Found in 225 of 343 platforms tracked (66% adoption) · 867 provisions
This indemnification obligation means the reader bears financial responsibility for any losses AI21 Labs and its affiliates incur as a result of the reader's breach, including legal fees and judgment…
AWS assumes both the defense burden and the financial obligation for third-party IP claims directed at its Services, shielding customers and their personnel from those costs.
Customers bear full indemnification responsibility for third-party claims arising from their own or their End Users' use of the Services, which can expose customers to substantial financial liability.
This clause places the legal defense burden on AWS Bedrock rather than the customer when third-party IP claims arise from AI-generated output, which is a meaningful protection given the unresolved le…
Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending Acorns and its Affiliates against claims that stem from the user's own breach of these Terms, including intellectual property infringement claim…
The Merchant bears full financial responsibility for Scheme Owner fines triggered by its own non-compliance, meaning Adyen passes those costs entirely to the Merchant.
Influencers bear full financial and legal exposure for all claims arising from their Influencer Pages and Content, with no liability on Amazon's side and a broad indemnification obligation running to…
The clause places the financial burden of defending and satisfying claims on the associate, extending that obligation to a broad set of Amazon-related entities and individuals.
Customers bear broad financial and legal responsibility to protect Amplitude and a wide group of related parties from any and all losses, liabilities, expenses, damages, and costs.
Anyscale's retained liability for agent misconduct under the DPF Principles means individuals have a basis to hold Anyscale accountable even when a third-party agent caused the violation, subject to …
Users give up the right to seek legal redress or damages when Apple Pay makes enforcement decisions that directly affect their access to content or the Services.
Users bear financial responsibility for defending Apple against third-party or other claims that arise from their own use of the Services or breach of the Agreement.
The indemnity obligation falls on the Customer for three distinct categories of claims, including alleged breach, meaning the Customer bears defense costs even if the underlying breach allegation is …
This commitment means the Customer is not left to bear the cost and burden of defending IP infringement claims that arise from Baseten's own products and services.
Users bear financial responsibility for protecting Boston Dynamics and a wide set of related parties against any demands, losses, or claims — placing the cost of defense and liability on the user.
Company bears full liability for user conduct it may not have directly authorized or been aware of, extending accountability beyond the company's own direct actions.
The indemnification obligation covers a broad set of covered parties and an open-ended category of losses, meaning the reader bears financial exposure for claims brought against Brex and its partners.
Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending Bumble and a wide range of affiliated entities against third-party claims, which could result in significant personal liability.
Calendly's acceptance of liability for agent misconduct under the Principles means individuals retain a recourse pathway against Calendly even when the violation is committed by a downstream agent.
Users bear the legal and financial burden of defending Calendly in litigation brought by third parties if that litigation stems from the user's conduct or data.
This indemnity shifts financial exposure for Vault Data theft or misuse entirely onto the Company, even though the data is stored with Checkout.com.
This defense obligation provides users with legal protection against qualifying IP infringement claims, but it is limited to authorized use of Paid Services and to US and EU patents and registered co…
Designating this indemnification as the sole and exclusive remedy forecloses any other legal avenue the customer might otherwise pursue in connection with Output copyright infringement.
The indemnification is broad, covering losses that arise not only directly but also indirectly from Customer Data, and places the financial burden of such claims on the customer.
This indemnification shifts the financial and legal burden of third-party IP infringement claims arising from the Services themselves from the customer to Cohere.
Customers bear financial responsibility for defending and compensating Comcast and every Released Entity against any claim arising from the customer's use of the Services or equipment, which can incl…
This clause assigns Copy.ai accountability for downstream third-party mishandling of personal data under the Data Privacy Framework, not just its own processing.
The indemnification obligation covers attorneys' fees and all losses, meaning users bear financial responsibility for defending CL Entities against third-party claims tied to the user's conduct on CL.
Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending Databricks and a broad set of affiliated persons from any actual or threatened third-party claims, which can arise even before a claim is formal…
Users bear financial and legal responsibility for defending and compensating Datadog and a broad set of affiliated parties against claims and losses, with no monetary cap stated in this clause.
The customer assumes direct financial and legal responsibility for third-party IP disputes triggered by their own content or conduct, shielding DeepL from those costs.
