Found in 252 of 343 platforms tracked (73% adoption) · 913 provisions
This disclaimer defines the operational scope and intended use of the service by explicitly excluding medical diagnosis and treatment guidance from the Services' purposes. It establishes the allocati…
The liability limitation establishes a defined maximum financial exposure for the company across all claim categories related to service use. This cap operates as a threshold mechanism that converts …
This provision limits the monetary recovery available to users who experience harm from genetic testing errors, data incidents, or service failures, which may result in recoverable amounts being mate…
The clause operates as a contractual limitation on exposure for the service provider, establishing predetermined maximum financial responsibility regardless of claim type or magnitude. This structure…
For developers or businesses that rely on AI21's API for production systems, a liability cap of $100 or twelve months of fees may be far below the actual cost of a service failure, data incident, or …
For businesses that rely on AWS for critical infrastructure, this cap may be far smaller than actual losses from a serious outage or data incident, leaving the customer to absorb the majority of the …
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on AWS's recoverable liability that may be significantly lower than actual losses experienced by customers in the event of a service failure, data loss,…
This provision, combined with the aggregate liability cap, means that data loss, service downtime-related revenue loss, customer churn attributable to AWS service failures, and reputational harm are …
The disclaimer of output accuracy warranties and the cap on liability means that organizations relying on Bedrock outputs for business-critical or regulated decisions bear the risk of inaccurate or i…
This provision places the full burden of regulatory compliance for AI-generated content, data protection, and sector-specific rules on the customer, meaning organizations deploying Bedrock in regulat…
This disclaimer allocation establishes the baseline warranty structure for the service by specifying that users cannot rely on implied commitments regarding the quality, suitability, or ownership sta…
This provision establishes that customers bear the legal compliance burden for AI-generated content and outputs, which is operationally significant for organizations deploying Bedrock in content gene…
The dual-layer liability structure operates to restrict the scope of recoverable damages and establish a monetary ceiling based on historical fees paid. This provision allocates financial risk by exc…
This provision establishes that the maximum financial recovery available to a user for any claim against Acorns is limited to 12 months of subscription fees paid, which at Acorns' current pricing tie…
This provision limits the maximum financial recovery available to customers for claims against ActiveCampaign to twelve months of subscription fees, regardless of the scale of operational or data-rel…
This allocation of chargeback liability creates a clear financial obligation structure whereby merchants assume all chargeback costs and Adyen establishes an automatic recovery mechanism through sett…
The liability limitation establishes a defined financial exposure threshold for Adyen and restricts the categories of recoverable damages. This provision operationalizes the agreement's risk allocati…
This provision establishes that Airbnb does not assume responsibility for Hosts' regulatory compliance, placing full compliance obligation on the Host operator. The operational significance is that H…
The provision establishes the framework governing Airbnb's legal exposure and the remedies available to users in dispute scenarios. By restricting recoverable damages to direct damages only and exclu…
This clause places the compliance burden for export control and sanctions screening on the customer, meaning organizations using AWS to process, store, or transmit data or technology must independent…
This provision allocates responsibility for third-party seller conduct and product quality to the individual sellers rather than to Amazon as the platform operator. It establishes the contractual bas…
This clause establishes a financial ceiling on Amazon's liability exposure per user claim and excludes entire categories of damages. The cap may be practically low for users who sustained losses exce…
This provision establishes AWS's security requirements as a contractual obligation, creating a baseline standard that protects AWS infrastructure and other customers' systems from exploitation or dis…
The liability cap establishes the maximum financial exposure Amazon accepts for breach, negligence, or other claims, which affects the economic calculation for dispute resolution and determines the r…
The provision establishes the baseline liability framework governing the relationship by eliminating Amazon's obligation to warrant service quality or fitness for purpose and restricting recoverable …
This clause caps the financial recovery available to consumers regardless of the actual harm suffered, including in cases involving incidental or consequential losses, and extends the exclusion to Am…
The liability caps define the maximum financial exposure American Airlines assumes for loss, damage, or delay of checked baggage on international routes. The applicable cap depends on which internati…
The liability cap establishes the maximum financial exposure American Airlines accepts for baggage-related losses on domestic flights, while the categorical exclusions for certain item types create d…
The liability limitation establishes a defined financial ceiling for dispute resolution, regardless of claim type or the party's prior knowledge of potential damages. This provision operates as a gov…
This limitation establishes the maximum financial exposure Anthropic accepts for service-related claims, defining the scope of potential damages recovery regardless of claim type or alleged harm. The…
This cap means that even significant harm caused by AI errors or service failures may result in very limited financial recovery, particularly for free-tier users who are capped at $100.
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure Anyscale accepts under the agreement, restricting the types of damages recoverable and establishing a numerical ceiling on liability claims regardles…
This clause establishes a standardized purchasing pathway requirement across the App Store ecosystem, directing all transactions through Apple's in-app purchase system. The prohibition on external pu…
This provision establishes the operational boundary between Apple's data governance and third-party developers' data governance. It clarifies that Apple's privacy obligations do not extend to third-p…
The licensing structure—rather than ownership—means Apple retains rights to modify, revoke, or restrict access to purchased digital products. This provision establishes the legal basis for Apple's au…
The clause establishes that Apple makes no guarantees about service functionality, content quality, or fitness for particular purposes, and narrows the categories of damages recoverable in disputes. …
The liability cap operates as a contractual limitation on exposure for both parties and establishes a predictable ceiling for potential damages in breach or performance disputes. This mechanism affec…
This clause operationalizes a financial limitation on Auth0's exposure by anchoring liability to customer payments rather than actual damages claimed, which affects the risk allocation framework betw…
If Auth0 experiences an outage or security incident that affects a business's users, the limitation of liability clause determines the maximum financial recovery available, which may be significantly…
This limitation of liability clause establishes the maximum financial exposure Binance.US accepts in user disputes, which determines the scope of available remedies and the cost structure for resolvi…
The clause operates to restrict the financial exposure of Binance.US in disputes by categorically excluding entire classes of damages and establishing a monetary ceiling on total liability. This stru…
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-allocation mechanism that assigns to users the financial and legal burden of defending Binance.US against third-party claims connected to the user's cond…
The agreement caps total recoverable damages at a low threshold, meaning users who experience significant financial losses due to platform errors, outages, or misconduct may be contractually limited …
The liability cap defines the outer boundary of Bluesky's financial exposure across all claim types and dispute scenarios. This provision operates as a threshold mechanism that restricts the amount o…
A $100 cap on total liability is extremely low for a consumer-facing social platform, and means users have virtually no financial remedy even for significant harms caused by the platform's operations.
This provision defines the contractual structure of transactions on the platform by establishing that Trip Providers, not Booking.com, are the primary contracting parties for reservations. This alloc…
This provision allocates contractual responsibility and liability risk by establishing that Booking.com does not assume obligations for service provider delivery, quality, or conduct. The clause defi…
The clause allocates financial risk by limiting the categories of damages recoverable against Booking.com in disputes. This establishes the scope of potential liability exposure the platform accepts …
The liability cap creates a defined ceiling for damages Box may owe across all liability scenarios, which establishes predictability regarding Box's maximum financial exposure under the agreement. Th…
If Box experiences a data breach, extended outage, or service failure that causes significant business harm, users can only recover a limited amount equal to recent subscription fees, which may be fa…
The liability cap operates to define the maximum financial exposure Calm assumes for service-related claims. This mechanism restricts recoverable damages across all liability categories unless jurisd…
The liability cap establishes the maximum financial exposure Calm accepts under the agreement and defines the framework within which damage claims are resolved. The clause designates this cap as a fu…
For free-tier users, the practical liability ceiling is AUD $100 regardless of the nature or extent of loss, which may significantly limit financial recourse in the event of data loss, service failur…
The liability limitation establishes the outer boundary of financial exposure for Canva across all dispute scenarios, which affects the economic framework governing potential remedies available to us…
This clause functions as a notice provision establishing that specific liability caps and dispute resolution procedures are operative within the agreement and placing responsibility on users to revie…
The provision establishes a procedural requirement that users review liability and dispute resolution terms before using Cash App. By directing attention to specific sections, the terms structure use…
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure Cash App accepts for service failures, transaction errors, or operational breaches. This constraint shapes the economic risk allocation betwee…
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-allocation mechanism whereby users assume legal defense obligations and liability exposure for specified categories of claims involving their actions, co…
This disclaimer allocates responsibility for third-party data or information contained within user inputs to the user rather than to Cerebras. The clause defines the boundary of Cerebras's operationa…
This liability cap operates to define the scope of financial exposure Cerebras accepts for service failures or breaches. By excluding entire categories of damages from potential recovery, the provisi…
This cap means that even if Character.AI's platform causes significant real-world harm, such as through a data breach, harmful AI outputs, or unauthorized content use, the company's financial exposur…
The clause significantly narrows the scope of recoverable damages by categorically excluding entire classes of harm (consequential, indirect, and intangible losses) and establishing a fixed monetary …
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure Character.AI assumes under the agreement, establishing a ceiling on recoverable damages regardless of the nature or magnitude of claimed losses. This…
This provision allocates responsibility for content evaluation and risk assessment to users rather than the service provider. It establishes a liability exclusion for AI-generated outputs and third-p…
This liability limitation operates to define the outer boundary of financial exposure for Checkout.com across all potential claims. The cap is measured against recent transaction fees, which creates …
This clause allocates chargeback risk entirely to the merchant and establishes a direct collection mechanism through settlement fund deductions, which affects cash flow management and reserve account…
For businesses that store critical project data on ClickUp and pay substantial subscription fees, the liability cap may be far lower than the actual cost of a serious service failure or data loss eve…
This clause establishes the financial scope of ClickUp's exposure in dispute resolution by capping recoverable damages to a defined monetary threshold. This cap operates as a material allocation of r…
This disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that the provider makes no affirmative guarantees regarding service performance, reliability, or security characteristics. This provision defines the ba…
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism that allocates legal and financial responsibility for disputes related to subscriber conduct or content to the subscriber, rather than…
For businesses relying on Cloudflare for mission-critical infrastructure, this cap may be far lower than actual damages suffered during a significant outage or security incident, leaving a substantia…
Limitation of liability provisions determine the maximum financial recourse users have if the service fails, outputs are inaccurate, or service disruption causes loss, which is particularly material …
The provision establishes a gating mechanism for API access that conditions deployment on prior authorization and documentation of application-level risks. This structures Cohere's ability to assess …
This provision directly engages with regulatory requirements for human oversight in automated decision-making, including those established under the GDPR Article 22 and the EU AI Act for high-risk AI…
This provision allocates responsibility for AUP compliance to operators rather than Cohere, meaning that if an operator's application enables a prohibited use, the operator bears the compliance expos…
The clause operationally restricts the financial exposure Cohere assumes under the agreement by eliminating recovery categories and establishing a defined maximum liability threshold, regardless of t…
This clause establishes that Cohere makes no affirmative representations about service functionality, reliability, or fitness for user applications. The disclaimer operates as a baseline allocation o…
The provision establishes the operational and legal status of custodial cryptocurrency holdings during insolvency proceedings. This distinction between segregated customer assets and corporate assets…
This provision establishes the regulatory classification of Coinbase accounts and clarifies the deposit insurance status of assets held there. The clause operationally defines which federal insurance…
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure Coinbase assumes for platform-related incidents, regardless of the cause or the user's actual losses. This limitation applies across all categ…
This disclosure establishes the regulatory status of cryptocurrency assets held on the platform and informs users that the institutional protections applicable to traditional bank deposits and securi…
This provision discloses a material custodial risk: users holding digital assets on the Coinbase platform may not have segregated asset protection in a Coinbase insolvency, which could result in part…
This provision clarifies the regulatory classification and insurance scope applicable to crypto assets on the platform. It establishes that the federal insurance frameworks designed for traditional b…
The provision narrows the scope of recoverable damages by excluding common operational risks and market-based losses from liability. This allocation of risk affects the financial exposure Coinbase be…
The clause discloses the legal status of customer assets under insolvency, establishing that cryptocurrency holdings are not segregated from Coinbase's corporate assets and would be subject to bankru…
This liability structure allocates financial risk between the platform and users by establishing the maximum amount Coinbase can be required to pay in dispute resolution. The three-month fee cap crea…
The clause operationally limits Comcast's financial exposure by narrowing the categories of recoverable harm and establishing a monetary ceiling tied to recent service payments, which affects the sco…
The damages schedule is unusually specific and covers a wide range of common behaviors including viewing more than 1,000 pages in a day, sending unsolicited messages, or posting prohibited content, m…
The liability limitation operates to define the maximum financial exposure Craigslist assumes under the terms, establishing a threshold for all damage categories and creating a predictable liability …
This provision establishes the operational framework for service availability, specifying that the provider retains unilateral authority to alter service scope and that such changes operate without c…
This provision allocates all risk from automatically executed AI-generated code to the user, including system outages, data loss, and security vulnerabilities, which is operationally significant for …
This warranty disclaimer and liability limitation operates as a foundational allocation of risk between DeepSeek and users. By disclaiming all warranties and limiting liability exposure, the provisio…
This clause operates as a quantified liability limitation that defines the maximum financial exposure DocuSign accepts for any claim or dispute. The cap creates a defined ceiling for damages calculat…
For free or low-cost plan users, this cap may be as low as $100 regardless of actual harm caused, including harm from lost or compromised legally binding documents.
The provision creates jurisdiction-specific eligibility thresholds that DraftKings must enforce to comply with state gaming regulations. The clause also establishes that permitting underage participa…
The disclaimer establishes that Dun & Bradstreet makes no representations about the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of its services or data products. This provision defines the company's baseli…
This liability exclusion establishes the scope of recoverable damages in disputes with Dun & Bradstreet by categorically eliminating claims for indirect and consequential damages and restricting reco…
This clause attempts to eliminate virtually all financial liability for D&B, including for direct damages, which is broader than many standard limitation-of-liability clauses that cap but do not elim…
For organizations relying on Duo for access control to critical systems, the financial recourse available if the service fails is capped at one year of subscription fees, which may be far less than t…
This warranty disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Duo makes no affirmations regarding service quality, performance, or suitability for specific uses. The provision operates to limit Duo's …
This liability limitation defines the maximum financial exposure Egnyte accepts under the service agreement across all claim types and legal theories. The cap structure creates a predictable upper bo…
For businesses storing high-value or irreplaceable data on Egnyte, the cap on liability may be far lower than the actual cost of a data loss or prolonged outage event.
