responsibility for data breaches or unauthorized alterations, retaining liability only where Progressive's own gross negligence or intentional conduct is the cause.
Users seeking to exercise their privacy rights may face a fee or an outright denial, subject only to what applicable law allows, which may limit practical access to those rights.
This acknowledgment limits the basis on which users can claim they relied on Public.com's content as professional guidance.
Users cannot recover the categories of damages most commonly associated with financial or reputational harm, regardless of the cause.
This cap constrains the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Public.com regardless of the nature or scale of harm suffered.
Users cannot hold Public.com to any warranty regarding the quality, accuracy, reliability, or fitness of its Services or content.
Because the cap applies to all claims in the aggregate, the maximum recovery Company can obtain from Ramp—regardless of the number or severity of claims—is limited to a relatively modest financial ce…
Because the exclusion covers a broad range of damage categories including lost profits and reputational harm, the types of losses Company could realistically suffer from a service failure are largely…
This statement limits expectations of absolute data security, which may affect users' understanding of the risks of transmitting or storing personal data with RapidAPI.
Because this exclusion covers a wide range of damage types and extends to third parties, it substantially limits the categories of harm for which RapidAPI can be held financially responsible.
Because the cap is set at $100.00 regardless of the value of harm suffered, it sharply limits any financial recovery a user could obtain from RapidAPI.
This exclusion significantly limits the categories of damages users can recover, barring claims for losses that go beyond direct, out-of-pocket harm.
This limitation reduces or eliminates Redfin's legal accountability if your information is unintentionally disclosed, to the extent the law allows such a disclaimer.
Users have no warranty protections they can enforce against Redfin if the Services are defective, unavailable, or do not meet expectations.
Excluding these categories removes liability for the most common types of significant harm, such as lost profits or data loss, that customers are likely to experience.
Because the cap is the lower of two figures, customers who have paid little or nothing face a maximum recovery of US$100 regardless of the actual harm suffered.
This clause removes the categories of damages most likely to be significant in practice, meaning customers cannot recover for business losses or ripple-effect harms even if caused by Replicate.
This is an explicit disclaimer of any security guarantee, limiting Replicate's accountability for breaches or misuse of personal information.
This cap can render Replicate's maximum liability as low as US$100 regardless of the severity of the harm, because the cap is the lower of two already-limited figures.
The exclusion covers even direct damages, which is an unusually broad disclaimer; it eliminates most avenues for financial recovery against Replit, subject only to what applicable law mandates.
The disclaimer covers both express and implied warranties, meaning Replit makes no enforceable promise about the Service's quality, fitness, or availability, subject only to what law prohibits discla…
Replit explicitly disclaims any security or privacy guarantee, which limits users' ability to rely on contractual assurances if their data is compromised.
Revolut excludes all other forms of liability — including financial loss or consequential harm — arising from card unavailability, regardless of the cause.
The £100 excess and £85,000 ceiling define the outer financial limits of a consumer's recovery for any single APP scam claim.
This provision removes Revolut's refund obligation when the customer's own fraud, intentional failure, or carelessness contributed to the loss, placing the financial risk on the customer in those cir…
Ring disclaims all warranties, meaning users receive no assurance about the quality, reliability, or fitness of the Offerings.
The liability cap limits Ring's financial exposure to at most twelve months of fees paid—potentially zero for free Offerings—regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered.
Users who rely on Ring for security or emergency response should understand that Ring will not monitor their alerts or contact emergency services on their behalf unless they have a Professional Monit…
The absence of a security guarantee means users bear the residual risk of data exposure when transmitting personal information through Riot Services.
The absence of a provider-patient relationship with Ro may limit the legal duties and obligations Ro owes users under health care law.
For most users, this cap limits any recovery to $100 or their recent payments to Ro, potentially far below actual harm suffered.
