3 Documents
6 All provisions
1 Changes · 12 mo
Jun 16, 2026 Last change
Objective measurements
Counted directly from the archive for Sourcegraph Cody — documents, captured versions, and detected changes.
3
Documents tracked
7
Versions captured
1
Changes · 12 mo
1
Changes · all-time
123
Days since change
ConductAtlas User-Protection Index
Provisional · scored on 5 of 6
68.5/100
Business tier · provisional until more dimensions are known
How is this scored? →
Baseline 68.5 here · corpus average 31.4 across 191 scored platforms Top quartile Q1 18.4 · median 30.8 · Q3 42.3

Higher = more protective of you, the user/customer — a deliberately user-protective lens, not a universal “good vs bad” score. Computed algorithmically from Sourcegraph Cody’s cited governance stances; no dimension we haven’t confidently read is ever counted against the score. Free, reproducible, and never purchasable.

Business tier · 68.5/100 · provisional · scored on 5 of 6
Arbitration & class action weight 22% not stated
Data sharing & sale weight 20% 45.0
AI training on your data weight 18% 80.0
Content ownership & licence weight 15% 100.0
Liability & warranties weight 10% 0.0
Governance Coverage
Data Usage
20 provisions
Data Sharing
17 provisions
Privacy Rights
13 provisions
Data Collection
12 provisions
Data Retention
8 provisions
Liability Limitation
4 provisions
Account Control
4 provisions
Other
4 provisions
Ai Automated
2 provisions
Intellectual Property
2 provisions
Quick Facts
Arbitration: Not stated
AI Training: Not used to train AI
Data Retention: Not stated
Class Action: Not stated
Key Governance Provisions
5x Annual Fee Cap for Confidentiality Breach

The cap places a ceiling on recoverable damages for confidentiality or data security breaches, which are among the most serious harms a software service can cause.

Zero Retention by Partner LLMs

The Zero Retention commitment means Partner LLMs hold no persistent copy of customer inputs, outputs, or embeddings, limiting the window during which that data could be exposed or misused.

Sourcegraph Commitments May Not Apply for Own LLM

Customers who bring their own LLM relationship may lose the benefit of Sourcegraph Cody's stated data commitments, including those on training and retention, creating a gap in their assumed protectio…

Repository Contents Shared for Embeddings

Enabling the embeddings feature triggers the transfer of repository contents to a third party, which customers may not anticipate and which depends on an administrator's action rather than the end us…

Prohibited Unlawful Use of Cody

The prohibition establishes two independent bases on which a customer's use of Cody can be deemed non-compliant, one legal and one contractual, with consequences governed elsewhere in the agreement.

Document Coverage
Privacypolicy Termsofservice
Last change detected: Jun 16, 2026 Changes (12 months): 1 Documents monitored: 3 Provisions tracked: 6
Compare With Similar Platforms
AI21 Labs Anthropic Anyscale Apple Intelligence Baseten Boston Dynamics Cerebras Cohere

Documents

Cody Enterprise Terms of Use

Medium

Sourcegraph Cody's privacy and usage terms establish that you own your prompts and outputs, and Sourcegraph will not use your code to train AI models. If a third party claims …

Dated February 15, 2024 · Terms of service
6 provisions 1 version captured Version history →

Sourcegraph Privacy Policy

Medium

This document explains how Sourcegraph Cody handles your personal data: it collects metadata about your AI interactions (such as prompt titles and interaction patterns), keeps your data for as long …

Dated June 12, 2026 · Privacy policy
0 provisions 3 versions captured 1 significant change Version history →

Sourcegraph Terms of Service

Terms of service
0 provisions 3 versions captured Version history →

Recent Changes

June 16, 2026 · Sourcegraph Privacy Policy Medium

Sourcegraph substantially restructured its privacy policy to introduce detailed definitions of personal data categories and clarify its role as a Data Controller versus Data Processor. The updated policy now explicitly …

View change record →
📈 Policy Drift Analysis View all changes →

Selected provisions (2 of 6)

Compare Sourcegraph Cody with other platforms →

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Compare with Similar Platforms

AI21 Labs
ai
Anthropic
ai
Anyscale
ai
Apple Intelligence
ai
Baseten
ai
Boston Dynamics
ai
Cerebras
ai
Cohere
ai

Frequently Asked Questions

What Sourcegraph Cody documents does ConductAtlas track?

ConductAtlas tracks 3 Sourcegraph Cody documents including terms of service, privacy policy, and other governance documents. Every document is captured daily with cryptographic verification.

How many policy changes has Sourcegraph Cody made in the past year?

Sourcegraph Cody has made 1 policy changes in the past 12 months across the documents ConductAtlas tracks.

How many provisions has ConductAtlas classified for Sourcegraph Cody?

ConductAtlas has classified 6 provisions across Sourcegraph Cody's tracked documents.

Can I get alerts when Sourcegraph Cody changes their policies?

Yes. Monitor subscribers ($4.99/month) can add Sourcegraph Cody to their watchlist and receive an email alert after the daily check that finds a change to a tracked document. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.