This provision allocates downstream legal liability to users rather than ElevenLabs for content generated using its tools, which has significant implications for enterprise API customers who may face…
The limitation establishes the maximum financial exposure Equifax assumes for failures or breaches in credit data management, which directly affects the remedies available to users through the disput…
This allocation of responsibility defines the operational scope of Eventbrite's obligations and liabilities. By limiting platform liability to organizer performance, the terms establish that attendee…
The provision defines Eventbrite's operational role and liability scope depending on which payment processing method the organizer selects, establishing whether Eventbrite maintains direct control ov…
This clause establishes FanDuel's position regarding the inherent security risks associated with digital information transmission and storage, placing the burden of understanding these risks on users…
This liability limitation defines the maximum financial exposure for Fastly in breach, negligence, or other claims. It operates as a risk allocation mechanism that restricts potential damages recover…
Even if Figma causes significant harm — such as loss of your data or business disruption — the agreement caps what you can recover financially, which may be far less than your actual losses. For free…
The clause sets contractual prerequisites for service use by conditioning access on both legal capacity and regulatory compliance, establishing that the agreement is enforceable only where users meet…
Organizations face full vicarious liability for all Org User conduct on the platform, which can include liability for unauthorized use, terms violations, or content policy breaches by any individual …
The clause narrows the categories of damages recoverable against Fitbit in disputes, limiting exposure to direct damages only and excluding entire classes of losses (consequential, punitive, and inta…
This provision clarifies the regulatory framework governing Fitbit's handling of health data. By disclaiming HIPAA-covered status, the terms establish that Fitbit's data practices are regulated under…
The liability cap restricts the monetary exposure for Fly.io across all claim categories, including implied warranty claims. This ceiling applies regardless of whether the underlying liability theory…
For businesses running critical applications on Fly.io, actual losses from a serious outage could far exceed three months of hosting fees, meaning this clause could leave customers with very limited …
For users buying or selling high-value sneakers worth hundreds or thousands of dollars, this cap means GOAT's maximum exposure for platform errors, lost packages, or other issues may be far lower tha…
The provision authorizes data collection and processing mechanisms but does not establish performance standards, accuracy warranties, or liability frameworks for fitness metrics. This creates an oper…
Consumers who use the AI Virtual Assistant to ask about their policy, coverage gaps, or premiums are being told upfront that any errors or omissions are their own responsibility, and that their conve…
If GEICO's website causes you harm, such as displaying incorrect policy information that leads to a coverage gap, the financial recovery available under this clause is functionally nil for most users…
The liability cap creates a defined ceiling on Google's financial exposure in dispute resolution, limiting recoverable damages to a specific monetary threshold rather than permitting claims for broad…
The provision operationalizes Google's risk allocation by defining the scope and ceiling of financial exposure across all potential claims. This establishes predictable liability boundaries for the c…
The liability limitation establishes the maximum financial exposure Google assumes for service-related disputes. This cap applies across all claim categories and warranty theories, establishing a def…
The liability limitation operates to define the outer boundary of Google's financial exposure in dispute resolution. By capping recoverable damages and categorically excluding certain damage categori…
This provision places the full burden of end-user data compliance, including consent collection, on the developer rather than on Google. Developers who have not implemented appropriate consent mechan…
The clause restricts the scope and amount of damages recoverable in disputes, establishing that only direct damages are eligible for recovery and only up to the specified monetary threshold. This aff…
For businesses with large or mission-critical deployments, actual losses from an outage or data incident could far exceed 12 months of fees paid, leaving significant financial exposure unrecoverable …
This provision allocates responsibility for output verification to the user and establishes a boundary on the service's intended use scope. It operationalizes the principle that Gemini Apps functions…
This provision limits the use of Gemini outputs as a basis for consequential decisions in regulated domains, which directly affects how the service may be deployed in enterprise or consumer-facing ap…
The provision creates an operational framework in which users bear responsibility for determining what information they input, while establishing that Google reserves authority to use submitted conte…
This clause establishes a use-based limitation that prevents the Google Maps platform from serving as infrastructure for derivative competitive products. The restriction operates at the dataset and s…
This clause establishes that you do not have a guaranteed permanent right to access content you have paid for, and limits your legal remedies to a refund if Google removes that content.
This clause operationally allocates payment liability to a single designated account holder rather than distributing it among individual purchasers, and extends that liability to transactions initiat…
The liability limitation defines the maximum monetary exposure Grammarly accepts for contractual and warranty disputes. This provision establishes a floor recovery amount of $20 regardless of actual …
The provision operates to constrain the remedies available in dispute resolution by excluding entire categories of damages and establishing a monetary ceiling on recoverable amounts. This affects the…
The limitation establishes the financial and categorical scope of recoverable damages in disputes with Groq. By excluding consequential damages and capping total liability at $100, the provision defi…
The cap creates a defined limit on Grubhub's financial exposure for all claims, regardless of the nature or extent of harm alleged. This establishes the maximum damages recoverable in any dispute and…
A 12-month fee-based liability cap limits the total financial exposure Gusto accepts for platform failures, payroll errors, or service disruptions to the amount the Employer paid for services in the …
This allocation of responsibility establishes the operational boundary between Gusto's service obligations and user obligations regarding data accuracy and regulatory compliance. It defines which par…
This provision establishes that Employer liability attaches to all account activity regardless of actual knowledge or authorization, including instructions provided orally by phone. This scope of lia…
For businesses that process large payrolls, the actual financial harm from a payroll processing failure could far exceed twelve months of Gusto subscription fees, leaving the employer-customer absorb…
This distinction has real implications for how disputes over clinical care are handled and which legal protections apply, including whether HIPAA obligations attach directly to Headspace or only to t…
This cap is particularly notable for a platform that delivers therapy and psychiatry services, where harm could potentially exceed the cost of a subscription; the $100 floor is a very low ceiling for…
The clause operates as a categorical exclusion from liability for entire classes of damages, meaning Hinge's financial exposure is confined to direct damages only and excludes consequential or intang…
For businesses whose operations depend heavily on HubSpot, the actual financial impact of a serious service failure or data incident could far exceed twelve months of subscription fees, leaving signi…
The clause narrows the categories of recoverable damages in disputes involving the service. By excluding indirect and consequential damages, the provision establishes a defined scope for potential li…
This provision grants the service provider unilateral authority to alter or terminate service availability without advance notice requirements, while contractually disclaiming liability exposure for …
The liability cap establishes the maximum financial exposure Ideogram assumes for user claims regardless of damage scope or cause. This structure allocates risk by limiting recoverable amounts to a d…
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on impact.com's liability that is directly tied to the contractual fee level, which may be substantially lower than the operational losses a client coul…
This cap limits the amount users can recover from Instacart for damages arising from use of the services, regardless of the actual harm suffered, subject to applicable law.
This allocation of responsibility establishes the operational framework for liability between the user and the service provider. The clause clarifies that the user's obligations extend to both input …
The limitation of liability structure reduces Jasper's financial exposure for certain damage categories and restricts the maximum recoverable amount to prior 12-month payments. This allocation of ris…
This provision clarifies the issuer relationship and regulatory structure for Klarna's credit products. WebBank's role as issuer means Klarna operates as a facilitator or servicer rather than the dir…
For a hardware wallet product whose entire purpose is securing cryptocurrency assets, an exclusion of liability for loss of digital asset access is a provision with direct financial implications for …
This exclusion materially reduces Ledger's financial exposure for a category of loss (cryptocurrency holdings) that represents the primary value users store through the platform. The provision establ…
This limitation narrows the scope of monetary recovery available through dispute resolution by categorically removing entire classes of damages from potential remedies. It establishes a procedural bo…
The scope limitation establishes the boundaries of Ledger's warranty obligation and defines which product failures trigger warranty remediation versus those the user bears responsibility for. This fo…
The allocation of risk at the point of delivery determines which party bears responsibility for product loss or damage during the transaction. This provision clarifies the contractual moment when the…
This limitation structures the financial risk allocation between Leonardo AI and users by defining a maximum recovery threshold tied to prior 12-month payments. The cap reduces the company's potentia…
The disclaimer establishes that Leonardo AI does not warrant non-infringement of third-party IP rights and transfers infringement liability to the user. This allocation of risk is operationally signi…
This liability limitation establishes the allocation of risk between Lime and users by narrowing the categories of damages for which Lime may be held responsible. The clause constrains potential liab…
The liability cap constrains the maximum financial exposure Lime faces for service-related claims and eliminates recovery categories that might otherwise exceed the specified monetary threshold. This…
If you suffer a loss connected to Lime's service, such as a billing error or a service failure, you may only be able to recover a very limited amount through arbitration, regardless of the actual har…
This provision establishes that advertisers bear the financial risk of fees generated by invalid activity and that LinkedIn's liability for technological issues is limited to issuing ad credits at it…
This provision explicitly excludes healthcare-related data use cases from the scope of the Services and disclaims all liability for prohibited data or high-risk activity use, which may affect healthc…
This provision clarifies the operational scope of Luma's compliance obligations by explicitly excluding HIPAA-regulated data from the scope of the service. It establishes liability boundaries by stat…
This disclaimer establishes that Luma AI assumes no responsibility for the functionality, performance, or actions of third-party AI tools operating within its service ecosystem. The liability exclusi…
The clause establishes the operational scope of autonomous agent functionality while allocating risk for third-party tool performance and actions to the user. It establishes Luma's liability position…
This provision establishes that when Luma's virtual agents or third-party AI tools take actions on behalf of users (such as interacting with external systems or the internet), all risk and liability …
This clause restricts the categories of damages for which Lyft may be held accountable in disputes, limiting exposure to consequential or indirect harm while preserving potential liability for direct…
This clause attempts to cap Lyft's liability for serious harms, though the phrase 'to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law' means courts may limit how far this exclusion actually reaches, p…
The independent contractor classification determines the legal relationship between Lyft and drivers, which affects applicable labor law obligations, benefit requirements, and regulatory compliance f…
This structure establishes the Terms of Use as a multi-document framework where enforceable provisions are distributed across region-specific pages rather than consolidated in a single document. User…
For businesses holding significant operating funds in Mercury accounts, this cap means that if Mercury makes an error resulting in financial loss, the recoverable amount under this agreement may be a…
The liability limitation defines the maximum financial exposure Mercury bears for claims related to the service. This cap operates as a contractual allocation of risk between the parties and applies …
The indemnification obligation establishes a mechanism by which Meta transfers certain legal defense and damages costs to users when third-party claims relate to user conduct on the platform, thereby…
The clause operates to define the scope of Meta's liability exposure by categorically excluding entire classes of damages from recovery, which shapes the risk allocation structure between Meta and us…
For users of free Meta services who have paid nothing, the liability cap is effectively $100, regardless of the type or magnitude of harm experienced, though the 'to the extent permitted by law' qual…
This clause restricts the scope of damages Meta may be required to pay in disputes arising under the agreement. It excludes categories of harm that typically represent the largest financial exposure …
The clause operationalizes Meta's data processing authority by specifying multiple independent legal grounds for collection and use, establishing that processing may proceed under legitimate interest…
This provision allocates legal compliance obligations to the advertiser rather than Meta, establishing that Meta's policy review does not substitute for the advertiser's own legal assessment. The cla…
Unlike a bank or custodial exchange, MetaMask has no ability to restore access to your wallet if you lose your recovery phrase, meaning a single mistake can result in total and permanent loss of your…
This disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that MetaMask makes no affirmative commitments regarding service performance, reliability, security standards, or suitability for particular uses. The p…
The liability cap operates as a contractual limitation on MetaMask's financial exposure in dispute resolution. This mechanism substantially narrows the scope of recoverable damages in any claim, incl…
The clause establishes the informational status of support materials and allocates responsibility for verification to the user, limiting MetaMask's representational obligations regarding the reliabil…
If MetaMask's services cause you to lose significant funds due to a technical failure, error, or other issue, the company's financial exposure is limited to a very small amount, leaving users to bear…
The clause allocates responsibility for third-party integrations by establishing that MetaMask's duty of care does not extend to linked external services, limiting the scope of MetaMask's operational…
This provision allocates responsibility for credential management and recovery to the user. ConsenSys's operational architecture does not include custodial storage or retrieval capabilities for authe…
This provision articulates Microsoft's operational principle for AI system design and describes available development tools for fairness assessment. The clause does not establish binding obligations,…
The clause operates to define the outer boundary of financial exposure for Microsoft across all claims, establishing a predetermined damage ceiling regardless of the nature or magnitude of alleged ha…
The liability cap operates as a contractual mechanism that defines the maximum financial exposure Microsoft assumes for any claim category. By establishing a floor of $10.00 and a ceiling tied to pay…
The provision establishes an institutional framework under which Microsoft designates certain application categories as requiring enhanced governance procedures prior to system deployment. This creat…
The provision creates a framework establishing developer accountability and human decision-making authority over AI system outputs. It institutionalizes the requirement for human involvement in conse…
The provision establishes the operational framework for AI content reliability expectations and defines the allocation of responsibility between the service provider and users. It establishes that Mi…
The liability cap establishes the maximum financial exposure Microsoft accepts under the agreement, restricting recoverable damages regardless of the nature or magnitude of claimed harms. This struct…
The agreement excludes consequential and indirect damages and caps total liability at 12 months of subscription fees, while requiring users to indemnify Midjourney against third-party claims arising …
The clause creates a contractually-defined statute of limitations that supersedes or supplements applicable state statutes of limitations. This establishes a procedural requirement that affects the t…
This provision places the full burden of End User compliance, including consent collection, on the commercial Customer rather than Mistral AI, meaning that if an End User violates the terms or applic…
The terms establish explicit prohibitions on non-consensual voice cloning and deceptive audio generation, and require legal disclosure of AI-generated audio content, while fully disclaiming Mistral A…
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure Mixpanel accepts under the service agreement across all claim types and legal bases, establishing a predictable ceiling for potential damages that de…
The agreement places affirmative export compliance obligations on the licensee, meaning organizations deploying or distributing NIM internationally bear legal responsibility for verifying that their …
The clause operates to restrict the financial exposure of both parties in disputes by establishing a defined ceiling on recoverable damages and categorically excluding entire classes of damages from …
The clause narrows the categories of damages available in disputes with Netflix by contractually restricting liability exposure to direct damages only, subject to statutory limitations that may overr…
This cap limits Noom's financial exposure even in cases of significant harm, including potential misuse or breach of sensitive personal health data, which could have consequences far exceeding the su…
The terms cap OpenAI's aggregate liability at the amount paid in the prior 12 months or $100, which means that even paid subscribers have very limited financial recourse against OpenAI for service fa…
The disclaimer and liability cap establish the scope of OpenAI's contractual obligations and financial exposure in breach scenarios. These provisions shape the allocation of risk between the service …
This disclaimer establishes the operational parameters under which the Services function, clarifying that accuracy assurance is not provided as a contractual obligation. It defines the division of re…
This provision creates a compliance obligation that flows through to every product built on OpenAI's API, meaning API operators cannot disclaim responsibility for prohibited uses by their own users.
This provision sets a low ceiling on what OpenAI would owe in most legal disputes, including those involving service failures, data handling issues, or other harm; for free-tier users, the cap is $10…
The clause establishes that OpenAI does not warrant the reliability of model outputs and allocates responsibility for output accuracy assessment to the user. This provision functions to limit OpenAI'…
This provision establishes an aggregate liability ceiling that is operationally narrow relative to the transaction values that may be involved in NFT marketplace disputes. Enforceability of this cap …
If your wallet is hacked or you lose access to your private keys, OpenSea has no obligation to help recover your assets, and the public visibility of your profile and transactions means your trading …
If an NFT you buy turns out to be fraudulent, a smart contract fails, or a transaction goes wrong, OpenSea's position is that it bears no responsibility, leaving users with limited recourse through t…
The cap operates to bound OpenSea's financial exposure for all disputes, including those arising from contract breach, tort, or strict liability, and applies across all claims simultaneously rather t…
This clause establishes the scope of damages Paramount may be required to pay in disputes. By excluding certain categories of damages, the provision reduces the potential financial exposure for the s…
This cap means that even if Paramount+ causes you significant harm (such as a data breach exposing personal information), the most you could recover in arbitration is a relatively small dollar amount.
This cap means that even significant harm caused by Patreon's platform could result in very limited financial compensation, particularly for creators who have not paid Patreon directly.