This clause limits the types of financial harm users can seek compensation for in a dispute, excluding categories like lost investment profits or losses resulting from platform outages, which are dir…
Cryptocurrency assets held on Robinhood are not protected by SIPC or FDIC insurance, and the trading entity is a separate non-broker-dealer entity, which means users have different legal protections …
This provision clarifies the regulatory scope of investor protections available through the brokerage account structure. SIPC coverage limitations are material to account holders because they define …
The cash sweep mechanism operationalizes deposit insurance protection for account cash holdings by routing funds through FDIC-insured channels rather than holding uninvested cash at the broker. This …
This provision allocates risk disclosure obligations to the user and establishes Robinhood's unilateral authority to modify trading permissions based on its assessment of account suitability. The cla…
The provision operationalizes Robinhood's regulatory duty to disclose material information about its advisory and brokerage services, enabling customers to understand the firm's relationship model, c…
This provision authorizes Robinhood to liquidate all securities in a customer's account without prior notice or demand, which means customers using margin may lose positions at unfavorable prices wit…
This provision defines a core operational feature of margin accounts—the ability to leverage positions through borrowing—and establishes Robinhood's authorization to charge interest on borrowed capit…
The provision establishes the contractual framework for a high-risk trading product and ensures customers receive standardized risk disclosures before engaging in options trading. This serves to docu…
This cap means that regardless of the severity of harm, RunPod's maximum financial exposure to a user is either six months of that user's payments or $100.00, whichever is less—potentially far below …
By disclaiming all warranties, RunPod removes any guarantee of quality, reliability, or suitability, leaving users with no warranty-based recourse if the service fails to perform as expected.
Excluding all categories of damages—including direct damages—means users may have no avenue to recover any financial loss caused by RunPod, regardless of the type of harm suffered.
The explicit disclaimer that security cannot be guaranteed limits RunPod's liability exposure while acknowledging that personal information remains at risk despite safeguards.
Runway explicitly disclaims any guarantee of security, meaning users bear residual risk of data exposure despite the safeguards Runway employs.
This exclusion removes liability for many of the most significant categories of harm users may suffer, including loss of profits and data, regardless of whether Runway had prior warning.
This exclusion eliminates most categories of damages that would typically arise from service failures, data loss, or other harms, leaving users with a significantly narrowed set of recoverable losses.
Samsung's acknowledgment that security cannot be guaranteed, even with reasonable precautions, signals that users bear residual risk of data exposure.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Samsung for any and all claims tied to a specific service, regardless of the number or severity of claims.
Excluding these categories of damages eliminates the types of loss most likely to reflect the actual harm a user suffers, leaving only a narrow range of recoverable damages.
A $100 aggregate cap on all claims means users have severely limited financial recourse against Scale AI regardless of the harm suffered.
An 'as is' and 'as available' provision signals the absence of warranties about the Site's quality, fitness, or uninterrupted availability.
The exclusion eliminates the most economically significant categories of damages, meaning actual harm suffered—such as lost business or data—cannot be recovered even if caused by the other party's br…
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to either party regardless of the magnitude of actual harm suffered, tying recovery to historical fees paid.
This exclusion covers the full spectrum of damage categories, including direct damages, which means merchants may have no financial recourse against Shopify for virtually any harm suffered.
Users cannot hold Signal to any implied standard of quality, reliability, or suitability because Signal has disclaimed all such warranties.
Users cannot recover categories of damages beyond direct damages from the Signal Parties, no matter the nature of the harm suffered.
No matter how significant a harm a user suffers in connection with Signal's Terms or Services, the maximum financial recovery from Signal is $100.
Users cannot rely on Signal to reach emergency services in a crisis, which has direct safety implications.
The cumulative $1,000.00 ceiling means that no matter how many incidents or claims arise, the total recoverable amount from any SimpliSafe party never exceeds $1,000.00.
Users cannot rely on SimpliSafe as a substitute for insurance coverage, and the agreement explicitly places the burden of obtaining and paying for separate insurance entirely on the user.
Users have no warranty protection for some of the most life-critical functions a home security system may perform, leaving them without a contractual remedy if those features fail.
Agreement to the Terms itself operates as a release of all liability for Covered Claims, meaning users forfeit the ability to hold SimpliSafe liable for those claims upon acceptance.
This clause prevents users and third parties from recovering a broad range of damages — including consequential and punitive damages — regardless of the nature of the harm suffered in connection with…
The exclusion eliminates the largest categories of damages that typically arise from service failures, meaning the customer cannot recover for lost business value, operational disruption, or other do…
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to the customer regardless of the size of actual harm suffered, tying recovery to a backward-looking fee amount that may be far smaller than th…
The customer cannot rely on any implied warranty to support a claim against Smartsheet for service quality, legal compliance, or accuracy, removing a significant layer of default legal protection.
This cap applies to all claims in aggregate, meaning no matter how many or how serious the claims, the maximum financial exposure Snapchat faces is a nominal dollar amount for most users who pay noth…
This exclusion covers the categories of harm most likely to be substantial in practice, including lost profits and consequential losses, meaning recoverable damages are limited to direct harm only.
The complete disclaimer of warranties for AI Features and Outputs means Snapchat assumes no legal responsibility for the accuracy, safety, or fitness of any AI-generated content.