The customer cannot limit their exposure by pointing to an Internal User's individual actions; full liability sits with the customer regardless of who within their organization caused the issue.
Users bear financial responsibility for defending Discord and its personnel against third-party or other claims that arise from the user's own conduct or content.
This indemnification obligation means users may bear financial responsibility for legal costs and damages incurred by DoorDash as a result of the user's own actions or content.
Entrants bear the financial and legal burden of shielding DraftKings and its affiliates from a broadly defined range of claims, including personal injury and property damage.
The indemnification obligation is broad — covering all losses and claims from any access or use of the Service — and extends to a wide range of Duolingo-affiliated individuals and entities.
This shifts the financial risk of intellectual property infringement claims arising from customer-provided Content from Egnyte to the customer.
The indemnification obligation requires users to bear the financial cost of defending and compensating ElevenLabs and a broad set of associated individuals against a wide range of claims, with Eleven…
This obligation requires the user to financially protect the Epic Parties from a broad range of legal claims and their associated costs.
The indemnification obligation is triggered by the user's ordinary use of the site or any Product, not only by breach, which broadens the scope of the user's financial exposure.
The release covers the most serious categories of physical harm, including wrongful death, and runs in favor of a broad set of Eufy-affiliated parties.
Organizers bear indemnification responsibility even for events where Eventbrite itself participated by providing services, broadening the scope of organizer liability.
Users bear personal financial exposure for any costs Faire or its corporate family incurs as a result of the user's breach, including legal fees and damages.
This clause is consequential because it obligates the user to personally bear the financial cost of defending FanDuel and its related entities against covered claims, potentially including legal fees.
This clause places the burden of disproving responsibility on Fastly when an agent mishandles data, meaning affected individuals retain a claim against Fastly rather than being left to pursue only th…
This protection shields the Subscriber from the cost and liability of third-party IP claims tied to Fastly's own Services, provided the Subscriber uses them in accordance with the Agreement.
The Subscriber bears the financial and legal burden of defending Fastly against third-party claims tied to the Subscriber's data or non-compliant use of the Services.
Customers bear financial and legal responsibility for third-party claims connected to their content or their non-compliance, and Figma can elect to require the Customer to conduct the defense.
This indemnification obligation places the financial and legal burden on the Customer whenever a third party sues Fly.io based on the Customer's non-compliant use of the Services.
Users bear financial and legal responsibility for defending GOAT against third-party claims that arise from the user's own access or use of the Service.
Users bear potential financial responsibility for defending and compensating GM and its associated entities against a broad range of claims, with no apparent cap on exposure stated in the excerpt.
This clause extends an existing contractual protection—if present—to cover GitHub Copilot use and Suggestions, but only if the user's Agreement already contains such a provision.
Users bear financial and legal exposure for any third-party or government proceedings that result from their unlawful use, shielding Google from those costs.
Full liability retention means that Customers do not lose their contractual protections when Google Ads uses Subprocessors; Google Ads cannot escape liability by delegating to a third party.
The clause extends publisher liability beyond their own direct actions to encompass the conduct of third-party ad networks and affiliates, meaning publishers can be held responsible for others' polic…
This clause shifts the financial and legal burden of third-party litigation arising from the customer's data or AUP violations entirely onto the customer, potentially exposing the customer to signifi…
This clause allocates the risk of IP infringement claims about Google's own Services to Google rather than the customer, protecting customers from third-party IP litigation over technology they did n…
The Customer bears financial and legal responsibility for third-party claims triggered by its own content or by AUP or Agreement violations, including those caused by its End Users.
This provides the Customer with a meaningful protection against intellectual property infringement claims arising from use of Google's own materials, shifting the defense burden and financial exposur…
The indemnification obligation is broad, covering any and all losses with no stated cap, and is triggered by anything arising out of or in any way related to a user's access or use.
The Employer bears financial responsibility for covering Gusto and a wide range of affiliated parties against a broad range of legal and financial exposures.
This clause places the full financial and legal burden of third-party claims about user-supplied content on the customer, not Harvey AI.
This clause assigns to Harvey AI the obligation to defend against IP infringement claims, but only when the Service is used as the Terms and Documentation specify.
This obligation means a user may be financially responsible for Headspace's legal costs and damages if a third party brings a claim connected to the user's specified conduct.
