Track 1 platform and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
This Data Processing Addendum establishes the terms under which Mistral AI processes personal data as a data processor on behalf of business customers using its AI products and APIs. The agreement authorizes Mistral AI to use customer data to train its AI models unless the business customer has configured an opt-out or is using a product category with opt-out as the default setting. The agreement requires business customers to monitor subprocessor changes through the Trust Center and permits Mistral AI to engage new subprocessors subject to a 10-day objection period.
This Data Processing Addendum (DPA), effective March 12, 2026, governs the processing of personal data by Mistral AI on behalf of commercial customers under the main service agreement, establishing Mistral AI as a Processor and the customer as the Controller under GDPR and CCPA frameworks. The agreement states that Mistral AI processes personal data only on documented customer instructions, but separately authorizes Mistral AI to act as Controller for purposes including AI model training (unless the customer opts out or uses a product opted out by default), automated abuse moderation, and aggregated usage analytics. Notably, the DPA permits Mistral AI to terminate the agreement or affected products if a customer objects to a new subprocessor appointment and no resolution is reached within a 10-day objection window, a condition that places practical leverage on the vendor side; additionally, on-site audit rights are constrained by a 90-day advance notice requirement, a joint auditor selection process, and a customer-borne cost structure, which together represent a more restricted audit framework than some enterprise data processing agreements. The DPA explicitly engages GDPR (including SCCs via EU Commission Decision 2021/914 for international data transfers) and CCPA, with French law governing SCC Module 4 disputes for customers in non-adequate third countries. Compliance teams should evaluate the opt-out configuration for AI model training, the subprocessor notification subscription mechanism via the Trust Center, and the 30-day post-termination data deletion timeline against their own data retention and regulatory obligations.
Institutional analysis available with Compliance
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.
Start Compliance free trialMonitoring
Mistral AI has updated this document before.
Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Start Compliance free trialCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Mistral AI as Controller for AI Model Training and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.