The liability cap for Data Protection Claims limits the maximum financial recovery available to either party, regardless of the severity of a data protection breach, to twice the prior year's fees pa…
The aggregate cap limits the total financial exposure of either party across all claims to a single year of fees paid to Snowflake, which may be substantially lower than actual damages suffered.
The exclusion of consequential and indirect damages means that even significant downstream losses—such as lost profits or business interruption caused by a service failure—cannot be recovered by eith…
This disclaimer means users bear the risk of loss or harm resulting from unauthorized account access, with no recourse against SoFi.
A broad exclusion of all damage categories, including direct damages, means users may be unable to recover any monetary compensation from SoFi for harms connected to SoFi Site use.
The cap ties the maximum recoverable amount to a specific balance at a specific moment in time, which may be zero or minimal, materially restricting any financial remedy available to a user.
The complete disclaimer of warranties across quality, functionality, availability, and performance means users have no contractual guarantee that the services or content will work, be available, or m…
The explicit disclaimer of absolute security means Sourcegraph Cody has not warranted that data will be fully protected, which is relevant if a breach occurs.
The cap places a ceiling on recoverable damages for confidentiality or data security breaches, which are among the most serious harms a software service can cause.
The exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most likely to represent a user's actual loss from service failures, including lost data and lost profits, regardless of whether such losses are dir…
The absence of any warranties means Spotify makes no legally enforceable commitments about the quality, fitness, reliability, or availability of the Service.
The cap places a hard ceiling on any financial recovery a user can obtain from Spotify, regardless of the nature or number of claims brought.
This exclusion covers virtually every recognized category of damages, including direct damages, meaning users may be unable to recover compensation for most harms caused by Square.
Square's security commitment is limited to reasonable measures; the explicit acknowledgment that the internet is not 100% secure signals that Square does not accept liability for security failures be…
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to users regardless of the actual harm suffered, which may be far less than actual losses.
With no warranties of any kind, users have no contractual assurance regarding the quality, fitness, or reliability of Square's Services.
Users have no warranty protection from Squarespace regarding the quality, suitability, or legality of the Services, which limits the basis for any warranty-based claims.
This cap severely limits the financial recovery a user can obtain from Squarespace regardless of the nature or number of claims, often reducing maximum recovery to $20 for users who have paid nothing…
The disclaimer of all warranties means users have no contractual assurance about the Site's quality, fitness, or reliability, removing a standard layer of consumer protection.
This exclusion covers the categories of damages most commonly awarded for significant harm, substantially limiting the monetary recovery available to users.
The disclaimer, to the extent it is enforceable under applicable law, eliminates warranty protections users might otherwise have regarding service quality, fitness for purpose, or reliability.
By allocating transmission risk to the user, Stability AI limits its own liability for data intercepted or compromised during transmission.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Stability AI regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, potentially far below actual damages.
This is an explicit disclaimer of any security guarantee, meaning Stability AI makes no enforceable commitment that unauthorized access will not occur.
One year is shorter than many statutory limitation periods, and the 'forever barred' consequence means users who miss the deadline lose all recourse regardless of the merits.
A $100 cap on total liability means users can recover no more than $100 regardless of the nature or magnitude of harm suffered.
This sweeping exclusion of liability means users have no recourse against Starbucks or its personnel for harms arising from use of the Sites or their content.
This disclaimer establishes a ceiling on Starbucks's security assurance, putting users on notice that a data breach or unauthorized access remains a possibility regardless of security measures in pla…
A full disclaimer of warranties means Starbucks makes no guarantees about the Sites' quality, fitness, or reliability, leaving users without warranty-based remedies to the fullest extent the law perm…
The cap ties Stash's maximum exposure directly to prior user payments, which could be very low or even zero for users who paid little or nothing, severely limiting any potential recovery.
This clause attempts to eliminate liability across every major legal category of damages for a broad group of entities, leaving users with no damages remedy against Stash or its named affiliates.
This exclusion covers every recognized category of damages, including direct damages, which courts often treat as a baseline entitlement, leaving users with no damages remedy against Stash arising fr…
An 'as is' disclaimer with express disavowal of all warranties eliminates any assurance of quality, fitness, accuracy, or reliability that a user might otherwise expect.
The cap ties maximum recovery to historical fees paid, which may be a small amount relative to actual losses, and it applies across all damages and causes of action combined.
By disclaiming all warranties, Stash removes any baseline legal assurance of quality, fitness, or reliability that would otherwise attach to its Services, Offerings, Content, and Platform Materials.
