Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Vercel's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users who suffer significant direct harm may only recover up to the greater of $100 or six months of fees paid, regardless of the actual magnitude of damages.
Interpretive note: The excerpt contains 'COSTS, LOSSES, OF LIABILITIES' which appears to contain a typographical error ('OF' likely intended as 'OR'). The scope of the cap—whether it covers only Vercel's liability or also applies symmetrically—is not entirely clear from the excerpt alone. The aggregation across all claims is an additional independent proposition not stated in the canonical claim.
The updated terms establish that users are legally responsible for configuring autonomous AI features and third-party tools, must monitor their settings and output, and are bound by the autonomous actions those tools take on their behalf. Users also bear the cost of any services those third-party tools consume through the Vercel platform. The terms state that Vercel is not responsible for loss, damage, or liability arising from AI or third-party tool actions. You can manage this responsibility by carefully configuring settings, permissions, and safeguards before enabling AI features or third-party integrations, and by establishing human review processes for AI-generated output.
View change record →Readers can recover no more than the greater of $100 or their last six months of fees paid to Vercel, even for direct damages.
How other platforms handle this
We do not make any promises that these will be available 100% of the time. Our Services may be disrupted during certain periods, including, for example, as a result of scheduled or emergency maintenance.
TINDER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY CONTENT THAT YOU OR ANOTHER USER OR THIRD PARTY POSTS, SENDS, RECEIVES, AND/OR ACTS ON THROUGH OUR SERVICES, NOR DOES TINDER ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE IDENTITY, INTENTIONS...
we do not warrant that Offering descriptions are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Monitoring
Vercel has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"FOR ANY DIRECT DAMAGES, COSTS, LOSSES, OF LIABILITIES IN AMOUNTS THAT, TOGETHER WITH AMOUNTS ASSOCIATED WITH ALL OTHER CLAIMS, EXCEED THE GREATER OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND THE FEES PAID BY YOU TO VERCEL...IN THE 6 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE ACT THAT GAVE RISE TO THE LIABILITY...Excerpt from Vercel's Terms of Service
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
Users who suffer significant direct harm may only recover up to the greater of $100 or six months of fees paid, regardless of the actual magnitude of damages.
Readers can recover no more than the greater of $100 or their last six months of fees paid to Vercel, even for direct damages.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 291 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Vercel.