Track 1 platform and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
Yelp's Terms of Service establish the legal agreement governing use of Yelp's website, mobile application, and business tools. The agreement requires that disputes between users and Yelp be resolved through binding individual arbitration rather than court litigation, and includes a waiver of class action rights. The agreement grants Yelp a perpetual, royalty-free license to user-generated content including reviews, photos, and check-ins, and authorizes Yelp to remove content or suspend accounts without prior notice.
This document governs user access to and use of Yelp's consumer and business platforms, including websites, mobile applications, events, and communications, forming a legally binding contract with either Yelp Inc. (for US users) or Yelp Ireland Ltd. (for EEA, UK, and Switzerland residents). The agreement states that users grant Yelp a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, sublicensable worldwide license to use, copy, modify, and display user-submitted content, and the terms authorize Yelp to remove content, suspend or terminate accounts at its discretion, and to send commercial communications to users who have provided contact information. The dispute resolution provisions require binding individual arbitration for most claims, include a class action and representative proceeding waiver, and establish a 30-day opt-out window post-account creation, which is broadly consistent with US platform practice but may face enforceability constraints in EEA and UK jurisdictions under applicable consumer protection frameworks; the terms also assert a broad content license that survives account termination. The agreement engages GDPR and UK GDPR for EEA and UK users respectively, the California Consumer Privacy Act for California residents, COPPA with respect to the explicit prohibition on use by those under 13, and FTC Act consumer protection standards; the dual-entity structure (Yelp Inc. versus Yelp Ireland Ltd.) reflects an attempt to allocate regulatory exposure across jurisdictions. Compliance teams should note that the arbitration clause and class action waiver may be unenforceable for EEA and UK users under local mandatory consumer law, and that the perpetual content license assertion warrants evaluation against GDPR data subject rights including erasure.
Institutional analysis available with Professional
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Professional.
Start Professional free trialMonitoring
Yelp has updated this document before.
Watcher includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Professional includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Start Professional free trialCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Class Action and Representative Proceeding Waiver and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.