The disclaimer of all warranties means users receive no guarantee about the quality, fitness, reliability, or availability of Steam, its content, or its services, to the fullest extent the law allows.
This exclusion means that even when Valve is at fault or has breached a warranty, users cannot recover the categories of damages most commonly associated with significant loss, such as lost profits o…
This exclusion eliminates categories of damages that are often the largest component of harm a user might suffer, effectively limiting recovery to direct damages only.
The absence of warranties means users have no contractual guarantee about the quality, fitness, accuracy, or reliability of the Services, limiting their basis for claims if the Services fail to perfo…
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from StockX regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, which may be far less than actual damages.
By disclaiming all warranties, Strava makes no legal commitments about the quality, reliability, or fitness of its Services or Content, removing a standard category of user protections.
The cap means that no matter how significant the harm a user suffers, the maximum financial recovery from Strava under these Terms is either $50 or the user's last 12 months of payments—whichever is …
The clause allocates full responsibility for customer-facing commerce to the User and removes Stripe from any liability for that commerce, leaving Users with no recourse against Stripe for product or…
This cap limits how much a user can recover from Stripe regardless of actual harm suffered, which may be far less than damages incurred.
The clause places full legal compliance responsibility on the User for their customer-facing commerce activities, with no shared or fallback liability on Stripe.
This exclusion eliminates most categories of significant damages a user might seek to recover, limiting recovery to direct losses only.
The clause fully insulates Stripe from legal responsibility for harm caused by a Platform's conduct, leaving the User with no recourse against Stripe for Platform-related failures.
By disclaiming all warranties and statutory guarantees, Stripe removes assurances about the quality, fitness, or reliability of its Services that users might otherwise rely on.
The clause formally separates Stripe's role from that of a Platform, limiting the scope of services Stripe is responsible for to only those expressly described in the named agreements.
The disclosure establishes that Substack does not warrant the security of user information and explicitly acknowledges the possibility of compromise at any time, which limits expectations of data pro…
The cap means that regardless of the scale of harm a user suffers, the maximum financial recovery from Substack is bounded by a floor of $100 or recent fees paid, which for many free-tier users effec…
A sender's deletion request or account deletion does not obligate recipients to remove direct messages, meaning the sender has no enforceable right to compel removal of messages from recipients' poss…
By excluding consequential and indirect damages, the clause eliminates the categories of loss that are typically the largest in practice—such as lost profits, lost data, or downstream harm—leaving us…
This exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most commonly suffered by users in technology disputes, such as lost data or lost business opportunity, leaving users with a narrowed range of reco…
The cap restricts the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Suno regardless of the severity or number of claims, potentially far below actual harm suffered.
Suno's explicit disclaimer of perfect security means users bear residual risk of data interception or breach during transmission.
The disclaimer removes any warranty-based recourse a reader might otherwise have if the services fail to meet expected standards.
The cap directly limits the maximum financial recovery available to either party regardless of the actual harm suffered.
These exclusions eliminate the categories of damages most likely to represent a reader's actual economic loss from a service failure or breach.
The exclusion eliminates the largest categories of damages that typically arise from service failures, severely limiting recoverable losses for both parties.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery available to either party regardless of how severe the harm, tying recovery directly to recent spend.
This mutual limitation bars recovery of consequential, punitive, or other non-direct damages in any dispute between the customer and T-Mobile under any legal theory.
The clause eliminates a broad range of damage categories—including lost profits and lost data—for both users and third parties, substantially limiting any monetary recovery against Tabnine.
The clause transfers all responsibility for the consequences of using or incorporating Suggested Code away from Tabnine and onto the user.
The clause removes Tabnine from accountability for the quality or correctness of Suggested Code, leaving users without recourse against Tabnine for errors or unreliable suggestions.
The clause disclaims any guarantee of transmission security and places the risk of data interception or compromise during transmission entirely on the user.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a Client can obtain from TaskRabbit regardless of actual damages suffered.
This cap limits financial recovery regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, and it applies to third parties as well, even though only the user's payments set the ceiling.
This exclusion covers a broad range of damage categories, including direct damages, which means users may be unable to recover most foreseeable losses from Teachable even when harm results from platf…
Users are required to pre-acknowledge a specific risk — reduced privacy protections — before that risk materializes, which limits their ability to later dispute the adequacy of protections afforded t…
A total disclaimer of all warranties—both express and implied—removes any assurance about the site's accuracy, reliability, or fitness, leaving readers without warranty-based recourse.
Providing the site on an 'as is' and 'as available' basis is the foundation for disclaiming warranties and limiting liability for the site's condition or accessibility.