The exclusion establishes a distinction in coverage scope within PayPal's protection framework, meaning transactions processed through the friends and family channel operate under different terms tha…
This exclusion narrows the scope of remedies available in disputes by eliminating recovery for categories of harm that often represent the largest financial exposure in liability contexts. The operat…
This limitation of liability clause establishes the maximum financial exposure PayPal assumes under the user agreement. The cap applies uniformly across all dispute scenarios and substantially narrow…
The exclusion list defines the operational scope of PayPal's Purchase Protection coverage by specifying which transaction types fall outside program eligibility. This establishes a boundary between p…
This liability cap means that even if PayPal's actions cause significant financial harm, such as an extended fund hold on a merchant's account, the maximum amount recoverable from PayPal under this a…
This provision caps PayPal's total financial liability per incident at a level that may be substantially lower than actual financial harm experienced by business users with significant transaction vo…
This limitation of liability clause modifies the scope of recoverable damages in disputes involving service-related harms. By restricting liability categories and excluding intangible loss categories…
This provision sets a financial ceiling on Perplexity's aggregate liability to users, with a minimum cap of one hundred dollars applicable to free-tier users. The disclaimer of consequential and indi…
This provision means that if an employee or end user relies on a Perplexity AI output that turns out to be incorrect, the enterprise customer has no warranty claim against Perplexity. The terms place…
This provision explicitly states that AI-generated outputs are not warranted for accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any specific use, which has direct operational implications for users or organi…
This clause establishes that the Service is provided without quality or performance guarantees. The disclaimer applies to both the technical infrastructure and the substantive accuracy of AI-generate…
This provision places meaningful operational and legal responsibility on developers for conduct they may not be able to fully monitor or prevent, creating a compliance chain that developers must acti…
This provision allocates operational control and accountability to the user rather than to Pika for AI Self behavior. It establishes that the user's configuration decisions regarding the AI agent det…
If your AI Self generates harmful, defamatory, or misleading content in autonomous interactions with other users or on social media, these terms assert that you bear sole responsibility for those out…
Because Plaid handles sensitive financial data, a breach or system failure could cause significant financial or privacy harm, but this clause limits Plaid's liability to a nominal amount that likely …
The exclusion and cap establish defined boundaries on recoverable damages in disputes, which structures the risk allocation between Plaid and users under the agreement. The cap's specification means …
This clause establishes a broad cost-shifting mechanism that allocates financial and legal responsibility for certain claims to users rather than Poshmark. It requires users to cover Poshmark's defen…
This clause means that even significant harm, such as loss of proprietary API data or service outages affecting business operations, results in very limited financial recovery from Postman. Enterpris…
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure Postman accepts for service-related claims by categorically excluding certain damage categories and establishing a monetary ceiling, which shapes the…
If a platform outage, error, or data issue causes you to miss a trade or lose access to your account at a critical moment, this clause limits what you can recover from Public.com even if the failure …
This provision defines the risk allocation framework for margin trading accounts by explicitly disclaiming Public's liability for trading losses and establishing that users bear sole responsibility f…
This clause establishes the operational boundaries of the AI tool offering by defining its permissible use cases and allocating accuracy verification obligations. It establishes that Public does not …
This disclaimer operates to define the nature of content provided through the platform and to establish the scope of Public.com's responsibility for user reliance on that content. The provision clari…
This cap could leave users with very limited financial recourse even in cases of significant service failure, data loss, or security incidents, particularly for users on free tiers or low-cost plans …
This provision establishes Reddit's maximum financial exposure in dispute scenarios, which affects the practical remedies available to users and shapes the risk allocation between the platform and it…
This clause allocates liability risk by establishing that Replicate bears no responsibility for losses, damages, or claims arising from customer-provided data or models, shifting the burden of accoun…
Many users may not realize that models available through Replicate's interface are third-party products subject to their own terms, and that Replicate accepts zero liability if those models have secu…
The provision establishes Replicate's unilateral authority to alter the service architecture and feature availability without prior notification requirements, and eliminates liability exposure for th…
The agreement caps Replit's financial exposure at amounts that may be substantially lower than actual losses a user could suffer, including from service outages affecting production applications, dat…
This indemnification clause shifts responsibility to users for defending Replit against third-party claims related to user conduct or content. The obligation extends to legal and accounting costs, cr…
Many consumers treat Revolut like a bank account and may not realise their funds lack the straightforward FSCS guarantee. In a Revolut insolvency, recovery would depend on the safeguarding process an…
The provision sets operational boundaries for cryptocurrency functionality, including which assets are tradeable, how transactions are processed, and what regulatory or compliance requirements apply.…
This liability limitation establishes the scope of recoverable damages in disputes with Revolut by categorically excluding certain damage categories from liability exposure. The provision operates as…
The foreseeable loss standard narrows the scope of recoverable damages in breach scenarios by excluding consequential, indirect, or unforeseeable losses. The carve-out for negligence, death, and frau…
Recording laws vary significantly by state and country, and some jurisdictions require all parties to consent to audio recording. If your Ring camera records in violation of these laws, Ring's terms …
This cap means that even if you have spent hundreds or thousands of dollars on in-game purchases and suffer a significant loss due to Riot Games' actions, your maximum recovery under the agreement is…
The cap creates a defined upper bound on financial exposure for Riot Games across all claim categories (breach, negligence, or other causes), which operates to limit the amount recoverable in dispute…
The provision establishes the contractual framework for a high-risk trading product and ensures customers receive standardized risk disclosures before engaging in options trading. This serves to docu…
This provision authorizes Robinhood to liquidate all securities in a customer's account without prior notice or demand, which means customers using margin may lose positions at unfavorable prices wit…
This clause limits the types of financial harm users can seek compensation for in a dispute, excluding categories like lost investment profits or losses resulting from platform outages, which are dir…
Cryptocurrency assets held on Robinhood are not protected by SIPC or FDIC insurance, and the trading entity is a separate non-broker-dealer entity, which means users have different legal protections …
This provision clarifies the regulatory scope of investor protections available through the brokerage account structure. SIPC coverage limitations are material to account holders because they define …
The provision operationalizes Robinhood's regulatory duty to disclose material information about its advisory and brokerage services, enabling customers to understand the firm's relationship model, c…
This provision allocates risk disclosure obligations to the user and establishes Robinhood's unilateral authority to modify trading permissions based on its assessment of account suitability. The cla…
This liability limitation restricts the categories of damages recoverable against Robinhood in disputes, concentrating potential recovery on direct damages rather than consequential or speculative ha…
This provision operates as a disclosure of the regulatory status and insurance coverage applicable to cryptocurrency services offered through the platform. By clarifying that cryptocurrency is outsid…
This provision defines a core operational feature of margin accounts—the ability to leverage positions through borrowing—and establishes Robinhood's authorization to charge interest on borrowed capit…
The cash sweep mechanism operationalizes deposit insurance protection for account cash holdings by routing funds through FDIC-insured channels rather than holding uninvested cash at the broker. This …
This provision allocates contractual liability and responsibility to the parent or guardian rather than the minor user, establishing the parental account holder as the party responsible for complianc…
The liability cap creates a defined upper bound on Twilio's financial exposure across all dispute categories and legal theories. This establishes predictable cost parameters for service operations an…
The terms assert that Twilio's maximum financial exposure is limited to twelve months of fees paid, regardless of the actual magnitude of harm suffered by the customer, which may be significantly low…
This provision establishes Shopify's operational compliance framework with U.S. sanctions and export control law. The clause requires the platform to restrict service access for transactions that wou…
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure Shopify accepts for service-related claims and narrows the categories of damages recoverable. This structure allocates risk by excluding entire class…
This dual-role structure allocates data controller responsibilities between merchants and Shopify based on the purpose of data collection, which determines which entity bears primary accountability u…
For merchants whose annual sales volume or business losses from a service disruption or wrongful account termination could far exceed twelve months of platform fees, this clause materially limits the…
The clause operates to limit Slack's financial exposure in dispute resolution by restricting recoverable damages to a defined monetary ceiling and categorically excluding entire classes of damages fr…
For enterprise customers paying modest annual fees relative to their operational dependency on Slack, a major service outage or data breach could produce business losses that significantly exceed the…
The provision restricts the financial exposure of both parties in disputes by establishing a quantified upper bound on recoverable damages and categorically excluding certain damage categories from r…
The agreement caps Snowflake's total financial exposure to the prior year of fees paid, regardless of the scale of data loss, service outage, or other harm; organizations with high-value or sensitive…
The agreement explicitly excludes recovery for lost data and business interruption, which are among the most likely and significant harms that could arise from a cloud platform failure; this provisio…
This provision introduces a specific financial ceiling for data security and confidentiality breach claims arising from Cody use, which is operationally significant for organizations that negotiated …
For merchants who rely on payment proceeds to cover daily operating costs, a fund hold of up to 90 days can create serious cash flow problems, especially if the hold is triggered by an automated risk…
This provision allocates chargeback liability to the account holder rather than Square, establishing the operational framework for how chargeback-related financial obligations are handled. The clause…
The clause restricts the categories and types of damages recoverable in disputes against Stash and its Partner Bank to exclude consequential and indirect damages, thereby limiting the financial expos…
This clause severely limits Stash's financial accountability for decisions that could directly harm your investment portfolio, such as discontinuing an investment product or changing fee structures, …
The provision establishes the framework governing Valve's liability exposure under the agreement. By limiting recovery to direct damages only and excluding consequential damages categories, the claus…
The clause operates to restrict the financial exposure Valve assumes under the agreement by categorically excluding certain damage categories and capping aggregate liability at a fixed amount, which …
For high-value transactions on StockX, where a single purchase or sale could be worth thousands of dollars, this clause limits the platform's financial exposure to a fraction of the actual transactio…
Buyers purchasing high-value items such as limited-edition sneakers or designer handbags are relying on StockX's authentication as their primary protection, and this clause limits StockX's liability …
This clause defines the maximum financial exposure Strava accepts under the service agreement, establishing a predictable ceiling for dispute resolution outcomes. The mechanism ties liability exposur…
This liability limitation defines the maximum exposure Stripe accepts for breach, negligence, or other claims under the agreement, establishing a baseline recovery threshold that operates regardless …
The terms exclude Stripe's liability for indirect and consequential damages, including lost profits and lost business opportunities, which means businesses that suffer revenue losses due to Stripe se…
This provision establishes a unilateral operational mechanism allowing Stripe to restrict access to user funds based on its risk assessment, affecting liquidity and cash flow management for users dep…
The cap functions as a limitation on Substack's financial exposure across all dispute categories and creates a ceiling on recoverable damages regardless of actual harm claimed. This structure affects…
This clause structures the financial obligation associated with early service termination by accelerating the payment schedule for the remaining EIP balance. The provision applies uniformly across al…
The provision outlines T-Mobile's operational cybersecurity framework and the mechanisms through which the company implements security measures. It establishes that the company's cybersecurity progra…
If T-Mobile's service fails during an emergency or causes financial harm, the agreement limits T-Mobile's financial responsibility to your recent payments — which may be far less than the actual harm…
The liability limitation defines the maximum financial exposure Tabnine accepts for breaches, service failures, or other agreement-related claims. The mechanism operates as a threshold that restricts…
This provision limits the maximum financial recovery available to any user or entity against Tabnine to a nominal amount, which is particularly material for enterprise users who may experience signif…
The indemnification obligation establishes that users assume financial and legal responsibility for defending Tabnine against third-party claims connected to their use of the platform. This allocatio…
This clause caps Tabnine's financial exposure at a very low amount, meaning users who suffer significant losses from AI-generated code errors or service failures have limited financial recourse again…
The liability cap restricts the scope of financial remedies available through claims related to service use, establishing a defined ceiling for potential damages recovery regardless of the nature or …
This provision establishes a monetary ceiling on recoverable damages in disputes with Target, limiting aggregate liability to $100 for users who have made no purchases or minimal purchases in the pri…
Liability caps define the maximum financial exposure Target assumes for breaches, service failures, or other actionable claims. This provision creates predictability in the company's risk allocation …
This provision establishes a broad disclaimer of Taskrabbit's operational involvement in and liability for task outcomes, reinforcing the platform's characterization of itself as a marketplace interm…
This provision establishes the contractual classification of Taskers as independent contractors, which determines the applicable labor, tax, and benefits obligations between the parties. The classifi…
This clause allocates responsibility for Tasker selection to clients by defining the operational meaning of platform-generated descriptors as informational rather than evaluative or certifying statem…
The provision allocates liability risk by establishing TaskRabbit's operational role as a platform that does not directly perform, supervise, or control task execution or tasker conduct. This structu…
This broad disclaimer means that if a Tasker damages your property, performs work unsafely, or fails to complete a task, Taskrabbit's position is that it bears no legal responsibility, which places t…
This classification defines the legal relationship structure and determines which parties bear responsibility for worker status determinations, tax withholding, benefits provision, and employment law…
This provision defines the operational scope of TaskRabbit's credentialing system by clarifying that badge designations serve as markers of completed registration processes rather than comprehensive …
The liability limitation establishes TaskRabbit's maximum financial exposure per user and defines the boundaries of remedies available through the agreement. This cap applies to all claims categories…
This classification determines whether Taskers are entitled to employment protections and benefits; misclassification is actively contested in several jurisdictions and carries significant legal and …
This provision assigns all legal and regulatory compliance obligations for giveaway conduct to the organizing channel administrator, and Telegram's disclaimer of liability for prizes and regulatory s…
This clause restricts the damages recoverable in disputes with TikTok to direct damages only and establishes a maximum monetary recovery threshold. The provision operates to define the extent of TikT…
This provision allocates responsibility for safety verification and member vetting to users rather than the platform operator. It establishes the scope of Tinder's operational obligations regarding m…
This liability limitation establishes the maximum financial exposure Tinder accepts for service-related claims, regardless of the nature or magnitude of alleged damages. The cap applies to all disput…
If another user harms you through the platform, or if Tinder's service fails and you lose data or suffer financial consequences, Tinder's terms disclaim responsibility for most resulting losses beyon…
This clause defines the maximum financial exposure Together AI assumes under the agreement. It operates as a contractual limitation on damages recoverable across all claims, regardless of their natur…
The liability cap restricts the maximum financial exposure Together AI bears for service-related claims, establishing a defined ceiling on recoverable damages regardless of actual harm incurred. This…
This provision caps the financial recovery available to any user against Together AI, which may be particularly significant for users who experience losses exceeding the capped amount due to platform…
Many of the most significant harms from credit reporting errors, such as a denied loan, job rejection, or higher interest rate over years, are consequential damages that this clause attempts to exclu…
The exclusion operates to narrow the category of recoverable damages in disputes between TransUnion and users by eliminating liability for consequential and punitive damages. This provision establish…
This clause establishes the baseline warranty obligations (or absence thereof) that govern the contractual relationship between TransUnion and users. It defines the condition under which the service …
As a consumer reporting agency, errors in TransUnion's data can cause serious financial harm such as denied credit, higher interest rates, or employment rejections, but this clause attempts to limit …
This provision allocates legal compliance risk to the customer and establishes an indemnification obligation that requires the customer to cover Twilio's defense costs and damages in regulatory or th…
This provision places full accountability for account activity on the customer, including unauthorized third-party use, which means customers bear compliance and financial risk for how others use the…
The liability limitation defines the maximum financial exposure Twilio assumes under the service agreement and restricts the categories of damages available in dispute resolution. This structure allo…
This provision establishes broad liability limitations for Uber across a wide range of harm categories, including personal injury and property damage. The carve-out for applicable law means enforceab…
The provision establishes the financial exposure boundary for the platform across all dispute categories. By combining warranty exclusion with a defined damages ceiling, the clause structures the ris…
This provision establishes that users participating in CCAs may have their assets locked in smart contracts for indeterminate periods with no ability to access them, and assumes all resulting loss ri…
This provision asserts a structural and legal separation between Uniswap Labs as the Interface operator and the underlying Protocol as autonomous open-source smart contracts. This distinction is Unis…
Given that users may execute trades worth thousands or millions of dollars through the interface, a $100 liability ceiling means users bear virtually all financial risk for losses, even those caused …
The non-custodial structure defines the operational relationship between the platform and user assets: Uniswap provides application functionality but does not assume custodial obligations or correspo…
This disclaimer operates to allocate risk by establishing that Uniswap and its service providers make no affirmative assurances regarding the functionality, reliability, or suitability of the platfor…
The clause allocates operational control and execution authority to the decentralized protocol itself rather than to Uniswap Labs. This allocation affects the liability structure by clarifying the fu…
This provision delineates the legal relationship between Uniswap Labs and participants in token distribution events by establishing non-fiduciary status and clarifying that Uniswap Labs operates as a…
This disclaimer establishes the operational structure under which the Interface functions as a software tool rather than a trading platform operated by Uniswap Labs. The distinction allocates respons…
For studios that depend on Unity's platform commercially and pay substantial licensing fees, this cap means that if Unity's service fails and causes significant business damage, the financial recover…
The audit right extends to sensitive financial documents including tax returns and bank statements, which is broader than typical software audit clauses that focus on usage records rather than compre…
For freelancers who earn thousands of dollars annually through Upwork, this cap means that even a significant platform failure causing substantial income loss would result in minimal financial recove…
This classification affects whether freelancers are entitled to employment benefits, labor protections, and tax withholding, and it shapes whether Upwork bears any legal responsibility for working co…