Customers bear the legal and financial burden of claims connected to their own data or to their misuse of the service, protecting Contentsquare from liability in those scenarios.
This clause allocates to Contentsquare the financial and legal burden of third-party IP infringement claims tied to authorized use of its own service.
The indemnification obligation extends beyond Hilton itself to a broad network of affiliated entities and covers every category of financial exposure listed, placing potentially significant financial…
Users bear financial responsibility for legal costs and claims brought against Hims & Hers and third parties that arise from the user's own conduct, including use of the Service.
Because users bear sole responsibility and must indemnify Hinge for all claims connected to their content, Hinge shifts all legal and financial exposure from user-generated content onto the user.
This clause places the financial and legal burden of intellectual property infringement claims about the Subscription Service on HubSpot rather than the customer.
This clause transfers financial exposure for third-party claims rooted in a customer's misuse of the platform directly to the customer, including the cost of legal defense.
Users bear financial exposure for claims brought against Impact and its related parties, potentially including legal costs, arising from user content or conduct.
A user who breaches the Terms bears full financial responsibility for defending Indeed and its associated parties against any and all claims and costs that arise from that breach.
Users who accept Unattended Delivery relinquish, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the ability to bring any claims against Instacart and the named parties arising from that delivery method.
Readers bear financial responsibility for defending Instacart and Retailers and covering their losses arising from the reader's own conduct, which can include legal costs and third-party claims.
The indemnification obligation extends to a broad network of Kajabi-related entities and individuals, meaning users bear financial exposure for third-party claims arising across that entire group.
Users bear the full financial and legal burden of defending Khan Academy against any claim arising from their own violations of the Terms, with no stated cap on that exposure.
The indemnification obligation is broadly worded to cover any and all claims, which means users could bear significant financial exposure for disputes involving Kick and its wide network of affiliate…
The indemnification obligation is broad, covering all losses, damages, liability, costs, and expenses with no stated cap, and extends to a wide range of Klaviyo-affiliated parties.
Klaviyo assumes the financial and legal burden of defending intellectual property infringement claims about its own Services, limiting the customer's exposure to such third-party suits.
This gives the Customer a right to have LangChain bear the burden of defending patent infringement claims tied to authorized platform use, reducing the Customer's legal exposure from using the platfo…
This shifts the cost and burden of defending third-party litigation about Customer Data onto the Customer, provided LangChain's use of that data was authorized.
The indemnification obligation means users bear the financial and legal burden of defending LexisNexis and a wide range of associated parties against claims that arise from the user's own violations …
This obligation means users bear the financial and legal burden of defending Lime's Released Parties against a broad range of claims connected to the user's own use of the services or products.
This obligation places the legal defense burden for IP infringement claims about the Service on Linear rather than on Customer.
This obligation places the legal defense burden and associated costs on Customer, not Linear, for claims related to User Submissions processed under the Agreement.
LinkedIn shifts financial exposure for third-party claims entirely onto the advertiser across a broad range of advertiser-related activities, including attorneys' fees.
This clause establishes a mandatory defense obligation on Loom's part, but it applies only to the extent the claim arises from authorized use, meaning use outside the agreement's authorization may no…
This clause places financial responsibility on the user for a broad set of third-party or regulatory claims connected to their content or conduct, which could expose users to significant liability.
Customer bears the full cost of defending and compensating Marqeta and its associated parties whenever a Claim is traceable to Customer's material breach, creating significant financial exposure.
This provision establishes that accountability for DPF compliance does not automatically end when McDonald's transfers data to vendors, and creates a rebuttable liability standard.
Users bear financial responsibility for defending Medium and associated individuals against a broad range of legal claims, demands, and costs.
The indemnification obligation is broad, covering any and all third-party claims and extending to Mercury's subsidiaries, agents, licensors, managers, and affiliated companies, potentially exposing u…
This obligation means the licensee bears the financial and legal burden of defending Meta against third-party claims that stem from the licensee's own use or distribution of the Llama Materials.
The indemnification obligation covers all damages, losses, and expenses of any kind, which represents a broad financial exposure for the developer whenever a claim relates to their Platform use.
This obligation means the user bears the financial and legal burden of defending Meta against third-party claims that arise from the user's own conduct or content on Meta Products.
Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending MetaMask against claims that arise from the user's own contractual breaches or legal violations.
This obligation shifts the financial burden of third-party litigation costs onto the user for claims connected to their use of the Services.
This indemnification obligation means Customer bears the cost of defending Miro in litigation brought by third parties that stems from the Customer's own content or conduct.
This indemnification provides Customer with a defense against IP infringement suits arising from authorized use, shifting that litigation burden to Miro.
This retained liability means that engaging Subprocessors does not transfer legal accountability away from Mistral AI toward Customer, preserving Customer's ability to hold Mistral AI responsible for…
The Customer assumes financial responsibility for defending Mistral AI against third-party claims that flow from the Customer's own non-compliant conduct.
The Customer has an affirmative right to be defended and compensated by Mistral AI if its use of the products exposes it to third-party intellectual property claims.
Mixpanel bears the defense burden and cost for covered IP infringement claims, which protects the customer from litigation expenses arising from their permitted use of the Application Services.
Users retain a liability claim against Mixpanel—not just the third party—when agents misprocess their data, with the burden on Mixpanel to disprove responsibility.
Customer bears the financial and legal burden of third-party intellectual property claims that are connected to Customer Data, shielding Modal from that exposure.
Modal accepts financial and legal responsibility for third-party IP infringement claims arising from Customer's authorised use of the Service, reducing Customer's IP litigation risk.
Users bear financial responsibility for any claims or liabilities — including threatened ones — that Nintendo incurs as a result of the user's use of the Services.
Users bear financial responsibility for any claims or losses Noom faces that stem from the user's own conduct, content, or legal violations, potentially including Noom's legal costs.
This clause makes creators financially responsible for any loss or damage OnlyFans suffers as a consequence of a false warranty, creating direct personal financial exposure.
This clause shifts financial exposure for certain claims from OpenAI onto business users, meaning business users may bear costs arising from their use of the Services.
This obligation shifts the financial and legal burden of third-party IP infringement claims about the Services from Customer to OpenAI.
This indemnity shifts financial and legal exposure for intellectual property infringement claims arising from Output directly onto OpenAI rather than the API customer.
The exclusion removes indemnity protection in the scenario where the customer had actual or constructive knowledge of infringement, shifting legal exposure back to the customer.
Enterprise customers are indemnified by OpenAI for intellectual property infringement claims arising from Output, reducing their legal and financial exposure from third-party rights holders.
This pass-through liability provision means that delegating processing to Sub-Processors does not reduce OpenAI's accountability to the Customer under the DPA.
Users bear financial responsibility for defending Oscar Health and its affiliates against all claims arising from the user's use or misuse of the Services, including attorneys' fees.
This indemnification obligation means users bear financial responsibility for defending Oura and covering any resulting liability arising from their own use of the Services.
Users bear financial responsibility for any losses, liabilities, and legal costs Patreon incurs that are connected to the Terms or the user's use of the platform, which can be substantial.
Users bear financial responsibility for PayPal's legal costs and third-party claims that result from their breach of the agreement, which can be substantial.
This obligation requires users to bear the financial and legal burden of defending Peloton against third-party or other claims that stem from the user's own conduct or content on the platform.
Customers bear the financial and legal burden of defending Perplexity AI against third-party claims that originate from the customer's own conduct, content, or misconduct.
Customers are shielded from the financial and legal burden of third-party intellectual property infringement claims directed at Perplexity AI's Services or Outputs.
Customers bear financial and legal responsibility for third-party claims that result from how they use the Services, which can include litigation costs.
The indemnification obligation requires users to bear the financial cost—including attorneys' fees—of defending the Company Entities against claims connected to the user's specified conduct, which ca…
This clause shifts financial and legal exposure from Pika and its associated parties to the user for any claims arising from investigative actions, even where those actions affect the user.
This prevents Pinecone from using Subprocessor involvement as a shield against liability, ensuring customers face no gap in accountability regardless of which entity in Pinecone's chain caused the br…
Users bear the financial obligation to defend Pinecone and its personnel against third-party claims, including attorneys' fees and costs, which can be significant.