Explicitly excluding legal-advice status and attorney-client relationship formation removes legal and professional duties that would otherwise attach, limiting Thomson Reuters' obligations to users w…
Meta explicitly disclaims control over user information after it is transmitted to Third Party Services, shifting governance of that data entirely to external parties whose terms the user may not hav…
Users who delete their accounts permanently lose access to digital assets tied to that account, including NFTs, which may have monetary or experiential value.
The absence of warranties means users have no contractual assurance of Platform safety, security, or reliability, including for AI-enabled features.
The cap means that regardless of the severity of harm a user suffers, TikTok's financial exposure is limited to a very small dollar amount, which effectively constrains any monetary recovery.
Excluding these damage categories means users cannot recover the types of damages that are often the most significant in harm cases, substantially limiting the practical value of any legal claim.
By placing all consequences on the user to the maximum extent permitted by law, TikTok limits its own responsibility for any harms arising from reliance on or use of AI-generated output.
The cap directly limits the maximum financial recovery available to a claimant regardless of actual damages suffered, and the three-month lookback window means advertisers who spent little recently f…
The exclusion covers the categories of loss most commonly associated with advertising failures—lost profits, lost revenue, lost data, and reputational harm—leaving the account holder without recourse…
The total disclaimer of warranties means TikTok Ads bears no contractual obligation regarding the quality, fitness, reliability, or availability of its Commercial Products and Display Sites.
The cap restricts the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Tinder regardless of the nature or number of claims, which could be far less than any actual harm suffered.
The exclusion eliminates the categories of damages most likely to reflect the actual harm a user suffers, limiting recovery to direct damages only.
The exclusion eliminates entire categories of damages that often constitute the largest portion of a party's actual loss, significantly limiting potential recovery.
The cap limits the maximum financial exposure Together AI faces regardless of the magnitude of harm the customer suffers.
Users facing an audit may assume TurboTax will advocate on their behalf; this clause explicitly forecloses that, leaving the user without professional representation through TurboTax.
Users who assume the bookkeeping service will catch financial irregularities or fraud may be left exposed; TurboTax explicitly disclaims that function.
This exclusion removes the categories of damages most likely to be large in a dispute, significantly limiting what either party can recover even where liability is established.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery either party can obtain, regardless of the actual scale of harm suffered.
The disclaimer eliminates implied warranties that users might otherwise assume exist, limiting Twitch's responsibility for the quality, fitness, or reliability of its Services and content.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Twitch regardless of the nature or magnitude of harm, and users who pay nothing would be limited to $100.
This clause disclaims Twitch's ability to guarantee transmission security and expressly places the risk of interception, disclosure, alteration, or destruction on the user.
By disclaiming every recognized form of agency and employment, Uber positions itself as not legally responsible for the acts or omissions of Third-Party Providers.
The exclusion covers a broad range of serious harms — including personal injury and death — and is triggered by any use of the Services, limiting users' ability to recover damages from Uber.
This cap means that even if a user suffers losses far exceeding $100.00 USD through use of Uniswap's products, the maximum recoverable amount from Uniswap is $100.00 USD or its local currency equival…
Excluding these categories of damages means users cannot recover losses that go beyond direct damages, which are typically the most significant losses in disputes involving financial products.
Requiring express assumption of all risks limits Uniswap's exposure to claims arising from product use by placing responsibility for any resulting harm on the user.
By requiring acknowledgment and acceptance of this risk, UnitedHealthcare puts the user on notice that confidentiality of electronic communications is not guaranteed, which has implications for the s…
The clause purports to eliminate UnitedHealthcare's liability across an extremely broad range of losses, including those caused by UnitedHealthcare's own acts or omissions, which could leave users wi…
The absence of any representation regarding service quality or safety means users cannot rely on implied warranties of reliability or security for the Online Services.
Users cannot recover the most significant categories of economic harm—lost profits, business interruption, and consequential losses—even if caused directly or indirectly by Unity.
The cap sets a hard ceiling on monetary recovery from Unity regardless of the size or nature of the harm suffered, which may be far below actual damages.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from the Epic Parties regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm suffered.
By capping recovery at direct damages in any circumstance, the clause prevents users from recovering amounts beyond their direct out-of-pocket loss regardless of the nature or severity of PayPal's co…
This exclusion bars recovery for categories of harm—such as lost profits and consequential losses—that may far exceed direct damages, significantly limiting the total compensation a user can obtain.
Venmo expressly acknowledges the limits of its security commitments, meaning users cannot rely on a guarantee of data protection even where safeguards exist.