The provision creates a procedural framework where Venmo's liability for unauthorized transactions depends on timely user notification. The operational significance lies in the 2-business-day deadlin…
For businesses running revenue-generating applications on Vercel, a platform outage or data incident could cause losses that vastly exceed 12 months of platform fees, making this cap a significant ri…
This clause restricts the categories of damages recoverable in disputes against Verizon by contractual definition, limiting exposure to direct damages only and excluding broader damage categories eve…
This clause sets a financial ceiling on Walmart's liability and excludes categories of damages that may represent the most significant real-world harm to consumers, such as consequential losses resul…
The liability cap creates a defined maximum financial exposure for Walmart across all service-related claims, while the exclusion of certain damage categories narrows the types of losses Walmart comp…
This liability limitation restricts the remedies available to users in disputes with Walmart by excluding entire categories of damages and establishing a monetary ceiling tied to user payments. The p…
This disclaimer establishes Waze's liability framework by specifying that the company makes no guarantees regarding service performance, accuracy of maps and routing information, or continuous availa…
This clause operates to define the outer boundary of Waze's financial exposure for claims related to service performance or contractual obligations. The cap applies regardless of the nature or magnit…
This clause establishes that Wealthfront provides its services on an 'as-is' basis without representations regarding functionality, reliability, or suitability for specific purposes. The broad discla…
The liability cap significantly restricts the maximum amount a user could recover in any dispute with Wealthfront, including disputes involving investment losses or inaccurate information provided th…
If you experience financial harm related to Wealthfront's website information or services as a non-Client User, this clause severely limits what you could recover through a claim based on these Terms…
The liability limitation defines the maximum financial exposure Wealthfront assumes under the agreement, which affects the scope of potential remedies available through dispute resolution or legal pr…
This clause limits the financial exposure Webull bears for damages resulting from claims by individual users. The cap operates as a ceiling on recoverable amounts regardless of claim type or the actu…
If Webull's platform has an outage, technical error, or data problem that causes you to miss a trade or lose money, the agreement asserts that Webull is not responsible for those lost profits or cons…
This provision establishes Webull's security obligations and specifies the procedural framework for breach response and user notification. The clause defines the scope of protective measures as 'reas…
The cap creates a defined upper bound on Webull's financial exposure across all categories of claims, including those based on implied warranties. This operates as a standard risk allocation mechanis…
The indemnification clause establishes a mechanism by which users assume financial and legal responsibility for defending Webull against third-party claims connected to their own conduct or service u…
The clause allocates responsibility for data accuracy between the service provider and the user. By disclaiming liability for data errors, the provision shifts the operational risk of relying on mark…
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure for both parties under the agreement and excludes categories of damages from recovery, which establishes predictable cost parameters for service deli…
The provision establishes an operational mechanism for account termination tied to payment method failure and structures the company's liability exposure for account deletion. This affects the condit…
This dual-role structure creates different regulatory and contractual frameworks depending on the processing context. When Windsurf acts as a processor, responsibility for data protection practices a…
The liability cap creates a defined financial boundary for Wise's exposure in dispute scenarios, establishing that recoverable damages are restricted to either recent payments made or a $25 minimum, …
This provision establishes a ceiling on Wise's monetary exposure to individual users that, for users who paid minimal fees, could be as low as $100, regardless of the amount of any disputed transacti…
The liability limitation establishes the maximum financial exposure Wise assumes under the agreement. The dual-threshold structure (12-month fee amount or $100 minimum) and the categorical exclusion …
The liability cap operates to define the maximum financial exposure Wix assumes for user claims regardless of claim category or damages theory. This mechanism establishes predictable liability bounda…
For businesses that depend on Wix to host customer-facing websites and generate revenue, actual losses from an outage or data loss could far exceed $1,000, leaving them with little financial recourse…
The disclaimer of accuracy and reliability warranties is particularly significant for enterprise customers deploying Writer in high-stakes use cases such as clinical trials, financial research, or le…
The clause operationally establishes Writer's liability posture by disclaiming warranties that would otherwise be implied under law, and by allocating to users the obligation to validate output quali…
This clause establishes a ceiling on Writer's financial exposure for any single claim or aggregate claims, which may be materially insufficient for enterprise customers whose use cases involve high-v…
The liability cap establishes a defined ceiling on Wyze's financial exposure in dispute resolution, which structures the risk allocation between the company and users by limiting recoverable damages …
Given that Wyze sells home security cameras and smart locks that protect residential spaces and capture sensitive video, a $100 maximum liability cap means a product failure causing significant harm …
The liability cap establishes the maximum financial exposure X assumes for claims arising from the Services, subject to both a floor amount and a time-based calculation. This structure defines the bo…
The liability cap operates to define the maximum financial exposure X assumes across all claims related to service provision. This establishes a ceiling on damages recovery regardless of the nature o…
The warranty disclaimer allocates risk to users by establishing that X makes no affirmative assurances regarding service quality, functionality, or fitness for specific uses. This provision defines t…
The liability cap establishes the outer boundary of X's financial exposure for any claims a user brings, regardless of the nature or magnitude of alleged damages. This provision defines the maximum r…
This clause limits X's total financial exposure to each user to $100 for free users, regardless of the nature or scale of harm claimed, which is a standard but significant limitation on consumer reme…
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure Yelp assumes under the agreement and operates to limit the scope of remedies available through dispute resolution procedures. This cap applies…
This provision establishes a maximum financial recovery ceiling for all claims against YouTube and its Affiliates regardless of claim type, which for most users who are not in revenue-sharing program…
The clause establishes the maximum financial exposure YouTube assumes for service-related claims, which shapes the remedies available to users and affects the allocation of risk between the platform …
This limitation of liability provision establishes the maximum financial exposure YouTube accepts for service-related claims and defines which damage categories fall outside YouTube's responsibility.…
This provision creates a dual compliance structure in which either the user (if 13+) or the parent/guardian (if enabling minor access) becomes the liable party under the terms of service. This alloca…
The clause restricts the categories of damages Zillow may be required to pay in the event of service disruption, third-party interference, or data breach, limiting financial exposure to direct damage…
This cap severely limits the practical financial remedy available to most users who have not paid Zillow directly, making it effectively impossible to recover meaningful damages even for significant …
The provision establishes ZipRecruiter's operational authority to unilaterally modify service access without advance notice requirements or liability exposure. The clause creates an asymmetrical cont…
The clause operates to restrict the damages recoverable in any legal proceeding against ZipRecruiter by excluding entire categories of losses—including lost profits, data loss, and goodwill—that migh…
This provision disclaims medical applicability of the genetic results, which limits the company's liability for health decisions made on the basis of its reports while also communicating a genuine li…
The indemnification obligation allocates financial and legal responsibility to users for defending the company against third-party claims connected to the user's conduct. This shifts litigation costs…
For users making consequential decisions based on AI-generated outputs (in business, legal, medical, or financial contexts), the absence of any warranty for accuracy or fitness for purpose creates me…
If a service outage causes you to lose business income or if a privacy breach causes significant harm, AT&T's maximum financial exposure to you is capped at your prior year's bills, which may be far …
This provision establishes that customers bear contractual liability for all activity under their AWS accounts, including activity resulting from account compromise, credential theft, or unauthorized…
The warranty disclaimer and liability cap establish the baseline risk allocation between AWS and users. These provisions define what remedies and recourse are available through the service terms if o…
This disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that the service provider makes no affirmative guarantees regarding service quality, performance standards, or fitness for user objectives. The provisio…
This indemnification clause establishes a mechanism by which Acorns transfers certain legal and financial defense obligations to users. The clause creates a broad scope of covered claims across four …
This provision establishes that Acorns makes no contractual warranties regarding service availability, performance, or fitness for purpose, which in the context of investment and banking services has…
If Adobe's services cause you significant harm, such as loss of important files, business disruption, or data breaches, the agreement severely limits the financial compensation you can recover from A…
The indemnification obligation establishes a mechanism allocating financial responsibility to users for legal claims and defense costs associated with their own actions or content on the platform, in…
For businesses with high transaction volumes but relatively low fee rates, the cap may be significantly lower than the actual financial loss caused by a platform outage or processing error.
If Affirm's service fails in a way that causes you financial harm beyond direct transaction amounts, such as a data breach or service outage affecting a time-sensitive payment, this clause limits you…
The provision operationalizes account closure authority by conditioning closure on payment satisfaction and preserving Afterpay's ability to pursue outstanding obligations post-closure. This establis…
Placing legal compliance responsibility for AI-generated content on the user, rather than the platform, is a significant liability allocation that consumers should understand before using AI features…
If Airbnb's platform causes you significant financial harm, the total amount you can recover from the company is capped at what you paid in service fees over the past year, which is often a small fra…
If something goes wrong during your stay, such as a listing not matching its description or a safety issue, Airbnb's terms position the company as a neutral intermediary rather than a responsible par…
Users who store important data in experimental or beta features risk losing access to that data if Airtable discontinues the trial feature without any obligation to provide notice, data export, or co…
This clause establishes use restrictions that AWS enforces through its operational control of the platform. The provision creates a contractual obligation that forms the basis for AWS to monitor, res…
This provision operationalizes Amazon's ownership structure for service content and establishes the legal framework protecting that content from unauthorized use or reproduction. It defines the scope…
The warranty disclaimer and liability limitation operate together to establish the scope of Amazon's legal responsibility for service performance and user harm. By disclaiming all warranties and excl…
The disclaimer eliminates Amazon's obligation to guarantee service quality, reliability, or safety standards. This allocation of responsibility establishes that users accept services in their current…
This indemnification clause shifts the financial and legal defense burden to users for third-party claims connected to their service use or violations. It establishes an obligation for users to bear …
This clause is operationally significant for security professionals, penetration testers, and researchers who use AWS infrastructure, as it requires documented authorization before conducting any sec…
This clause creates upstream liability for AWS customers whose platforms, applications, or resold services allow end users to use AWS infrastructure, meaning a violation by an end user may trigger en…
This disclaimer removes implied warranty protections that would otherwise apply under the UCC and state law, potentially limiting legal recourse for defective digital services or inaccurate informati…
This provision limits the categories of damages associates may pursue against Amazon in the event of a dispute, excluding consequential and lost-revenue claims; for associates whose primary business …
Passengers who are involuntarily denied boarding have federally mandated compensation rights that American is required to honor; the specific dollar amounts are set by DOT regulation and can be subst…
Disability accommodation rights under the ACAA and DOT regulations are statutory and cannot be contractually limited by the CoC; passengers with disabilities have enforceable rights to accommodation …
Because scheduled times are not part of the contract, passengers generally cannot claim compensation solely based on a flight being late unless DOT tarmac delay rules or other specific regulatory pro…
This provision establishes the maximum recoverable amount for international baggage claims, denominated in SDRs, and limits passengers' ability to seek compensation beyond the treaty-specified ceilin…
This provision reflects a DOT-mandated passenger protection; it is one of the few areas where the CoC directly incorporates a specific, enforceable consumer right with a defined time limit.
If your checked luggage contains items worth more than the liability cap and you did not declare a higher value, you may not recover the full cost of your loss from American regardless of fault.
This provision limits American's contractual obligations during irregular operations caused by external factors, which are among the most common sources of passenger disruption. The practical scope o…
This provision limits passenger recovery to direct damages only, excluding business losses, missed connections with independent consequences, and other downstream financial impacts. The enforceabilit…
This provision establishes procedural deadlines that, if missed, may bar passengers from pursuing compensation regardless of the merits of the underlying claim. The 24-hour domestic deadline is opera…
The Montreal Convention provides a minimum floor of liability protection for international passengers that American cannot contractually eliminate, but also sets a ceiling that may limit recovery in …
This clause means that in the event of a major data incident or prolonged service outage, the maximum financial recovery from Amplitude is limited to one year of subscription fees, which may be far l…
This provision limits the categories of damages users may recover from Ancestry in connection with service-related harm, including loss of data, and operates to the fullest extent permitted by applic…
Relying on Claude for investment decisions or financial advice is expressly prohibited and would be at your own risk, with no legal recourse against Anthropic for resulting financial losses.
The provision operates as a limitation on the permissible use of the service outputs, establishing that Claude.ai is not structured or authorized to function as a financial advisory platform. This cl…
This provision establishes Anthropic's characterization of large language models as frontier technologies with inherent limitations in accuracy and reliability, and places the verification burden on …
The liability cap means that regardless of the nature or extent of harm a user experiences in connection with the services, Anthropic's maximum financial exposure to that user is limited to a relativ…
This provision allocates responsibility for output verification to the user and establishes that accuracy of Outputs is not guaranteed by the service provider. It operates as a condition governing th…
The clause establishes a framework under which Anthropic retains discretionary authority to negotiate alternative use restriction terms with government entities, creating a carve-out from the standar…
This prohibition means users who rely on Claude for investment decisions do so outside the terms of service and without any regulatory protections that would apply to licensed financial advisers.
This carve-out means that the protections in this policy may not apply uniformly across all Anthropic deployments, and government-facing deployments may operate under a modified ruleset that is not p…
The liability cap at 12 months of fees and the exclusion of consequential damages, including lost profits and lost data, limits the financial recovery available to business customers if the Services …
This cap means that even significant harms caused by the service, including reliance on inaccurate AI outputs, may result in very limited financial recovery, which is especially relevant given the AI…
This provision creates a contractual carve-out that clarifies data governance responsibility in enterprise contexts. It establishes that when Anthropic functions as a processor rather than a controll…
The disclaimer eliminates implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for particular purpose, establishing that Apple bears no obligation to maintain continuous service operation or notify user…
The clause establishes that Apple bears no obligation to maintain continuous service operation or provide advance notice of service discontinuation. It allocates performance and availability risk ent…
Content you have purchased, such as movies, music, books, or apps, could become unavailable if Apple removes it from its servers or terminates its licensing arrangements, and the agreement expressly …
If Asana loses your data or the service causes you harm, the amount you could recover is very limited, and certain categories of loss, like lost business or corrupted data, are excluded entirely.
The twelve-month fee cap and exclusion of consequential damages mean that customers whose organizations suffer significant operational or financial harm from a service failure may have limited contra…
This provision places compliance accountability for all user activity on the contracting organization, meaning that policy violations by individual employees or contractors may expose the organizatio…
The disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Audible makes no guarantees regarding service operation, content quality, or fitness for specific purposes. The liability limitation restricts the c…
This provision establishes the boundaries of Audible's contractual obligations to users and, in conjunction with typical limitation of liability language in digital service agreements, may limit the …
If your login credentials are compromised and someone makes unauthorized transactions, your ability to recover those funds depends on how quickly you report the problem and whether you can demonstrat…
If an outage or error causes you financial harm beyond a direct transaction loss, such as a missed payment penalty or investment loss, you may not be able to recover those damages from the bank.
This disclaimer allocates responsibility for service defects and failures to the user rather than BeReal. By disclaiming all warranties, the provision establishes that users cannot rely on implied ob…
Limitation of liability clauses restrict your ability to recover compensation from BeReal if their service causes you financial or other harm, including loss of your data or account.
The liability limitation establishes the scope of potential damages BeReal may be required to pay in the event of breach or other claims. The provision anchors liability exposure to jurisdictional le…
This limitation restricts the categories of damages recoverable in disputes with Best Buy to direct damages only, establishing a defined scope of financial exposure in the company's liability framewo…
ERISA plan services carry distinct legal obligations for both Betterment (as a covered service provider) and employers (as plan fiduciaries), meaning the agreement governing this relationship has mat…
This disclaimer operates to limit the evidentiary weight that external awards or accolades carry in evaluating Betterment's service quality or performance claims. It establishes that awards should no…
Despite holding extremely sensitive financial data including SSNs and bank account numbers, Betterment's policy includes a standard disclaimer that no security system is impenetrable, which is standa…
This disclaimer operates to allocate informational risk to users by establishing that Booking.com makes no assurances regarding data quality or property representation. The provision limits Booking.c…
For businesses that rely heavily on Calendly for scheduling operations, this cap may be significantly lower than actual losses caused by a service outage, data breach, or other failure, particularly …
This clause defines the scope and limitations of the service offering by clarifying that Calm does not position its services as medical treatment or professional medical advice. This framing establis…
For users who have suffered financial loss, data exposure, or service failure, this cap means Calm's maximum financial exposure to any individual user is effectively US$50 or amounts paid, which may …
For users who may rely on Calm's content for mental wellness management, this disclaimer clarifies that no therapeutic relationship is created and that users assume full responsibility for their heal…
This warranty disclaimer operates to define the baseline condition of service delivery and allocates responsibility for service performance. The clause clarifies that Calm does not guarantee specific…
This provision limits the categories of damages users may recover from Canva in connection with Service failures, data breaches, or content-related losses, subject to applicable law. The clause is qu…
This provision caps the recoverable damages users may seek from Block, which is operationally significant given that Cash App handles financial transactions including peer-to-peer payments, investing…
This warranty disclaimer allocation defines the baseline condition under which the service is provided and establishes that Cerebras makes no assurances regarding the functional attributes, reliabili…
For businesses that have paid significant fees for API access or training services, this cap may be far lower than their actual losses from a service failure, data loss, or IP issue.