Users who engage in commercial activity without the required Business Terms agreement bear personal financial exposure for any claims—including litigation costs—brought against Pinterest entities as …
The Client bears full financial responsibility for third-party claims that result from its own legal violations, which can include costly privacy-related litigation.
The defense obligation is scoped to U.S. patents and copyrights and is limited to claims arising from allegations about the Product itself, providing defined but not unlimited IP protection.
The claim establishes that liability for third-party Data Privacy Framework violations rests with PlanetScale by default, shifting the burden to PlanetScale to disprove its own responsibility.
This indemnification obligation shifts financial and legal exposure—including attorneys' fees—from Progressive to the user for two specific categories of conduct.
Users bear financial responsibility for defending Redfin and its personnel against claims and covering all associated costs, including attorneys' fees, that arise from the specified conduct.
The indemnification obligation covers all losses and extends to a broad set of Replicate-affiliated persons, creating significant financial exposure for customers.
A broad indemnification obligation means users bear the financial risk of any legal claims Ring faces that are connected to user content, including Ring's defense costs.
This indemnification obligation means a creator bears the financial and legal burden of defending Rumble and its personnel if any third party raises a claim tied to the creator's Content submission, …
Users bear financial responsibility for defending RunPod and covering any third-party claims that arise from how users use the Service or whether they comply with the Terms.
Users bear financial responsibility for legal costs and losses that Runway incurs as a result of the user's content, conduct, or breach, which could be substantial if third-party claims arise.
A broad indemnification obligation means users bear the cost of defending Scale AI and its associated persons and entities against third-party claims.
Scale AI's liability for third-party conduct is conditioned on two requirements: the service provider's failure and Scale AI's own responsibility for the triggering event, limiting but not eliminatin…
This obligation means merchants bear the financial cost of defending Shopify and a broad range of affiliated parties against any claim or demand arising in connection with the merchant's use of the s…
Commercial property users assume full responsibility for any harm arising from the System, eliminating recourse against SimpliSafe even for serious outcomes such as injury or loss of life.
This clause shifts the financial cost of defending against third-party or internal claims — including legal fees — to the user whenever those claims arise from the user's Terms violation.
Smartsheet's ongoing liability for agent-processed data means users retain a direct line of accountability to Smartsheet even after their data has been passed to a third party.
The customer bears the cost and burden of defending Smartsheet against third-party claims tied to the customer's own content or unlawful conduct, creating direct financial and legal exposure for the …
The customer bears the obligation to defend Snowflake in litigation or other proceedings brought by third parties based on the customer's own data, materials, or offerings, creating a potentially sig…
Users bear financial responsibility for defending SoFi and covering any resulting costs whenever a third-party or other claim arises from the user's own access to or use of the SoFi Site or App.
Customers who satisfy all three stated conditions—signed Order Form, current version, and use of provided filters—are entitled to uncapped indemnification, which removes a ceiling on recoverable amou…
IP indemnification protects customers from financial exposure when third parties assert that Cody or its outputs infringe their intellectual property, provided the conditions in the customer's agreem…
It establishes that Squarespace cannot fully disclaim liability for its agents' DPF violations; the burden of disproving responsibility falls on Squarespace.
Users bear full financial responsibility for all costs and losses Squarespace or its affiliates suffer as a result of the user's breach of the Agreement, with no stated cap on the amounts covered.
This clause places the burden on Starbucks to prove non-responsibility when an agent violates DPF Principles, giving affected individuals a direct liability pathway against Starbucks rather than only…
Users bear financial responsibility for third-party claims against Stash that stem from their own improper use, and Stash retains the option—not the user—to decide whether the user must also conduct …
The indemnification obligation requires users to bear the financial cost of defending and satisfying claims brought against Substack and its associated parties, including consequential damages—the sa…
This indemnification shifts the financial and legal burden of third-party IP infringement claims about the services from the customer to Supabase.
Customers bear the financial and legal burden of defending T-Mobile against third-party claims connected to their use of T-Mobile's Services, Products, or Devices or their breach of the Agreement.
Clients bear financial and legal responsibility for Liabilities TaskRabbit or its Affiliates incur as a result of the Client's Platform use, which can be a significant financial exposure.
Taskers bear financial and legal responsibility for Liabilities TaskRabbit or its Affiliates incur as a result of the Tasker's Platform use, which can represent significant financial exposure.
