Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Substack's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
By excluding consequential and indirect damages, the clause eliminates the categories of loss that are typically the largest in practice—such as lost profits, lost data, or downstream harm—leaving users without recourse for those losses.
Interpretive note: The excerpt states the starting point of the liability exclusion list but may be part of a longer enumeration; the canonical claim captures the categories explicitly named in the provided excerpt only.
Users cannot recover indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages from Substack, its licensors, or its suppliers, regardless of the legal theory under which a claim is brought.
How other platforms handle this
TINDER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY CONTENT THAT YOU OR ANOTHER USER OR THIRD PARTY POSTS, SENDS, RECEIVES, AND/OR ACTS ON THROUGH OUR SERVICES, NOR DOES TINDER ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE IDENTITY, INTENTIONS...
we do not warrant that Offering descriptions are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.
Please note that these third parties are responsible for their own privacy practices.
Monitoring
Substack has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"under no circumstances and under no legal theory shall Substack, its licensors, or its suppliers be liable to you or to any other person for: Any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages...Excerpt from Substack's Terms of Use
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
By excluding consequential and indirect damages, the clause eliminates the categories of loss that are typically the largest in practice—such as lost profits, lost data, or downstream harm—leaving users without recourse for those losses.
Users cannot recover indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages from Substack, its licensors, or its suppliers, regardless of the legal theory under which a claim is brought.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 292 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Substack.