This disclaimer shifts responsibility to the user for any personal or third-party information they input into Cerebras AI services, which is relevant if a user inadvertently submits sensitive persona…
This allocation of responsibility means that account security and monitoring fall entirely within the account holder's operational purview. The disclaimer applies regardless of whether unauthorized a…
The clause allocates risk from the service provider to the user by establishing that content quality and accuracy are not guaranteed. This operates as a liability limitation that conditions user acce…
This provision places an affirmative conduct obligation on users rather than simply disclaiming platform liability, and it may interact with FTC guidance regarding AI systems that provide consumer-fa…
Chargeback liability is a significant financial risk for merchants, particularly in high-volume or high-value transaction businesses, and understanding the dispute resolution process is essential for…
If Chegg's services fail, causing you to lose access to study materials during a critical period, or if your data is mishandled, the terms limit what you can recover financially, excluding the types …
This disclaimer allocates risk by specifying that ClickUp makes no guarantees regarding the Services' performance, quality, or suitability for any particular use. The provision establishes the operat…
The disclaimer establishes that Cloudflare provides the Services without representations regarding performance standards, reliability, or suitability for specific use cases. This allocation of risk m…
Liability caps create predictable cost structures for service providers and define the outer boundary of financial exposure in the event of service failures or breaches. This affects risk allocation …
The twelve-month fee cap limits Cohere's maximum financial exposure regardless of the severity of a service failure or data incident, which is operationally significant for enterprise customers whose…
The clause creates a variable fee structure and reserves unilateral modification rights to Coinbase, meaning fee amounts are not fixed contractual terms but subject to change according to operational…
This clause limits the categories of damages users may recover from Coinbase in the event of service failures, unauthorized transactions, data breaches, or other platform-related losses, restricting …
The agreement establishes that users retain title to their digital assets while they are held by Coinbase, which is relevant to understanding user rights in the event of Coinbase insolvency or regula…
If Comcast's service failure causes you significant financial harm, such as lost work, damaged data, or business interruption, the agreement limits your financial recovery to a maximum of three month…
This provision caps Kit's financial exposure to users who experience data loss, service interruption, account suspension, or revenue loss attributable to platform failure or third-party conduct. For …
This provision establishes that Kit provides no contractual assurance regarding service availability, performance, or fitness for any particular use, which is operationally significant for users who …
This provision limits the categories of damages users may recover from Coursera in the event of platform failures, data loss, unauthorized access, or third-party misconduct on the platform. The carve…
This disclaimer means that even if course content is inaccurate, outdated, or the platform malfunctions, Coursera has contractually limited its liability for those failures, which may affect users wh…
The $100 liability cap means that even if Craigslist's platform causes you significant financial harm — through a security failure, data loss, or service outage — your maximum legal recovery against …
This provision establishes the scope of Cursor's security obligations as limited to commercially reasonable measures while allocating risk of transmission vulnerabilities and intentional security cir…
This disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Databricks makes no affirmative guarantees regarding the functionality, quality, suitability, or non-infringing nature of the service. The provisio…
This clause significantly limits the financial remedies available to users who suffer harm as a result of relying on Databricks website content or experiencing service problems, including data loss.
This provision limits the recoverable damages available to users for claims arising from website use to potentially nothing, as the clause excludes both direct and indirect damages without stating a …
This cap can be very low relative to the potential business harm caused by a translation error or service failure, particularly for enterprise customers who rely on DeepL for high-stakes communicatio…
This provision establishes a ceiling on DeepL's financial exposure per subscriber claim. The clause is conditioned on applicable law, which preserves mandatory statutory liability under German law an…
The clause establishes a tiered liability framework that narrows DeepL's exposure for negligence claims based on breach severity and damage type. This structure defines the scope of financial obligat…
This clause limits the financial exposure DeepSeek faces if the model causes harm, meaning that organizations or individuals harmed by model outputs would need to seek recourse from the deploying org…
This clause limits the categories of damages a licensee can recover from DeepSeek in the event the model causes harm, excluding consequential and indirect damages, which are often the most significan…
This clause means that organizations deploying DeepSeek-R1 in commercial products cannot rely on any warranty from DeepSeek regarding model quality, safety, or fitness for purpose, and must independe…
This provision establishes the ownership framework for website content and notifies users of the intellectual property protections applied to Delta's digital materials. It clarifies the scope of Delt…
If Descript loses your content, its systems fail, or you suffer financial harm from reliance on the platform, these terms significantly restrict your ability to recover damages from the company.
The agreement asserts a broad exclusion of liability for consequential, incidental, punitive, and indirect damages, which limits the financial recovery available to users who experience harm from pla…
For a platform used to execute legally binding documents, the complete disclaimer of fitness for a particular purpose means DocuSign accepts no responsibility if its service does not meet the legal o…
Liability caps restrict the financial remedies available to users if they suffer harm related to DoorDash's Services; the practical scope of this limitation depends on the specific cap amount and app…
The terms assert that DoorDash provides its Services without warranty, which limits users' ability to seek remedies for service failures; however, the agreement acknowledges that applicable law in ce…
If Dropbox loses your files, suffers a data breach, or becomes unavailable and you suffer losses as a result, this clause substantially limits or eliminates Dropbox's financial obligation to compensa…
Because D&B's business credit scores and data are used by lenders, suppliers, and partners to make consequential decisions about businesses, a blanket disclaimer of data accuracy has practical signif…
This clause places the operational and legal burden of managing all end-user activity squarely on the customer organization, meaning that misuse by an employee or misconfiguration by an admin is the …
Because Duo is a security product, the explicit disclaimer that the service is not warranted to be 'completely secure' is particularly significant for organizations deploying it as a primary authenti…
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure Duolingo assumes under the service agreement and restricts the categories of compensable harm to direct damages only. This structure allocates…
This disclaimer allocates responsibility by establishing that Duolingo does not guarantee specific performance standards, availability metrics, or freedom from defects. It establishes the baseline co…
This cap means that even significant harm caused by a platform failure or data breach may result in minimal financial recovery for the average user, particularly free-tier users who have paid nothing.
For users who spend significant amounts on in-game content over time, this cap means that even if Epic is responsible for a major loss of access or financial harm, your legal recovery is capped at a …
For a company whose core product is credit data accuracy, a blanket warranty disclaimer is notable because it means contractual remedies for inaccurate credit information are limited, though your sta…
A liability cap from a company that manages sensitive financial data for hundreds of millions of Americans means that contractual damages for mishandled credit information may be limited, though FCRA…
For event organizers whose events generate substantial revenue through Eventbrite's platform, the limitation of liability to amounts paid to Eventbrite rather than amounts processed through Eventbrit…
The clause disclaims liability for a very wide range of potential harms, including data interception by unauthorized parties, which FanDuel explicitly acknowledges may occur during platform use.
For businesses that depend on Fastly's platform to generate revenue, the liability cap may be far smaller than the actual financial harm caused by a serious service failure, leaving the customer to a…
The warranty disclaimer allocates risk to the user by establishing that the Service is provided without quality or performance guarantees. This provision defines the baseline contractual obligations …
This clause establishes that Figma's obligations are limited to those expressly stated in the contract. By disclaiming implied warranties that would otherwise arise under applicable law, the provisio…
If Figma experiences a data breach, outage, or other failure that causes you to lose work or suffer financial harm, this clause limits your ability to recover those losses from Figma.
For a platform that collects sensitive health and biometric data, a maximum liability of one hundred dollars is a very low ceiling if a data breach or service failure causes real harm.
For a health tracking device and service, the absence of reliability warranties is particularly notable, as users may depend on Fitbit data for wellness monitoring.
If you suffer financial loss or harm from a transaction gone wrong, a security breach, or another user's conduct on Fiverr, the platform's contractual liability for consequential or indirect losses i…
The disclaimer allocates risk to the user by removing Fly.io's obligation to warrant service performance, availability, or suitability for particular applications. This is a standard risk allocation …
This clause limits your ability to seek compensation from Ford for problems arising from using their website, even if those problems result from errors or issues on Ford's end.
This clause establishes that Ford makes no affirmative representations about the site's performance, reliability, or suitability for any specific use case. It allocates risk to the user by stating th…
Accuracy disclaimers for health and fitness metrics define the boundaries of Garmin's liability if a user relies on inaccurate data from their device for health or safety decisions.
If you rely on GEICO's website for policy information, premium quotes, or coverage details and that information turns out to be wrong or outdated, GEICO has disclaimed any warranty of accuracy, limit…
This warranty disclaimer establishes the contractual baseline for GEICO's obligations regarding website performance and content accuracy. The clause defines the scope of remedies available to users b…
This clause means that if someone gains access to your GEICO account password, they can make changes to your policy or personal information and GEICO will carry out those instructions, with limited l…
This warranty disclaimer establishes that GitHub makes no affirmative representations about the service's performance, reliability, or suitability for specific uses. The clause operates to limit GitH…
The limitation of liability clause restricts users' ability to recover indirect, consequential, or incidental damages from GitHub, including loss of data or profits, even in cases of service failure …
This cap means that even if Glassdoor's actions cause significant harm, such as a data breach or unlawful account termination, your financial recovery is severely limited regardless of the actual los…
The clause sets baseline behavioral standards that Google enforces through its service terms, establishing grounds for service suspension or termination and creating contractual obligations that bind…
The disclaimer operationalizes Google's liability structure by establishing that users accept services without warranties regarding performance, availability, or suitability for specific needs. This …
This provision frames Google's operational approach to bias management in AI development. It establishes a procedural standard under which Google commits to systematic bias identification and removal…
This provision frames safety and human oversight as foundational design principles for Google's AI development, establishing an operational commitment to apply safety practices during development and…
This principle establishes an operational framework for AI system design that incorporates accountability structures. The provision places responsibility on Google to maintain human oversight and use…
This restriction defines operational boundaries for Google's AI development and deployment activities. The clause establishes commitments regarding categories of applications that fall outside the sc…
For free services, this cap effectively limits Google's liability to zero in many scenarios. The clause includes a carve-out for situations where local law does not permit such limitations, which is …
This disclaimer establishes the baseline warranty framework by limiting Google's affirmative promises to only those explicitly stated elsewhere in the agreement. The operational significance is that …
This provision establishes a significant asymmetry in financial exposure: for account holders using the free tier of Google Analytics (GA4 Properties and UA Properties under 10 million Hits), Google'…
This clause allocates legal defense responsibility and financial exposure to users for claims connected to their conduct. The provision establishes Google's right to require users to cover the entity…
This warranty disclaimer allocates risk between Google and users by establishing that Google makes no guarantees about service performance, content quality, or reliability. The provision operates to …
This provision caps potential developer recovery at 12 months of fees paid, which may be a modest amount for developers on free-tier or low-spend plans. It limits financial recourse in the event of s…
This clause links liability for data processing failures to the broader commercial liability framework in the Google Ads Terms of Service. Advertisers should review those terms to understand the fina…
This provision limits Google's stated contractual responsibility for transaction outcomes, refunds, and chargebacks, and directs dispute resolution to card issuers and merchants. The enforceability o…
This disclaimer allocates warranty risk to the user by establishing that Google's obligations are limited to those explicitly enumerated in the agreement. The provision defines the scope of Google's …
The provision establishes operational guidance regarding data submission practices. It clarifies that user-submitted conversations may be accessed by reviewers and potentially used to improve Google …
The restriction establishes operational boundaries for how cached map data may be retained and deployed within API implementations. The 30-day geocode caching window with mandatory deletion creates a…
This clause establishes protections for Google's proprietary technology by restricting access to the Maps APIs' internal architecture and implementation details. The provision operates as a condition…
This clause means that if a Maps API outage or error causes significant business loss, your ability to recover damages from Google is substantially limited.
This clause allocates liability and compliance obligations to account holders rather than to minors themselves, establishing clear lines of responsibility for parental oversight. It conditions minor …
This means Google is not responsible for resolving purchase disputes, refund issues, or problems with goods and services purchased through Google Pay, which limits your recourse against Google when t…
This clause means that if Grammarly loses your data, its AI gives you bad advice that causes harm, or the service fails in a way that costs you money, your ability to recover financial compensation t…
This disclaimer allocates risk by establishing the baseline contractual position that the service is delivered without performance guarantees. The provision defines the scope of Grammarly's obligatio…
This disclaimer allocates risk by defining the scope of Grindr's obligations regarding service quality and security. By disclaiming warranties of performance and security, the provision establishes t…
If a data breach exposes your HIV status or sexual orientation, or if you suffer real-world harm as a result of Grindr's data practices, this clause attempts to prevent you from recovering consequent…
This clause establishes the baseline warranty structure governing the service relationship. By disclaiming all warranties, the provision defines that Groq makes no representations regarding the quali…
Users who primarily interact with Groq through its AI services are governed by a separate agreement that may have materially different terms around data use, liability, and rights.
This indemnification clause allocates certain litigation and defense costs to users when their conduct gives rise to third-party claims against Groq or its affiliates. The provision establishes a fin…
If Grubhub's service causes you harm beyond a direct, quantifiable loss, such as a missed event due to a failed delivery or data loss, this clause significantly limits what you could recover even if …
An 'as is' warranty disclaimer limits the warranties Gumroad provides with respect to service availability, functionality, and fitness for purpose. The practical effect of this clause depends on appl…
For a platform processing time-sensitive payroll and tax filings, a disclaimer of all uptime and accuracy warranties means employer-customers bear the risk of platform outages or processing errors oc…
This provision establishes that Employers bear contractual responsibility for Administrator compliance with the full agreement, including conduct of third-party accountant administrators, without Gus…
Payroll errors caused by incorrect data entry remain the legal and financial responsibility of the employer, even though Gusto is the platform processing and transmitting the payroll and tax filings.
This clause defines the scope and limitations of the service offering by clarifying that Headspace operates as a wellness platform rather than a medical provider, establishing the operational boundar…
This disclaimer eliminates Headspace's liability for defects, malfunctions, or unsuitability of the service. It establishes that users bear the risk of service performance and quality, and Headspace …
This provision establishes the maximum financial recovery available to either party in the event of a breach or claim, capping HubSpot's liability at twelve months of fees paid and excluding categori…
If any member of your team misuses HubSpot or violates the terms, your entire organization's account can face consequences, including suspension, even if you were unaware of the violation.
This provision allocates content responsibility to individual users rather than to Hugging Face, establishing a foundational obligation that defines the scope of user liability for platform activity.…
Intended use declarations define the scope of responsible use as understood by the model publisher, and out-of-scope use declarations may be relevant to liability allocation if a model is deployed in…
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure Hugging Face accepts for service failures, data loss, or other claims. This mechanism establishes predictable risk allocation between the serv…
Subscribers paying a premium for an ad-free experience should be aware that the agreement preserves Hulu's right to show certain ads and promotional content even on paid ad-free plans, which may not …
The clause delineates the boundary of Hulu's operational responsibility by removing advertiser conduct and user-advertiser interactions from the scope of Hulu's contractual obligations, thereby limit…
A subscriber who fails to pay or has payment failures may face liability significantly exceeding the original subscription cost, including legal and collection fees.
