71 Total
Summary
Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

This document is Anthropic's internal policy for deciding when its AI systems are safe enough to keep developing and deploying. It sets specific capability thresholds that trigger safety requirements — including around weapons of mass destruction — and requires Anthropic to document and review risks at each stage. Anthropic also retains the right to pause AI development at any point it judges necessary, even when the policy does not formally require it.

Analysis

The Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) establishes a structured framework of capability thresholds, safeguard requirements, and internal governance obligations that govern how Anthropic develops and deploys its AI systems. The policy defines specific capability thresholds — including for automated R&D, novel chemical and biological weapons production, and CBRN state-program uplift — at which mandatory safeguard and disclosure obligations activate. It imposes affirmative documentation requirements, including Risk Reports quantifying risk across all deployed models and, at the AI R&D-4 threshold, a formal misalignment risk case. Internal governance mechanisms include multi-party authorization for production code access to model weights, a minimum internal disclosure audience of 200 employees for risk reports, LTBT authority over external review of Risk Reports, and a named Noncompliance Reporting and Anti-Retaliation Policy. Anthropic retains authority to pause AI system development in any circumstances it deems appropriate, independent of RSP-mandated thresholds.

What this means for you

As an internal governance document, this policy does not create direct rights or obligations for individual users. It establishes Anthropic's own obligations: to assess and document AI risks across all deployed models, to implement structural safeguards against misuse of dangerous capabilities (particularly CBRN-related), and to subject its risk assessments to both internal disclosure and external review. The existence of a named Noncompliance Reporting and Anti-Retaliation Policy means there is a formal internal channel for reporting RSP violations. Individual users have no direct action specified in this document.

Institutional Analysis
Stay ahead of the changes

Institutional analysis available with Insight

Which mapped governance frameworks each document engages, tied to the specific provisions that engage them.

Clauses withheld

We withheld clauses we had published from this document. Each withholding is recorded in our correction log:

Featured provisions
Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Complete Provision Index

Every distinct legal provision identified in this document. Featured provisions appear above with analysis.

71 provisions
12 featured
15 clause types

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle AI R&D Capability Threshold Clarification and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Related Analysis

Privacy · April 14, 2026
Deleted Claude Conversations Aren't Gone for 30 Days

Anthropic is more transparent than most AI companies about data retention. Here's exactly what happens when you delete your data, and how t…

Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
This version captured October 21, 2026 00:10 UTC
Last successful capture October 21, 2026 00:10 UTC
Date stated by the document August 14, 2026 (as printed in this version)
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000823
Version ID CA-V-007721
SHA-256 (extracted text, extractor v5) 05ff6b7184067f122bdcd924a631d196f72f1815cbedb38f4d69636a6eea8f9a
Archived bytes SHA-256 (anchor) dd8233e51ff02c1a588ee3da0373b98e602884bf7cd35bdfb6e5df480f4b817b
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Archived bytes anchored (verified Oct. 21, 2026)

Explore more governance records

All Anthropic documents