This provision shifts financial and legal risk for Platform-related claims from TikTok to the user, potentially exposing users to significant costs from third-party or first-party claims.
The indemnification obligation means users may bear the financial cost of defending Tinder and its personnel against third-party claims arising from the user's conduct.
The dollar cap defines the maximum financial exposure Together AI accepts under its indemnification obligation, regardless of the magnitude of the underlying claim.
Customers receive a defense obligation from Together AI for a defined category of intellectual property claims arising from their permitted use of the Services.
Twilio's retained liability for third-party DPF violations means individuals have a direct claim against Twilio even when the violation is committed by a downstream third party, subject to Twilio's a…
The indemnification covers attorneys' fees and extends beyond Uber to its affiliates and their personnel, meaning a user's use of the Services can expose them to broad financial liability for third-p…
This obligation requires users to actively defend and financially protect Uniswap and an extensive group of associated parties, which can expose users to significant cost and legal responsibility.
Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending UnitedHealthcare and related parties against third-party claims caused by the user's breach, including attorneys' fees for counsel UnitedHealthc…
This obligation requires the user to bear potentially significant legal and financial costs on behalf of Epic when covered claims arise.
The indemnification obligation means a user who breaches the agreement may be financially liable not only for damages but also for PayPal's legal costs in defending against third-party claims.
Users bear financial responsibility for legal costs and claims Vercel faces as a result of the user's breach or content-related infringement claims, which can expose users to significant costs.
The indemnification obligation covers all losses, expenses, damages, fees, fines, and costs with no stated cap, and extends protection to Walgreens' officers, directors, employees, affiliates, and li…
The obligation covers all liabilities, claims, damages, costs, and expenses with no stated cap, meaning a user could face substantial financial exposure for misuse or breach.
The indemnification obligation extends beyond Waze itself to include third-party advertisers, broadening the class of parties a user may be required to defend or compensate.
The reader is financially exposed to litigation costs and damages if they use the Products outside permitted scope or breach the Terms.
This commitment provides the reader with a defense against third-party IP infringement claims arising from use of W&B Assets, which limits the reader's exposure to intellectual property litigation co…
The indemnification obligation covers a broad range of triggering events tied to the user's own conduct, meaning the reader bears financial exposure for claims asserted against Whoop that stem from t…
The customer bears the financial and legal burden if a third party claims that Customer Data the customer provided infringes their rights.
Windsurf bears the defense obligation for qualifying IP infringement claims, shielding compliant customers from the cost and burden of such third-party litigation.
Free-tier customers have no indemnification protection from Windsurf for third-party IP infringement claims, meaning they bear that risk themselves.
The indemnification obligation means customers can be held financially responsible for Wise's legal costs and losses whenever a customer's breach of the Agreement or law gives rise to claims against …
This obligation requires users to absorb Workday's legal costs and liability exposure arising from covered claims, shifting financial risk to the user.
Users bear the financial burden of defending Xfinity and the Released Entities against all qualifying claims, which could include attorneys' fees and other costs that substantially exceed the user's …
This clause places the financial burden of defending and resolving third-party legal claims on the user rather than Yelp, potentially exposing users to significant legal costs.
The indemnification obligation means users may be required to bear the financial and legal cost of defending YouTube Ads against third-party claims connected to the user's conduct.
The customer bears the financial and legal burden of any third-party claim directed at Zendesk that is connected to the customer's own data, which can be significant if that data is sensitive or mish…
This obligation means users may bear the cost of defending Zillow and its personnel against third-party claims, shifting litigation and settlement costs to the user.
The indemnification obligation means clients bear the financial and legal cost of any third-party claims connected to their job advertisement content, not ZipRecruiter.
The indemnification obligation covers a broad set of eBay-related parties and expressly includes reasonable legal fees, meaning users may bear eBay's defense costs in third-party disputes.
Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending xAI against third-party claims that arise from the user's own conduct, inputs, or terms violations.
Monitor emails you after the daily check that finds a change to these clauses on a platform you choose.
A indemnification clause is a provision in a platform's terms of service or privacy policy governing indemnification-related rights, obligations, or restrictions.
ConductAtlas tracks 225 platforms with indemnification clauses - roughly 66% of platforms in the archive.