If Ideogram's service causes you significant harm, such as loss of commercially valuable generated content or a data breach, your ability to recover meaningful compensation through the agreement's te…
This provision, combined with the twelve-month liability cap, means that users have limited contractual recourse if the platform experiences tracking failures, data loss, or service interruptions tha…
For most job seekers who use Indeed for free, this cap means the maximum recovery in any dispute is $100 regardless of the actual harm suffered, including harms from data breaches, wrongful account t…
The liability limitation establishes Indeed's maximum exposure framework by categorically excluding entire classes of damages from recoverable compensation. This provision operates to narrow the scop…
The liability limitation defines the maximum financial exposure Instacart assumes under the agreement and establishes which damage categories fall outside the scope of recoverable losses. This provis…
The provision clarifies the operational and legal structure of the service delivery model by defining the scope of Instacart's responsibility and control over third-party performance. This distinctio…
The indemnification clause allocates legal and financial risk to users by obligating them to cover Instacart's defense costs and damages in disputes where user conduct is the basis for third-party cl…
This provision allocates legal liability for alcohol sales compliance to retail partners rather than Instacart, and requires users to affirmatively represent their legal drinking age, which may affec…
This clause allocates operational responsibility by clarifying the legal and contractual relationship between Instacart and service providers. It establishes that Third Party Providers function indep…
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Jasper's liability exposure per claim, which affects the maximum recovery available to users regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm allege…
This provision establishes that Jasper makes no warranty representations about service performance, suitability, or output quality, which affects user expectations and recourse for service-related is…
The indemnification clause allocates legal and financial responsibility to users for losses Khan Academy incurs related to user conduct or service usage. This establishes a mechanism by which Khan Ac…
If something goes wrong with the service and causes you harm, this clause limits what you can recover from Khan Academy, potentially including situations where student learning data is lost or corrup…
The disclaimer establishes that Khan Academy provides the Services without guarantees of quality, performance, or suitability for specific purposes. The liability limitation restricts the damages Kha…
If Kick's platform causes you to lose streaming income, audience data, or other value, this clause attempts to limit your ability to recover those losses, which is particularly significant for creato…
This warranty disclaimer defines the baseline conditions under which Kick delivers its platform and establishes the scope of Kick's obligations regarding service quality and technical performance. Th…
This clause means that content you paid to access could become unavailable or change format without Amazon owing you a refund or compensation, which is a significant risk for consumers who build digi…
This provision authorizes Amazon to alter or remove content from user devices after purchase without advance notice and without incurring liability under the terms, which operationally affects the re…
When your lender is WebBank rather than Klarna itself, your loan agreement and certain consumer protections are governed by WebBank's terms and federal banking law, and regulatory complaints may need…
This provision identifies the actual credit issuer and establishes the institutional structure for lending services. WebBank, not Klarna, serves as the lender responsible for credit decisions, underw…
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Klaviyo's exposure to any individual claim, meaning users cannot recover damages exceeding their annual platform spend regardless of the nature or ma…
For businesses running production AI workflows on LangChain's platform, the liability cap may limit available remedies in the event of data loss, service outages, or platform failures that cause down…
A one-year warranty against defects is a baseline protection, but the broad exclusions for misuse or improper use could be interpreted to deny warranty claims in ambiguous situations.
This clause allocates liability risk between Leonardo AI and users by clarifying that Leonardo AI's liability does not extend to independent third-party integrations. This carves out a category of se…
This cap means that even if you suffer significant financial or other harm from the platform, your ability to recover damages is limited to a relatively small amount, which may be substantially less …
This disclaimer means that if an AI-generated output causes you harm, financial loss, or you rely on it as professional advice, Leonardo.Ai's position is that it bears no responsibility for those out…
This provision establishes a broad limitation of Leonardo AI's financial exposure across all categories of indirect harm, which is operationally significant for users who experience data loss, servic…
The clause narrows the scope of monetary recovery available through dispute resolution by categorically exempting specific damage types. This limitation affects the remedies structure available to ei…
This provision establishes a mutual damages cap that, in practice, may result in very low absolute liability limits for advertisers with modest monthly ad spend. The carve-outs for payment, confident…
The agreement limits LinkedIn's total financial liability to users to a maximum of $1,000 or three months of fees paid, which means that even significant harm arising from use of the platform may res…
This provision establishes a conditional payment liability structure for agencies that is available only to those approved for monthly invoicing. The agency's ability to rely on Sequential Liability …
This provision establishes that LinkedIn makes no contractual assurances about service availability, functionality, or performance standards. The disclaimer operates to define the scope of LinkedIn's…
This provision limits the financial exposure Mailchimp accepts for service failures, data loss, or other claims to a ceiling that may be substantially lower than actual user losses, particularly for …
This provision allocates the burden of agreement acceptance to continued user conduct rather than explicit consent. It establishes that the agreement terms apply through the operational mechanism of …
This clause means that if you lose income, data, or business opportunities because of a Medium platform failure or security breach, your ability to recover damages from Medium is substantially limite…
For businesses relying on Mercury for critical financial operations, the disclaimer of any warranty of uninterrupted service means you have no contractual assurance of platform availability, even dur…
Limitation of liability clauses define the financial exposure the service provider accepts and establish the boundaries of remedies available to users through the agreement. This affects how disputes…
This provision allocates data governance responsibility by establishing that MetaMask does not assume liability for or control over data handling by third-party dApp developers. It clarifies the scop…
This commitment creates operational standards for AI system validation and ongoing performance monitoring. It establishes a framework where deployment is conditional on pre-release testing and post-d…
This provision articulates Microsoft's internal governance structure for AI development by establishing a documented framework that teams are expected to follow during system development and deployme…
These governance bodies represent Microsoft's stated internal oversight structure for AI; the document does not disclose the scope of their authority, decision-making processes, or whether their reco…
This provision sets forth the institutional framework under which Microsoft's AI products are developed and evaluated. The commitment establishes operational standards that apply across the entity's …
This provision describes the safety testing and harm mitigation processes Microsoft states it applies to AI systems, which is relevant to consumers and regulated entities assessing the risk profile o…
This provision addresses whether human review exists over AI decisions, which is relevant to individuals who may be affected by automated decisions made by Microsoft AI systems in consequential conte…
This provision states a safety commitment relevant to all users of Microsoft AI products, particularly in high-stakes contexts such as healthcare, infrastructure, or safety-critical applications wher…
This principle addresses human oversight and organizational accountability for AI outcomes, which is relevant to enterprise customers deploying Microsoft AI in consequential decision-making contexts …
The clause establishes that Microsoft assumes no obligation to warrant service quality, fitness for particular purposes, or merchantability. This allocation of risk means users do not receive standar…
This provision states Microsoft's commitment to maintaining human accountability for AI decisions, which is relevant to enterprise customers who may face regulatory or legal accountability for AI-dri…
This provision establishes that policy liability resides with the advertiser account regardless of whether the ad content was created or submitted by a third party, meaning advertisers bear enforceme…
If you use Azure services, the full scope of your legal rights and obligations cannot be determined from any single document and requires reviewing multiple agreements specific to each product or ser…
SLAs govern what compensation or credits you may receive if Azure services experience downtime, and the specific terms vary by product, meaning some services you use may have stronger or weaker uptim…
If a Microsoft service fails and causes you significant harm, such as loss of important data or business disruption, you may be unable to recover the full extent of your losses because of this liabil…
The liability cap restricts the financial exposure Midjourney faces in disputes, establishing a ceiling on potential damages that users may recover regardless of the nature or scope of claimed losses…
The clause establishes the company's security standard as commercially reasonable rather than absolute, which defines the operational baseline for data protection obligations under the agreement. Thi…
This warranty disclaimer allocates risk to the customer by establishing that Midjourney does not represent or guarantee the condition, functionality, or performance characteristics of the Services or…
This disclaimer allocates content liability away from the service provider to individual users. By disclaiming responsibility for monitoring and review, the provision establishes that content moderat…
If Miro's service fails and you lose board content or suffer business disruption, these terms limit the financial remedy available to you, which is particularly relevant for businesses that rely heav…
This warranty disclaimer operates as a liability allocation mechanism that defines the scope of Miro's undertakings regarding service quality and performance. By disclaiming implied warranties, the p…
For free users, the maximum compensation Mistral AI could owe is 50 euros regardless of the harm caused. This provision significantly limits users' ability to recover financially in the event of a se…
Organizations that build workflows or customer offerings dependent on Beta Products bear the full operational risk of sudden access termination and have no warranty protections if Beta Products malfu…
This disclaimer is directly relevant to liability allocation: by placing the obligation to verify output accuracy on the Customer, the terms support Mistral AI's position that it is not responsible f…
This provision allocates responsibility for third-party service performance and data handling to the third-party service provider rather than Mistral AI, establishing clear boundaries between Mistral…
The 90-day advance notice requirement, jointly selected auditor, and customer-borne costs collectively create a high practical threshold for exercising on-site audit rights, which may limit their uti…
Users interacting with AI products built on Mistral AI's models outside the company's own platform are not protected or governed by this policy, and should look to the deploying organization's own po…
The provision delineates the scope of Mistral AI's operational responsibility by excluding third-party integrations from its liability framework. This establishes a boundary between Mistral AI's acco…
This disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Mixpanel assumes no warranty obligations regarding service performance, reliability, or data quality. The provision narrows the scope of remedies a…
Liability caps limit the financial recovery available to a business customer if Mixpanel's service failure, data breach, or contract violation causes harm. The practical effect depends on the cap amo…
The agreement provides no warranty that the software will function as expected, be fit for any particular enterprise purpose, or be free of IP infringement claims, transferring all performance and IP…
The agreement excludes a broad range of damage categories that are often the most significant in enterprise AI deployment failures, including lost profits, data loss, and business interruption, which…
This provision significantly limits your ability to recover damages from Netflix if the service fails, is unavailable, or causes harm, though the clause includes a carve-out acknowledging that non-wa…
This provision allocates risk by limiting Netflix's liability exposure for service disruptions or technical failures and by precluding damage awards beyond direct losses. The consequential damages wa…
The waiver of consequential and indirect damages limits the types of losses users can claim against Netflix in disputes, which may affect the practical remedy available for service outages or content…
The provision allocates risk by limiting Netflix's liability exposure for service disruptions and performance issues while carving out statutory consumer protections that cannot be waived under manda…
The provision structures Netflix's liability framework by disclaiming warranties for service performance and limiting the categories of damages recoverable in disputes. This allocation establishes th…
This warranty disclaimer operates as a baseline limitation on Netflix's service obligations and reduces potential liability exposure by establishing that service interruptions or technical errors do …
The provision operates to allocate risk between Netflix and users by establishing a baseline service condition and constraining the scope of financial liability Netflix may face for service interrupt…
The warranty disclaimer and damages limitation establish the service availability standards Netflix commits to and define the scope of liability exposure in the agreement. This provision operationali…
This provision establishes Netflix's liability framework by disclaiming operational guarantees and restricting the categories of damages recoverable in disputes. The clause incorporates a carve-out f…
The provision allocates risk by limiting Netflix's liability exposure for service disruptions and performance issues to direct damages only, while carving out exceptions for mandatory consumer protec…
The clause constrains the scope of remedies available in disputes by categorically excluding entire classes of damages from potential recovery, thereby narrowing Netflix's financial exposure in liabi…
If you lose access to digital purchases, game saves, or other account-linked content due to a service failure or termination, these terms limit your ability to recover those losses from Nintendo.
The disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Nintendo makes no guarantees regarding the condition, functionality, or suitability of its platforms and services. This provision operates as a foun…
This disclaimer limits Noom's liability for health outcomes resulting from following its program, even though users share sensitive health data and receive coaching that influences health behaviors.
This disclaimer establishes the operational scope of Noom's service model and allocates responsibility for medical decision-making to users and their healthcare providers. It defines the legal bounda…
This disclaimer establishes the operational scope and intended use of the Services. It allocates responsibility by defining what Noom's Services are explicitly not designed to provide, thereby clarif…
The specification of data security practices creates operational standards for how the service handles personal information and establishes the framework against which the service's data protection o…
This provision places responsibility on users to verify AI-generated content, which is significant for anyone using NotebookLM to summarize, analyze, or research important topics, as errors in output…
Business customers are governed by this agreement rather than the personal terms, and it likely contains distinct provisions on data processing, liability caps, and dispute resolution that differ mat…
Individual consumers using Notion's free or personal paid tiers are governed by this agreement, which defines their rights regarding data, account termination, dispute resolution, and content ownersh…
This clause significantly limits what you can recover from Okta if the website or its terms cause you harm, which is particularly relevant if you rely on Okta's public resources for business-critical…
This disclaimer limits OpenAI's liability for harms arising from reliance on AI-generated content, and places responsibility on users to independently verify outputs before acting on them in conseque…
The provision allocates intellectual property rights to users while limiting OpenAI's liability for output duplication or similarity across user base. This establishes a baseline ownership framework …
This provision limits the financial exposure OpenAI accepts for service-related claims to a maximum of $100 for most users who have not paid fees. The exclusion of consequential and indirect damages …
This clause establishes the maximum financial exposure OpenAI will bear for claims under the agreement, which defines the scope of recoverable damages in any dispute regardless of the nature or amoun…
This provision establishes that safety responsibility is shared between OpenAI and API operators, and that operators who deploy GPT-4o in sensitive contexts cannot rely solely on OpenAI's mitigations…
The liability limitation establishes a defined ceiling on monetary exposure for OpenAI and its affiliated parties in dispute scenarios. This mechanism affects how damages are calculated in any claim …
The medium cybersecurity risk rating indicates that OpenAI determined GPT-4o provides some level of capability relevant to cyberattack assistance, and that deployment was authorized on the basis that…
The Preparedness Framework risk classification establishes the internal governance threshold at which OpenAI authorized GPT-4o's release, and the document's acknowledgment of a 'medium' rating in CBR…
This provision creates a pass-through compliance obligation for API operators, meaning that violations by end users of operator-built products can constitute a policy breach by the operator themselve…
This provision caps the types of damages users can recover from OpenAI in a dispute, which is particularly significant given the mandatory arbitration clause that already limits the forum for such cl…
This provision establishes OpenAI's security obligations while defining the scope of liability protection through a qualified security commitment. The disclaimer regarding inherent limitations of dig…
Liability limitation clauses define the maximum financial exposure a company accepts for service failures or harms; under EU law, mandatory consumer protection provisions may override contractual lia…
This provision defines the scope of OpenAI's security obligations by establishing a 'commercially reasonable' standard rather than an absolute security guarantee. The acknowledgment that Internet and…
The terms disclaim all warranties on AI-generated outputs and service availability, which places reliance risk entirely on users and is particularly significant for users who use AI outputs in profes…
This provision limits OpenRouter's financial exposure for a broad range of loss categories including lost profits, data loss, and consequential damages arising from service interruptions or third-par…
This provision establishes OpenSea's affirmative security obligations while establishing a baseline limitation on liability exposure by acknowledging technological constraints inherent to information…
This provision establishes the operational and legal boundary of OpenSea's role as a technology intermediary rather than a custodian or counterparty, which affects the remedies available to users in …
If Paramount+ experiences a data breach that exposes your personal or financial information, or if the service fails in a way that causes you harm, this clause limits the company's financial liabilit…
This provision establishes the operational scope of PayPal's seller protection coverage by defining transaction categories that fall outside the program's protection. The exclusions establish conditi…
This provision operationalizes the distinction between account termination and obligation discharge. It establishes that the contractual relationship's financial obligations survive the administrativ…
The clause defines the operational scope of PayPal's Purchase Protection coverage by carving out specific transaction types—QR code payments and in-person collection scenarios—that fall outside the p…
The Seller Protection exclusions are materially significant for merchants: transactions involving digital goods, services, and custom items are explicitly excluded, meaning sellers in those categorie…
The clause establishes PayPal's authority to direct the logistics and destination of returned merchandise in SNAD disputes and allocates return shipping costs to the claiming party as a procedural re…
This clause creates a continuing obligation structure where account closure operates as a termination of service access but not as a release from financial or contractual liabilities. It establishes …
This clause establishes the operational framework for account cessation, clarifying that termination rights exist independently of liability resolution. The provision ensures PayPal's ability to purs…
This cap means that even if Peacock's service failures cause you real financial harm or significant inconvenience, the maximum compensation you could receive through arbitration is limited to a small…
This disclaimer defines the scope and limitations of Peloton's service offerings from an operational standpoint. It establishes that users are responsible for obtaining independent medical consultati…
If Peloton's service failures or data handling causes significant harm, this clause limits the financial compensation you can pursue to only your recent subscription payments, regardless of the actua…
Because Perplexity is an AI-powered answer engine that users may rely on for research, medical, legal, or financial information, the complete disclaimer of warranties on accuracy and reliability is o…
This provision significantly limits the financial recourse available to developers who suffer business losses due to API failures, outages, or data incidents, even if those losses are substantially l…
Because Perplexity AI provides AI-generated answers to factual questions, the absence of any accuracy warranty means that users who rely on AI outputs for consequential decisions have no contractual …
This provision discloses the inherent limitations of AI-generated outputs and establishes that users bear responsibility for verifying information obtained through the platform. The disclaimer has op…
Liability caps in processor agreements affect how much financial recovery is available to a business customer if Perplexity AI's data processing causes harm, such as a security breach or unauthorized…
This provision defines the maximum financial exposure Perplexity accepts under the agreement, which is operationally significant for enterprise customers assessing the adequacy of contractual recours…
This provision caps the categories of recoverable damages in claims against Perplexity, which is standard in technology service agreements. The clause includes a 'to the maximum extent permitted by l…
If Perplexity AI's service causes you significant harm, such as through inaccurate AI outputs that lead to financial or reputational damage, the maximum you could recover under these terms is very sm…
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Perplexity's liability that is calibrated to historical API spend, which may be substantially lower than the business losses a developer could incur …
This provision asserts that users bear full legal responsibility for the accuracy, quality, legality, and appropriateness of all inputs and outputs, which may have significant implications if AI-gene…
This clause means that if Pika's service causes you financial harm, data loss, or other significant damages, you will likely be unable to recover those losses from the company even if Pika was at fau…
This provision asserts Pika's authority to disclose user identity and information to law enforcement in response to requests or court orders, and requires users to indemnify Pika against claims arisi…
This clause limits Pinecone's financial liability for any cause of action to $50 total, regardless of the number of claims, the nature of the harm, or the form of the legal action asserted.