Users cannot recover indirect or consequential damages from Vercel regardless of the severity or foreseeability of the harm, which significantly limits available remedies.
Users who suffer significant direct harm may only recover up to the greater of $100 or six months of fees paid, regardless of the actual magnitude of damages.
The disclaimer covers all categories of damages—including direct damages—and extends to every party involved in creating or delivering the site, leaving users without a damages remedy against any of …
By placing the entire risk on the user, Visa disclaims responsibility for deficiencies in quality, performance, accuracy, and effort for all information and services on the site.
The total disclaimer of all warranties means users have no warranty-based recourse against Walgreens if the Services are defective, unavailable, or fail to meet any standard of quality or fitness.
If a user suffers harm related to the Services but made no purchase, the cap could result in zero monetary recovery from Walgreens, and even with a purchase the recovery is limited to that transactio…
The exclusion of consequential and indirect damages means users cannot recover for losses beyond direct damages, even when Walmart had prior knowledge that such damages could occur.
The disclaimer eliminates standard warranty protections users might otherwise expect, subject only to what applicable law prohibits from being disclaimed.
Waze assigns all risk of participation in user activities—whether directly or indirectly connected to Waze use—to the user, which may limit Waze's liability exposure for harms arising from such activ…
The exclusion covers both direct and consequential damages, eliminating virtually all categories of recoverable loss arising from use of the Service.
A disclaimer of all warranties, both express and implied, means users have no contractual assurance of quality, accuracy, fitness, or reliability of the Service or Content.
By placing responsibility for conduct and consequences entirely on users at all times, Waze shifts risk away from itself and onto the user for any outcome arising from use of the Service.
A $100 ceiling on all cumulative liability means a user cannot recover more than that amount from Wealthfront regardless of the nature or extent of any harm.
A total disclaimer of all warranties means users have no warranty-based recourse against Wealthfront for the quality, accuracy, or fitness of its website, content, or user information.
Webull disclaims any advisory role, placing the full burden of investment suitability assessment on the reader.
The reader is exposed to full liability for all account activity, regardless of whether they personally authorized or performed the action.
This exclusion prevents the reader from recovering the categories of damages most likely to reflect actual business harm—such as lost profits or downstream losses—from Weights & Biases.
This cap limits the maximum financial recovery either party can obtain for most claims, regardless of actual damages suffered, which directly constrains the reader's ability to seek full compensation.
The complete disclaimer of warranties means users have no contractual guarantee about the quality, fitness, or ownership characteristics of the Services.
This exclusion eliminates entire categories of damages that users might otherwise seek to recover, significantly restricting the remedies available for harms connected to WhatsApp's Terms.
This release extinguishes users' ability to pursue WhatsApp and a broad range of associated individuals and entities for claims connected to third-party conduct.
This cap means that regardless of the severity of harm a user suffers in connection with WhatsApp's Terms or Services, the maximum monetary recovery from WhatsApp is extremely limited.
Users who attempt to use WhatsApp to contact emergency services in a crisis will not be connected, which could have life-safety consequences.
The exclusion covers a broad range of damage categories and applies across all legal theories, substantially limiting the types of loss the reader can recover from Whoop.
The clause eliminates Whoop's liability exposure for AI Technology use as broadly as law permits, potentially covering a wide range of harms connected to AI features.
This exclusion eliminates recovery for the most significant categories of economic harm that typically result from service failures, limiting any claim to direct damages only.
Users are required to accept that residual security risk rests with them, which may limit Windsurf's liability for security failures not covered by its commercially reasonable measures.
A total disclaimer of all warranties means the customer receives no assurance of fitness, merchantability, or any other quality guarantee for anything Windsurf provides.
A total disclaimer of liability for Output consequences means the customer bears all risk from acting on or using anything the Services generate, regardless of whether the Output is inaccurate.
The absence of automatic deposit insurance means customers' funds held with Wise do not carry the same default protections as funds held in a traditional insured bank account.
The absence of automatic deposit insurance means users bear the risk of loss on funds held with Wise without the protections that apply to traditional bank deposits.
The complete disclaimer of all warranties, both express and implied, means Workday makes no enforceable promises about the quality, accuracy, availability, or fitness of its Sites or content.
A $100 cap applies regardless of the form of action or the actual harm suffered, substantially limiting any monetary recovery against Workday.
This exclusion covers the categories of harm most likely to be significant in practice, such as lost profits or consequential losses, substantially limiting recoverable damages.
The exclusion covers many of the most common and significant harms users might experience, including lost business value and data loss, leaving the reader with very limited recoverable damages.
