72 Total
30 High severity
38 Medium severity
4 Low severity

Key Facts

What measures can Anthropic take in circumstances it deems appropriate?
Anthropic retains the freedom to take measures such as pausing AI system development in any circumstances it deems appropriate, even if not required by the RSP.
Does Anthropic retain the freedom to pause AI system development?
Anthropic retains the freedom to take measures such as pausing AI system development in any circumstances it deems appropriate, even if not required by the RSP.
What are ASL-3 deployment safeguards designed to prevent?
Anthropic is designing ASL-3 deployment safeguards to prevent misuse of capabilities that could enable severe harm, particularly in relation to CBRN technologies.
Does Anthropic design deployment safeguards to prevent misuse of capabilities that could enable severe harm?
Anthropic is designing ASL-3 deployment safeguards to prevent misuse of capabilities that could enable severe harm, particularly in relation to CBRN technologies.
What policy does Anthropic maintain?
Anthropic maintains an RSP Noncompliance Reporting and Anti-Retaliation Policy.
What does Anthropic revise its threshold for?
Anthropic revises its threshold for automated R&D to better track the threat model of concern.
What new capability threshold did Anthropic add related to CBRN development?
Anthropic added a new capability threshold related to CBRN development, defining capabilities that could substantially uplift the development capabilities of moderately resourced state programs.
What does Anthropic revise its threshold for to better track the threat model of concern?
Anthropic revises its threshold for novel chemical/biological weapons production to better track the threat model of concern.
Are risk reports shared with all regular-clearance Anthropic staff?
Anthropic requires sharing risk reports with at least 200 Anthropic employees, rather than with all regular-clearance Anthropic staff.
What does the LTBT have the power to do regarding Anthropic's selection of external reviewers?
Anthropic's RSP version 3.2 authorizes the LTBT to request external review of Risk Reports and gives the LTBT the power to approve Anthropic's selection of external reviewers.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Anthropic and get the diff the day its terms change.
Summary

This document is Anthropic's internal policy for deciding when its AI systems are safe enough to keep developing and deploying. It sets specific capability thresholds that trigger safety requirements — including around weapons of mass destruction — and requires Anthropic to document and review risks at each stage. Anthropic also retains the right to pause AI development at any point it judges necessary, even when the policy does not formally require it.

Analysis

The Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) establishes a structured framework of capability thresholds, safeguard requirements, and internal governance obligations that govern how Anthropic develops and deploys its AI systems. The policy defines specific capability thresholds — including for automated R&D, novel chemical and biological weapons production, and CBRN state-program uplift — at which mandatory safeguard and disclosure obligations activate. It imposes affirmative documentation requirements, including Risk Reports quantifying risk across all deployed models and, at the AI R&D-4 threshold, a formal misalignment risk case. Internal governance mechanisms include multi-party authorization for production code access to model weights, a minimum internal disclosure audience of 200 employees for risk reports, LTBT authority over external review of Risk Reports, and a named Noncompliance Reporting and Anti-Retaliation Policy. Anthropic retains authority to pause AI system development in any circumstances it deems appropriate, independent of RSP-mandated thresholds.

What this means for you

As an internal governance document, this policy does not create direct rights or obligations for individual users. It establishes Anthropic's own obligations: to assess and document AI risks across all deployed models, to implement structural safeguards against misuse of dangerous capabilities (particularly CBRN-related), and to subject its risk assessments to both internal disclosure and external review. The existence of a named Noncompliance Reporting and Anti-Retaliation Policy means there is a formal internal channel for reporting RSP violations. Individual users have no direct action specified in this document.

Institutional Analysis
Stay ahead of the changes

Institutional analysis available with Insight

Which mapped governance frameworks each document engages, tied to the specific provisions that engage them.

Featured, High severity

Complete Provision Index

Every distinct legal provision identified in this document. Featured provisions appear above with analysis.

72 provisions
12 featured
15 clause types
30 high severity
Acceptable Use Restrictions 1 1 high
Liability Limitation 1 1 high
Stay ahead of the changes

Monitoring

Anthropic has updated this document before. Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Stay ahead of the changes

Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping? Insight includes governance timelines, drift analysis, and full provision tracking.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle AI R&D Capability Threshold Clarification and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

CFAA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
DMCA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
DSA
European Union
View official text ↗
Trump Executive Order on AI Policy Framework
US
View official text ↗

Related Analysis

Privacy · April 14, 2026
Deleted Claude Conversations Aren't Gone for 30 Days

Anthropic is more transparent than most AI companies about data retention. Here's exactly what happens when you delete your data, and how t…

Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured July 11, 2026 13:43 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000823
Version ID CA-V-004730
SHA-256 9ad6c66902eb2b771ccc40a9d0e1c2d4664c197372e6833be51b902e16754d55
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 352+ platforms.

Start monitoring → Compare plans