This clause asserts a broad release of all claims arising from site use, extending to personal injuries and property damage, and for California residents, includes an explicit waiver of California Ci…
This warranty disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Pinterest makes no affirmative representations regarding the condition, performance, or legal status of the Service or its content. This a…
The clause structures Pinterest's financial exposure by categorically excluding broad classes of damages and establishing a dollar ceiling for recoverable amounts. This caps the company's total liabi…
This provision caps the maximum financial recovery available to users in any dispute with Pinterest at $100 or 12 months of fees, and excludes liability for indirect or consequential losses such as l…
This provision establishes that Pinterest's ad approval process does not transfer or share legal compliance liability to the platform, and that advertisers retain full responsibility for regulatory c…
Because Plaid mediates access to your financial accounts, service interruptions or errors could prevent you from accessing or connecting financial apps at critical times, and Plaid has disclaimed any…
This disclaimer allocates risk regarding service performance and data accuracy to the user. By disclaiming warranties on financial data accuracy and service reliability, the provision establishes tha…
This provision defines the contractual ceiling on Plaid's financial exposure to consumers in the event of service failures, data incidents, or other harms, and specifies the categories of damages tha…
The agreement limits Quora's financial exposure for harms arising from platform use, which may affect users' practical ability to recover damages in the event of a data breach, service failure, or ha…
If you suffer a financial loss because of fraud by another user, a data breach, or a platform error, this clause significantly limits what you can recover from Poshmark.
For developers and teams relying on Postman for business-critical API development and testing, the complete disclaimer of implied warranties means Postman assumes no responsibility if the service per…
This provision establishes the contractual ceiling on financial recovery available to users in the event of platform failure, API unavailability, or data loss, which is operationally significant for …
This warranty disclaimer allocates responsibility for service performance to the user. By disclaiming implied warranties, the provision establishes that RapidAPI makes no assurances regarding the ser…
The clause allocates responsibility for information accuracy to the user, establishing that Redfin's liability does not extend to damages arising from incomplete or outdated user-provided data. This …
Liability limitations restrict the financial recovery available to users who suffer harm connected to Redfin's services; the specific terms of the limitation are distributed across the full agreement…
The clause establishes the entity's security standard as 'reasonable measures' rather than absolute security, and allocates responsibility for information security risk to the user by acknowledging i…
The clause allocates responsibility for third-party marketplace models to their respective providers rather than to Replicate, establishing that Replicate's liability excludes all aspects of third-pa…
The warranty disclaimer establishes that Replit makes no guarantees about service performance, reliability, or suitability for specific uses. The liability cap creates a defined ceiling on monetary e…
This disclaimer establishes that Replit provides no affirmative assurances about service performance, reliability, or security characteristics. It allocates risk to the user by removing warranty-base…
The agreement places full responsibility on users to verify AI-generated output and disclaims Replit's liability for errors, which is particularly relevant for users deploying AI-generated code in pr…
The force majeure and legal compliance carve-outs mean Revolut may not compensate you if your account is restricted or a payment fails due to regulatory requirements, even if you suffer a financial l…
The safeguarding mechanism is the primary consumer protection for Revolut account holders in lieu of FSCS coverage, and the choice of safeguarding counterparty banks and approved assets affects how q…
The clause creates continuity of financial obligation across the account lifecycle, ensuring that termination of the service relationship does not eliminate Revolut's ability to collect outstanding a…
FDIC pass-through insurance for prepaid cards is conditional on specific requirements, including that your account must be identifiable as belonging to you on Lead Bank's records. If those conditions…
The liability cap restricts the range of damages Revolut may be required to pay in breach scenarios to direct losses caused by contractual violations, while excluding entire categories of loss from r…
The disclosure establishes the extent to which customer assets are protected against broker insolvency under federal SIPC requirements. This clarifies the regulatory framework governing account prote…
This limitation means that even if Robinhood's actions or service failures cause significant financial harm beyond the direct loss, the agreement asserts that customers cannot recover those additiona…
This provision limits the categories of damages users may recover from Roblox in connection with platform use or service failures, subject to what applicable law permits. The clause's practical effec…
This provision limits the categories of recoverable damages available to users in the event of a claim against Rumble, excluding consequential and punitive damages regardless of whether Rumble had pr…
This provision delineates Runway's operational role as a connector rather than a contracting party, which defines the scope of the company's legal responsibility for user interactions on the platform…
The Customer Agreements Framework serves as the foundational legal structure that defines service parameters, acceptable use requirements, data handling obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms…
As Salesforce deploys autonomous AI agents in customer workflows, the governance frameworks and contractual terms governing AI behavior, data use, and liability become material for organizations eval…
The indemnification obligation allocates risk by requiring users to assume financial responsibility for legal defense and damages related to their own conduct under the agreement. This establishes a …
This provision excludes all indirect, incidental, special, consequential, and punitive damages arising from website use or unavailability; this means users generally cannot recover damages for losses…
This clause establishes operational constraints on permitted use by restricting activities that would compromise system integrity or availability. The provision supports Shopify's ability to maintain…
This provision allocates responsibility for account security to the account holder rather than to Shopify, establishing the operational boundary between merchant obligations and platform liability. T…
The clause establishes a framework under which Shopify acts as a conduit to third-party services without assuming operational oversight or accountability for those services. This allocation of respon…
This cap means that even if Signal's service fails in a way that causes significant harm, users have very limited financial recourse; the $100 ceiling applies regardless of the actual harm suffered.
Users who rely primarily or exclusively on Signal for voice calls could be unable to reach emergency services in a crisis, creating a real safety risk that the policy appropriately discloses.
The liability limitation operates to restrict the scope of recoverable damages in disputes to direct damages only, with a stated maximum of $100 across all claims. This structure defines the financia…
This provision caps the types of recoverable damages users may seek from Skillshare to direct damages only, excluding consequential, incidental, and punitive damages. The practical scope of this limi…
This clause operates to disclaim all representations regarding the quality, condition, or suitability of the Service and materials. It establishes that Skillshare does not warrant the Service will me…
Organizations bear full contractual responsibility for user conduct within their Slack workspace, including unauthorized actions by employees, which has direct implications for compliance with accept…
This clause significantly caps what Snap owes you if its service causes you harm, meaning if you lose data, suffer reputational damage, or experience other indirect losses, you may have limited abili…
This provision creates a full contractual allocation of compliance risk to the advertiser, meaning Snap's platform review and approval process does not constitute a legal compliance certification and…
This provision limits the categories of recoverable damages users may assert against SoFi in connection with service disruptions, data events, or other platform failures, though the clause is qualifi…
Liability caps and warranty disclaimers limit the remedies available to users if SoFi's services malfunction, if errors occur in banking or investment accounts, or if the platform is unavailable duri…
This provision limits the remedies available to users for service failures, content inaccessibility, or other platform issues. The interaction of the warranty disclaimer with the account suspension a…
The clause allocates risk for service interruptions by carving out Spotify's liability exposure for disruptions attributable to external events or actors outside the service provider's operational co…
If a Square service outage prevents a merchant from processing payments during a busy period, or if a security breach exposes customer payment data, the limitation of liability clause means merchants…
For businesses that depend on Squarespace for revenue-generating e-commerce or critical online presence, a damages cap tied to subscription fees paid (which may be a few hundred dollars per year) cou…
This disclaimer establishes the operational baseline for service availability and performance expectations. By disclaiming warranties of merchantability and fitness for purpose, the provision allocat…
This clause significantly limits the categories of losses users can recover from Stability AI, which may be particularly relevant for businesses that suffer financial harm from service disruptions, d…
The liability cap limits the financial remedies available to users if Stability AI's service causes harm, and the provision placing responsibility for AI output misuse on users is operationally signi…
This disclaimer establishes the baseline warranty framework governing the service relationship. It allocates responsibility for service performance and defects to the user rather than the provider, w…
This provision creates a layered obligation structure in which the entity closest to the end user (the API customer or operator) bears contractual responsibility for policy compliance throughout thei…
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure the service provider assumes under the agreement, allocating risk between the parties by establishing predetermined limits on remedies availab…
The disclaimer establishes that Starbucks assumes no responsibility for the operational quality, security, or reliability of the service. This allocation of risk means users accept responsibility for…
This cap applies even to significant harms and means that regardless of the actual damage you suffer, your financial recovery from Starbucks is tightly constrained; combined with the arbitration clau…
This clause could expose you to liability for unauthorized transactions on your account if you fail to promptly report a security breach, which is particularly significant for an investment and banki…
If Strava's service causes you significant harm, for example through a data breach or safety-related incident, the maximum you could recover in most cases is capped at a very low amount, regardless o…
This disclaimer establishes the operational framework under which Strava delivers services without guaranteeing specific performance characteristics, quality standards, or suitability for particular …
This provision establishes that all customer-facing commercial obligations, including delivery, refunds, disputes, and consumer protection compliance, rest with the user rather than Stripe, which is …
The terms bind Users to card network rules that exist in separate, external documents and that can be modified by the networks at any time, meaning Users' obligations can change without a direct amen…
This provision establishes that the service provider does not guarantee specific performance characteristics, content quality, or legal compliance of third-party content. The disclaimer allocates res…
This provision establishes a specific monetary ceiling on Substack's liability exposure per claim, which for free-tier users would be capped at $100. The exclusion of consequential and indirect damag…
If Substack's actions cause you significant financial harm, such as losing a monetized creator account, this clause limits what you could potentially recover in any successful claim to a very modest …
This broad liability disclaimer, combined with the indemnification clause, means that in most scenarios where you experience harm from using Suno, you cannot recover from the company and may instead …
This provision creates a conditional liability exemption that operates when non-compliance is the proximate cause of loss or damage. It establishes that Suno's liability protections extend specifical…
If Supabase's platform fails and causes your business to lose revenue or customers, this clause limits your ability to recover those losses, even if the failure was caused by Supabase's negligence.
For customers relying on Synthesia for business-critical video production, significant service failures or data incidents may result in damages that far exceed the annual subscription fee, leaving su…
The clause operationally restricts the financial exposure Synthesia assumes under the agreement by defining maximum recoverable damages and categorically excluding entire classes of damages from liab…
This clause means that Tabnine accepts no legal responsibility if AI-generated code suggestions contain bugs, security vulnerabilities, or inaccurate logic that causes problems in a user's software p…
This provision states that the service is provided without any warranty as to quality, fitness, or freedom from infringement, which is relevant for enterprise users who integrate AI-generated code in…
This provision disclaims Target's liability for the accuracy, reliability, or suitability of content and services provided through its platform. The qualification 'to the fullest extent permitted by …
This clause places full financial and legal responsibility for unauthorized account activity on the user rather than the platform, which could result in users being held accountable for fraud or misu…
This provision caps the maximum amount a user can recover from Teachable in any dispute at twelve months of fees paid or $100, whichever is greater, and excludes categories of loss including lost pro…
The provision clarifies the operational scope of Telegram's payment infrastructure and establishes boundaries for dispute resolution authority. By not retaining transaction data, Telegram structures …
If a transaction goes wrong when paying through a Telegram bot, you have no recourse through Telegram itself and must pursue the bot developer or payment provider independently, which may be difficul…
Channel administrators who use the Giveaway feature assume full legal and operational liability for the giveaway, including regulatory compliance and prize delivery, with Telegram contractually exclu…
This clause effectively caps Thomson Reuters' financial exposure for harms arising from website use at zero for the most common categories of loss, which is significant for professional users who may…
This clause means that if you rely on information from the Thomson Reuters website and it turns out to be inaccurate or outdated, you generally cannot hold Thomson Reuters legally responsible for tha…
If something goes wrong, such as a data breach, a fraudulent ticket, or a service outage before a major event, this clause limits the financial remedies you can seek from Ticketmaster, even for signi…
The provision establishes a mechanism for TikTok to control programmatic access to platform data and content by restricting automated data collection methods and requiring prior written authorization…
This indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism that allocates legal defense and damage costs to users for disputes involving their platform conduct, content violations, or infringe…
This disclaimer means users cannot rely on contractual warranty protections if the platform fails to perform as expected, experiences security incidents, or produces inaccurate AI outputs.
This provision disclaims all warranties regarding platform performance, reliability, security, and fitness for specific use cases. Users relying on Together AI's platform for production workloads ope…
This provision caps Together AI's financial exposure to users at a fixed maximum equal to twelve months of prior payments or $100, whichever is greater, and excludes categories of damages including c…
For a company whose core service is providing credit and identity data that consumers rely on for financial decisions, a broad warranty disclaimer limits TransUnion's stated responsibility for the ac…
This provision limits the financial recovery available to customers who experience service failures, data loss, or other harms attributable to Twilio's services, as indirect and consequential damages…
If you lose income, content, or opportunities because of a Twitch outage, policy change, or account error, these terms limit your ability to recover those losses from the company, though applicable l…
If Udemy's platform causes you significant harm, such as loss of business revenue due to a service outage or data loss, this clause limits what you can recover from Udemy in a legal claim.
Because Uniswap does not have custody of your funds, if you lose access to your wallet or assets, Uniswap has no ability or obligation to help you recover them.
This provision allocates all risk and cost associated with third-party service interactions to users, and disclaims Uniswap Labs' liability for third-party service-related losses. Given the integrati…
Without any warranty, users have no contractual assurance that the interface will function as expected, which is particularly significant when using it to execute financial transactions.