An 'as is' disclaimer with a full warranty waiver means Writer makes no guarantee about the services' quality, fitness, accuracy, or reliability, leaving the user without contractual recourse for ser…
Regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, the reader's maximum financial recovery from the Writer Parties for any service-related claim is limited to $100.
Excluding these categories of damages significantly limits the types of harm for which users can seek compensation, covering many of the most substantial losses that could arise from product or servi…
An 'as is' and 'as available' disclaimer eliminates warranty protections users might otherwise have, meaning Wyze makes no guarantees about the quality, fitness, or reliability of its products, servi…
A hard monetary cap on total liability limits the maximum compensation a user can recover from Wyze and the other Wyze Parties regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm.
Users have no guarantee of service quality, reliability, or fitness for any purpose, and absorb all risk arising from use.
This cap strictly limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain regardless of the extent of actual harm suffered.
The clause establishes that a federal statutory regime limits Xfinity's otherwise broad data use rights specifically with respect to CPNI in the telecommunications services context.
The exclusion covers virtually every recognized category of damages, including direct damages, which means users may be left without a meaningful financial remedy even where harm is clear.
The clause explicitly disclaims a guarantee of security effectiveness, establishing that Xfinity bears no contractual assurance of complete protection against unauthorized access.
The cap places a hard ceiling on any financial recovery a user can obtain from Xfinity regardless of the severity of the harm, and that ceiling may be low relative to actual damages.
This clause places a low ceiling on Yelp's financial exposure regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, which could be $100 or less for users who paid nothing.
This disclaimer eliminates Yelp's contractual responsibility for defects, inaccuracies, or unavailability of the Service, shifting risk to the user.
An as-is disclaimer means users cannot rely on YouTube Ads having made enforceable promises about the Service's quality, reliability, or content.
The liability cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from YouTube Ads regardless of the nature or severity of the claim.
The 'as is' and 'as available' disclaimer means users have no warranty protection regarding the condition, accuracy, reliability, or availability of the site or any of its content.
Disclaiming all warranties, including implied ones, removes standard legal protections users might otherwise have regarding the quality, suitability, and ownership characteristics of the service.
The release covers both known and unknown claims of every kind and nature, broadly eliminating users' ability to pursue Zelle for dispute-related harm including actual and consequential damages.
A $100.00 liability cap places a firm ceiling on any monetary recovery a user could obtain from the Zelle Network, regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered.
Excluding liability for all categories of damages — including direct damages — removes nearly all monetary recourse users might otherwise have against the Zelle Network.
By disclaiming all implied warranties, Zendesk removes default legal protections that customers might otherwise rely on if the services fail to meet expected standards.
Excluding consequential damages means neither party can recover for indirect or downstream financial harm, which is often where the largest losses occur in a service failure.
The cap limits the maximum financial exposure of both parties regardless of the severity or nature of the harm, which may leave the customer undercompensated for significant losses.
This cap means that regardless of the scale of harm a user suffers, Zillow's maximum financial exposure is either the user's prior payments or $100, severely limiting any monetary recovery.
By placing the entire risk of quality, performance, and accuracy on the user, Zillow disclaims responsibility for any deficiency in how the Services function or the results they produce.
By excluding these categories of damages, Zillow eliminates liability for the types of losses that are often the largest in technology-related disputes, such as lost profits or business harm.
Excluding indirect and consequential damages means that even significant downstream losses caused by service failures—such as lost profits or lost data—are not recoverable from ZipRecruiter.
A full warranty disclaimer means users have no contractual basis to claim the service meets any standard of quality or fitness.
Because the cap defaults to the lesser of the two figures, users who paid little or nothing can recover no more than $10 regardless of the harm suffered.
The exclusion removes the categories of damages that are typically the largest in technology-related disputes, significantly limiting what users can recover even if Zoom is found liable.
The cap limits the maximum financial recovery a user can obtain from Zoom regardless of the number or severity of claims, and users who pay little or nothing may effectively have no recovery.
The disclaimer eliminates all warranty protections for users, meaning Zoom makes no legally enforceable promise about the quality, fitness, or performance of its Services and Software.
Providing Services 'as is' and 'as available' at the user's own risk signals the absence of warranties about quality, fitness, or reliability.
The exclusion applies to any claim at law or in equity and extends to third parties, broadly limiting the categories of loss for which eBay can be held financially responsible.
Regardless of the magnitude of harm suffered, users cannot recover more than $100 or amounts already paid to xAI, significantly limiting practical legal recourse.
By disclaiming all warranties to the fullest legal extent, xAI makes no guarantees about the Service's quality, fitness, or reliability, leaving users with no contractual warranty recourse.
Passengers who are involuntarily denied boarding have federally mandated compensation rights that American is required to honor; the specific dollar amounts are set by DOT regulation and can be subst…
The Montreal Convention provides a minimum floor of liability protection for international passengers that American cannot contractually eliminate, but also sets a ceiling that may limit recovery in …
This provision limits passenger recovery to direct damages only, excluding business losses, missed connections with independent consequences, and other downstream financial impacts. The enforceabilit…
This provision limits American's contractual obligations during irregular operations caused by external factors, which are among the most common sources of passenger disruption. The practical scope o…
If your checked luggage contains items worth more than the liability cap and you did not declare a higher value, you may not recover the full cost of your loss from American regardless of fault.
This provision reflects a DOT-mandated passenger protection; it is one of the few areas where the CoC directly incorporates a specific, enforceable consumer right with a defined time limit.
Because scheduled times are not part of the contract, passengers generally cannot claim compensation solely based on a flight being late unless DOT tarmac delay rules or other specific regulatory pro…
This provision establishes the maximum recoverable amount for international baggage claims, denominated in SDRs, and limits passengers' ability to seek compensation beyond the treaty-specified ceilin…
Disability accommodation rights under the ACAA and DOT regulations are statutory and cannot be contractually limited by the CoC; passengers with disabilities have enforceable rights to accommodation …
This provision establishes procedural deadlines that, if missed, may bar passengers from pursuing compensation regardless of the merits of the underlying claim. The 24-hour domestic deadline is opera…
The liability cap at 12 months of fees and the exclusion of consequential damages, including lost profits and lost data, limits the financial recovery available to business customers if the Services …
If your login credentials are compromised and someone makes unauthorized transactions, your ability to recover those funds depends on how quickly you report the problem and whether you can demonstrat…
If an outage or error causes you financial harm beyond a direct transaction loss, such as a missed payment penalty or investment loss, you may not be able to recover those damages from the bank.
Linked third-party sites carry no implied approval or accountability from Experian, meaning users rely on such sites entirely at their own risk.
This acknowledgment signals that the warranty and liability limitations stated elsewhere in the agreement may be legally unenforceable depending on where the reader is located.
By characterising the output as an estimation of change rather than an absolute measurement, Garmin limits the precision users can expect from the skin temperature feature.
This establishes that Pulse Ox accuracy is subject to personal physical variables and environmental conditions that users may not be able to eliminate.
This establishes that skin temperature measurements are subject to external and positional variables, further limiting the reliability users can place on the data.
This establishes that Pulse Ox accuracy is conditional on physical factors the user may not fully control, limiting reliance on the data.
This clause means Hulu does not guarantee any specific content will remain accessible, limiting user reliance on the presence of particular titles.
This provision asserts the broadest liability exclusion permitted by applicable law, covering all damage categories including lost data and revenue, and disclaims responsibility for third-party conte…
This provision describes the safety testing and harm mitigation processes Microsoft states it applies to AI systems, which is relevant to consumers and regulated entities assessing the risk profile o…
This provision addresses whether human review exists over AI decisions, which is relevant to individuals who may be affected by automated decisions made by Microsoft AI systems in consequential conte…
The terms disclaim all warranties on AI-generated outputs and service availability, which places reliance risk entirely on users and is particularly significant for users who use AI outputs in profes…
This limitation means that even if Robinhood's actions or service failures cause significant financial harm beyond the direct loss, the agreement asserts that customers cannot recover those additiona…
The disclosure establishes the extent to which customer assets are protected against broker insolvency under federal SIPC requirements. This clarifies the regulatory framework governing account prote…
The disclaimer means Unity accepts no responsibility if a customer relies on Unity's provided information as a legal determination of their compliance obligations.
These governance structures define the internal oversight mechanisms Microsoft states it has in place for AI accountability, which is relevant to assessing whether adequate human oversight exists ove…
The SIPC disclosure informs customers of the scope and limits of account protection, which is material to understanding the actual financial safety net available in the event of broker-dealer insolve…
Monitor emails you the same day a platform you choose changes these clauses.
A liability limitation clause is a provision in a platform's terms of service or privacy policy governing liability limitation-related rights, obligations, or restrictions.
ConductAtlas tracks 287 platforms with liability limitation clauses - roughly 82% of platforms in the archive. 2172 are classified as high severity.
Severity reflects the magnitude of rights waived, availability of opt-out, breadth of users affected, financial or legal exposure created, and the degree of discretion retained by the platform.