This introductory notice frames the agreement's risk allocation structure by explicitly stating that warranty protections and damage recovery mechanisms are restricted. The operational significance l…
Warranty disclaimers and liability limitations are standard in software licenses, but for studios building large commercial products on Unreal Engine, these limitations mean that engine failures or d…
This provision limits the total financial recovery available to users in the event of a dispute with Venmo, excluding categories of harm such as consequential losses that may arise from payment failu…
This provision requires advance written authorization for any security testing activity, which is operationally significant for organizations with security research, compliance testing, or bug bounty…
Consumers and compliance reviewers who only read this page will not encounter the substantive obligations such as arbitration requirements, data sharing permissions, or fee terms that apply to their …
Network management disclosures are required by FCC open internet rules and inform consumers about practices such as data throttling or traffic prioritization that can affect the quality and speed of …
The clause establishes a categorical exclusion of certain damage categories from Verizon's potential liability exposure. This operates as a limitation on the scope of recoverable damages in disputes …
The provision establishes Visa's security obligations while simultaneously disclaiming absolute security guarantees. This operational framework defines the standard of protection Visa commits to (rea…
For most digital-only users, the practical damages cap approaches zero since many users of the website may not have made direct payments to Walgreens through the platform in the prior twelve months, …
For a platform that includes pharmacy information, medication details, and health service tools, a complete disclaimer of implied warranties creates meaningful risk for users who rely on site content…
This disclaimer removes implied warranties that consumers might otherwise rely on under applicable law, including implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose for digita…
This clause establishes that Walmart assumes no obligation to warrant the functionality, accuracy, or suitability of the platform or its contents. The disclaimer operates as a contractual allocation …
The indemnification obligation shifts certain legal and financial responsibility to users for claims arising from their account activity or policy violations. This provision establishes a procedural …
The $100 cap applies regardless of the type or severity of harm, including data loss, service failures, or navigation errors, and covers consequential and indirect losses such as business interruptio…
This disclaimer allocates risk by specifying that Waze makes no contractual assurances regarding service performance, reliability, or fitness for specific uses. The provision establishes the baseline…
Users relying on Wealthfront's financial information, projections, or recommendations have no contractual warranty that the information is accurate or current, which is particularly significant in an…
This disclaimer establishes the baseline service conditions and allocates responsibility for service performance and suitability. By operating under this provision, users engage with the platform wit…
The disclaimer establishes the operational scope of Webull's service delivery by excluding advisory functions and positioning investment suitability determinations as a user responsibility rather tha…
This disclaimer establishes the informational character of the platform's content and allocates responsibility for professional advice-seeking to the user. The provision clarifies the operational sco…
Users who rely on market data, analyst ratings, or other content on Webull's platform for investment decisions should understand that Webull expressly disclaims responsibility for investment outcomes…
This disclaimer establishes the baseline warranty obligations under the agreement by eliminating promises about service quality, availability, or security. The provision defines the extent to which W…
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on W&B's liability tied to trailing 12-month fees, which for organizations paying monthly or on lower-tier plans may represent a materially limited reco…
This clause limits the categories of recoverable damages users may seek from Whatnot arising from platform use, including data loss and loss of profits relevant to sellers. The clause is conditioned …
This provision caps the maximum financial recovery available to individual users against WhatsApp at $20 for users who do not pay for the service, which is standard in consumer technology terms but m…
The disclaimer establishes that Whoop provides the Service without guarantees regarding performance, security, availability, or fitness for particular purposes. This provision allocates risk to the u…
This provision caps the categories of damages recoverable from WHOOP in any dispute; users who experience harm from data loss, service interruption, or health data mishandling may be limited to direc…
This provision allocates security risk between the entity and users by acknowledging technical limitations of data protection while establishing user responsibility for transmission security. It defi…
Liability limitations establish the scope of financial exposure the service provider accepts for service failures or defects. This provision narrows the range of compensable harms to direct damages, …
This provision caps Wise's financial exposure for any individual claim, which is particularly relevant for users who experience transaction failures, unauthorized transfers, or incorrect conversions …
This clause limits your ability to recover losses beyond the transaction amount even if Wise's error caused broader financial harm, though US law may provide additional protections for certain electr…
The absence of FDIC insurance means that funds held in your Wise balance carry a different risk profile than funds in a traditional bank account, and your recovery in a worst-case scenario would depe…
Combined with the liability cap, this disclaimer means that if the platform fails or underperforms, Wix has disclaimed virtually all responsibility and your financial recourse is capped at $1,000.
For home security cameras and smart locks sold on the premise of safety and security, a blanket disclaimer of all implied warranties, including fitness for a particular purpose, is a significant limi…
This disclaimer establishes the operational framework under which X operates the service without obligation to maintain specific performance standards, availability commitments, or content moderation…
This disclaimer operates to allocate risk of service interruption, unavailability, or defects to the user rather than the service provider. The provision also establishes X's operational authority to…
This provision allocates risk by establishing that X makes no guarantees about service performance, availability, or quality, and that users accept responsibility for evaluating whether the Services …
The terms disclaim all warranties and reserve the right to limit or terminate service availability to specific users or features at any time, which means users have no contractual guarantee of contin…
If a Microsoft service failure, account error, or data loss causes you significant harm, this clause limits your ability to recover full compensation from Microsoft, though applicable law in your cou…
Liability limitations cap the damages users can recover from Yelp for platform failures, content issues, or service disruptions, which affects the practical value of any legal claim against Yelp.
For most users who do not receive revenue from YouTube, this cap means that even if YouTube causes significant harm such as data loss, account termination, or content removal, the maximum compensatio…
This disclaimer means that consumers who rely on Zillow's property valuations, listing information, or other data for significant financial decisions like home purchases have no contractual recourse …
This disclaimer allocates responsibility for service defects and content accuracy to the user rather than Zillow. It establishes that Zillow assumes no obligation to maintain service uptime, correct …
The agreement excludes Zoom from liability for indirect, incidental, and consequential damages, which includes data loss and service unavailability, substantially limiting the remedies available to u…
The payment agent structure affects how disputes, refunds, and chargebacks are handled, and may affect consumers' understanding of who is legally responsible for fulfilling the transaction.
This provision establishes that eBay's maximum liability is limited and that consequential or punitive damages are excluded to the extent permitted by law. The phrase 'to the extent permitted by law'…
Sellers bear full legal responsibility for their listings' compliance with eBay policies and applicable law, and eBay's right to act includes account-level consequences even when eBay makes its deter…
This clause means that if eBay's platform fails, you lose data, or a service disruption causes you financial harm, your ability to recover those losses from eBay through legal action is significantly…
This disclaimer allocates investment risk to the user and defines the scope of Acorns' performance obligations as limited to service provision rather than outcome guarantees. The provision establishe…
The clause establishes a procedural commitment regarding the scope of automated decision systems Anthropic operates. It limits the operational use of fully automated profiling systems to contexts whe…
Downloading a third-party app from the App Store means you enter into a separate agreement with that developer, whose data practices and terms may be very different from Apple's, and Apple is not lia…
If Apple's services fail, lose your data, or cause financial harm beyond the direct cost of a transaction, the agreement attempts to prevent you from recovering those broader losses from Apple, which…
Registered investment adviser status means Betterment LLC owes clients a fiduciary duty, which legally requires it to act in clients' best interests and make full disclosure of conflicts of interest.
Disclosures that fees were paid for logo use and that some reviewers were compensated are material to evaluating the independence and reliability of the award representations made on Betterment's web…
This disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Canva makes no affirmative assurances regarding service performance, reliability, or security. The provision structures the agreement such that use…
The provision allocates liability for third-party content by establishing that Databricks' role is limited to providing link placement, while third-party site operators bear responsibility for their …
Users who follow links from Databricks websites to third-party sites should independently review those sites' terms and privacy policies, as Databricks assumes no responsibility for third-party pract…
Users cannot rely on any implied assurance that the website content is accurate, up to date, or suitable for their specific needs, which is particularly relevant for users who base business decisions…
The terms disclaim any responsibility for third-party linked content, meaning users who follow links from Datadog's site and encounter harmful or inaccurate content have no recourse against Datadog u…
This provision limits Datadog's contractual exposure for site unavailability, inaccurate content, or security incidents affecting website visitors, placing risk of reliance on site content or availab…
This provision establishes that Datadog accepts no responsibility for the content, accuracy, or practices of third-party sites linked from its website, including sponsored content. Users should be aw…
The security disclaimer is standard boilerplate but is notable in the context of Duo Security, which is itself an authentication and security product, meaning users may have elevated expectations of …
If the service goes down, contains errors, or fails to meet your learning needs, you generally cannot hold Duolingo responsible for any resulting harm under this clause.
This disclaimer means that if the service does not perform as expected or causes problems for your applications, Fly.io has no contractual obligation to compensate you beyond what is covered by any s…
If you follow a link from ford.com to a third-party site and that site collects your data or causes harm, Ford asserts no responsibility for what happens there.
The warranty disclaimer means GitHub assumes no contractual obligation to maintain uptime, accuracy, or security of the service, which is a standard but operationally significant clause for users and…
This clause establishes the baseline warranty structure by limiting Google's affirmative commitments to only those explicitly stated elsewhere in the agreement. It operates to exclude implied warrant…
This standard describes the evaluative framework Google states it applies when deciding whether to develop or deploy AI capabilities, which has implications for how AI-powered products affecting cons…
This provision describes Google's stated approach to pre-deployment safety testing, which is relevant for consumers and organizations who rely on Google AI products in contexts where errors or uninte…
This clause operationalizes a decision-making framework for AI development by establishing social benefit as a primary assessment criterion, though the clause does not specify enforcement mechanisms,…
Developers building production applications on the Gemini API accept that Google makes no commitments about reliability, availability, or fitness for purpose. This is a standard clause but has operat…
This provision establishes the operational scope of the service's accuracy guarantees and allocates verification responsibility to users. By framing outputs as potentially unreliable for professional…
This provision discloses limitations on the reliability of Gemini outputs and establishes that users bear responsibility for verifying information generated by the service. The disclaimer also reinfo…
This provision clarifies the contractual boundaries and liability allocations between Google and third-party financial institutions. It establishes that disputes or issues arising from payment method…
Users who follow links from groq.com to third-party sites should understand that Groq has disclaimed all responsibility for those destinations, including their safety or accuracy.
If the Grubhub platform fails, provides incorrect information about restaurants or delivery, or experiences outages, the company has disclaimed responsibility for those service failures.
This disclaimer is notable because Headspace simultaneously delivers actual therapy and psychiatry through affiliated providers while disclaiming that its content should not substitute for profession…
Carbon emissions disclosure in model cards engages emerging ESG reporting frameworks and provides organizations integrating AI models with data relevant to their own sustainability reporting obligati…
The clause clarifies the pricing structure by distinguishing between the stated fees and tax obligations, establishing that the user bears the administrative and financial responsibility for tax comp…
This provision allocates responsibility for data handling and privacy compliance between Instacart and external entities. It establishes boundaries for Instacart's accountability by distinguishing be…
This provision limits the categories of damages recoverable by users against Amazon, excluding consequential and punitive damages for service disruption or content access failures. The clause include…
This clause means Amazon could reduce the cloud storage available for your Kindle library at any time, potentially requiring you to manage or delete content to stay within new limits.
The repository serves as a centralized reference for the complete set of legal obligations and authorizations that structure Klarna's service delivery. This documentation mechanism facilitates transp…
Liability limitations reduce your ability to recover damages from McDonald's if something goes wrong with their digital services, such as incorrect orders placed through the app or data errors.
This means if Medium's platform malfunctions, loses your content, or fails to perform as expected, you generally have no warranty claim against Medium for those failures.
This principle is relevant to consumers and organizations relying on Microsoft AI systems in safety-critical contexts, as it describes the standard of reliability Microsoft states it aspires to in sy…
These governance structures define the internal oversight mechanisms Microsoft states it has in place for AI accountability, which is relevant to assessing whether adequate human oversight exists ove…
This provision establishes the institutional mechanism through which Microsoft coordinates responsible AI implementation across its operations. The structure designates specific organizational units …
The provision articulates Microsoft's stated framework for responsible AI governance, establishing the institutional values that inform the company's approach to AI system design, testing, and operat…
This provision establishes Microsoft's operational commitment to documented AI governance practices and public disclosure of those standards. The framework's designation as a living document indicate…
Enterprise customers in regulated industries such as healthcare, financial services, and government need to verify that Azure holds the relevant compliance certifications (such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, F…
The proprietary nature of the platform means customers depend on Neon's continued operation, pricing decisions, and feature availability, with limited recourse if the platform changes in ways that af…
Clicking links on Nintendo.com may take you to third-party sites with their own data practices and terms of service that Nintendo has no control over or responsibility for.
This clause means Nintendo accepts no legal responsibility if its services are unavailable, contain errors, or fail to meet your expectations, which limits your ability to seek compensation for servi…
Business and paid customers relying on Notion for critical workflows should understand what service availability Notion contractually commits to and what remedies, such as service credits, are availa…
This means if you rely on information or tools on Okta's website and they turn out to be inaccurate or unavailable, Okta has disclaimed any legal obligation to compensate you.
This commitment describes how OpenAI allocates internal resources toward long-term safety research for AI systems that do not yet exist; it signals the organization's assessment of risk timelines and…
The mission statement frames OpenAI's stated corporate purpose and the lens through which it describes its safety and development decisions; it is a values assertion rather than a legally binding com…
The document discloses the governance process used to authorize GPT-4o's release, including the reliance on external red teaming and an internal framework rather than independent third-party audit, w…
If you travel internationally or use a VPN for privacy reasons, you may find that content you subscribed to access becomes unavailable, and the service may actively prevent you from using privacy too…
This clause establishes full pass-through liability for Subprocessor failures, which aligns with GDPR Article 28(4) requirements and provides business customers with a single point of accountability …
This clause disclaims all express, implied, and statutory warranties for the site, including warranties of merchantability, fitness for purpose, accuracy, and security, and limits any legally require…
This warranty disclaimer allocates responsibility for service performance and content quality between Pinterest and users. By disclaiming warranties, the provision establishes that Pinterest does not…
If Redfin links to a third-party site (such as a lender, title company, or other real estate service provider) and you share information there, Redfin takes no responsibility for how that third party…
The clause operates to limit Redfin's liability exposure for third-party content by establishing that Redfin's endorsement, curation, or responsibility does not extend to external websites accessed t…
The SIPC disclosure informs customers of the scope and limits of account protection, which is material to understanding the actual financial safety net available in the event of broker-dealer insolve…
Organizations in regulated industries or those with procurement requirements for vendor compliance certifications and accessibility compliance can use these resources to evaluate Salesforce's regulat…
The disclaimer explicitly states that Scale does not warrant that the site is accurate, secure, or free of viruses or harmful components, and does not commit to correcting such issues; this is materi…
The inclusion of ESG materials in the legal hub suggests Snowflake treats certain ESG commitments as customer-relevant disclosures, which may be relevant to enterprise procurement processes with ESG …
This disclaimer means that if the app malfunctions and causes you to miss a reward, lose stored card value, or fail to complete a transaction, Starbucks has disclaimed any warranty obligation related…
Users who follow links from the Thomson Reuters website to third-party sites cannot hold Thomson Reuters responsible for any harm, inaccurate information, or privacy practices they encounter on those…
The warranty disclaimer establishes the baseline terms under which Threads operates, specifying that the company does not warrant particular performance standards, error-free service, or continuous a…
This provision establishes that Uber's contractual obligations and liability do not extend to third-party services integrated into or accessible through the platform. Users accessing third-party serv…
Website terms of use typically include disclaimers of liability for content errors, restrictions on automated data collection, and reservations of the right to modify or terminate access, all of whic…
Terms of use for online properties typically include provisions about intellectual property, prohibited conduct, and limitations on liability that apply whenever you visit Verizon's websites or use i…
This disclaimer operates to allocate responsibility for content integrity between Walmart and users. By disclaiming warranties of accuracy and reliability, the provision establishes that Walmart does…
This provision allocates responsibility for third-party content to the operators of those external sites rather than to Walmart, establishing a boundary between Walmart's direct operational control a…
This provision establishes a single authoritative text for contract interpretation and dispute resolution, preventing inconsistent obligations from arising through translated versions and clarifying …
Creators who rely on YouTube for content distribution or income have no contractual guarantee that their content will remain accessible or that the platform will function as expected, which is a mean…
This clause delineates the scope of Zelle's privacy policy governance. By clarifying that third-party websites operate under their own privacy frameworks, the provision establishes that Zelle disclai…
A comprehensive warranty disclaimer means that if the platform is inaccurate, unavailable, or fails to connect you with legitimate employers or candidates, the company has limited contractual obligat…
Create a free account and watch the platforms that matter to you. We'll email you the moment something changes.
A liability limitation clause is a provision in a platform's terms of service or privacy policy governing liability limitation-related rights, obligations, or restrictions.
ConductAtlas tracks 252 platforms with liability limitation clauses - roughly 73% of platforms in the archive. 383 are classified as high severity.
Severity reflects the magnitude of rights waived, availability of opt-out, breadth of users affected, financial or legal exposure created, and the degree of discretion retained by the platform.