116 Total
50 High severity
62 Medium severity
4 Low severity

Key Facts

Does a breach of the Twilio Acceptable Use Policy constitute a material breach of the Agreement?
Twilio establishes that a breach of the Twilio Acceptable Use Policy constitutes a material breach of the Agreement.
Does reassigning your account to a third-party reseller excuse your obligations under the Agreement?
Twilio establishes that reassigning your account to a third-party reseller for administration purposes does not excuse your obligations under the Agreement.
What does Twilio cap the aggregate liability of either party at?
Twilio caps the aggregate liability of either party and all its affiliates arising out of or related to the Agreement at the amounts paid or payable for the services giving rise to the liability during the twelve-month period preceding the claim.
What right must you grant Twilio and its affiliates?
Twilio requires you to grant Twilio and its affiliates the right to process Customer Data as necessary to provide the services in a manner consistent with the Agreement and the Twilio Data Protection Addendum.
Must you grant Twilio the right to process Customer Data as necessary to provide the services?
Twilio requires you to grant Twilio and its affiliates the right to process Customer Data as necessary to provide the services in a manner consistent with the Agreement and the Twilio Data Protection Addendum.
Who is responsible for all use of the services and documentation under the customer's account and the Customer Services?
Twilio requires the customer to be solely responsible for all use of the services and documentation under the customer's account and the Customer Services.
What is the customer required to be solely responsible for?
Twilio requires the customer to be solely responsible for all use of the services and documentation under the customer's account and the Customer Services.
What must you represent and warrant regarding notices?
Twilio requires you to represent and warrant that you have provided, and will continue to provide, adequate notices, and that you have obtained, and will continue to obtain, the necessary permissions and consents required to enable Twilio to process all Customer Data.
What must you represent and warrant regarding permissions and consents?
Twilio requires you to represent and warrant that you have provided, and will continue to provide, adequate notices, and that you have obtained, and will continue to obtain, the necessary permissions and consents required to enable Twilio to process all Customer Data.
Under what rules may the parties commence binding arbitration?
Twilio establishes that the parties may commence binding arbitration under JAMS' Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures, with fees and expenses of the JAMS arbitrator shared equally.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Twilio and get the diff the day its terms change.
Summary

This document sets the rules for using Twilio's services: Twilio must deliver the services and meet its SLA, and you are solely responsible for everything that happens under your account. You must ensure you have all necessary permissions and consents before letting Twilio process any customer data. If a serious dispute arises, it goes to binding arbitration rather than court, and neither side can recover lost profits or similar large categories of damages.

Analysis

This Agreement establishes the terms under which Twilio provides services to customers, setting out affirmative obligations on Twilio to deliver services in accordance with applicable Order Forms, SLA commitments, and security terms, while imposing on customers sole responsibility for all account activity and an ongoing warranty to maintain adequate consents and notices for Twilio's processing of Customer Data. Customer Data processing rights are granted to Twilio and its affiliates to the extent necessary to provide the services, bounded by the Agreement and the Data Protection Addendum. Both parties' aggregate liability is capped at fees paid or payable in the twelve months preceding the claim, with a mutual exclusion of lost profits, revenues, goodwill, and all indirect, consequential, and punitive damages. Disputes are subject to binding arbitration under JAMS' Comprehensive Arbitration Rules with equal fee-sharing, and each party warrants compliance with applicable anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, sanctions, export controls, and related international trade laws.

What this means for you

As a Twilio customer, you bear sole responsibility for all use of the services under your account—including actions by your End Users—and you cannot shift that responsibility to a reseller who administers your account. You must obtain and maintain all required consents and notices for Twilio to process Customer Data; failing to do so at any point constitutes a breach of warranty. Your financial recovery in any dispute is limited to the fees you paid or owed in the prior twelve months, and you cannot recover lost profits, lost data, or consequential damages. Disputes are resolved through binding JAMS arbitration, with arbitration costs split equally between the parties.

Institutional Analysis
Stay ahead of the changes

Institutional analysis available with Insight

Which mapped governance frameworks each document engages, tied to the specific provisions that engage them.

7 important changes detected

7 versions captured · Last updated: July 2026

What changed Twilio's Terms of Service were updated to expand the geographic scope of jurisdictions covered by its contractual framework. The updated terms add Albania and Nigeria to the list of countries whose customers fall under specific governing law and dispute resolution provisions. Previously, customers in these countries would have been categorized under the default framework (State of California governing law, San Francisco courts, or San Francisco arbitration). Under the revised language, customers domiciled or registered in Albania or Nigeria now fall under the England and Wales governing law framework, with disputes handled by courts in London or arbitration in London.
Why this matters The updated terms establish England and Wales as the governing law and London as the venue for dispute resolution for customers domiciled or registered in Albania or Nigeria. Previously, these customers would have been subject to California law and San Francisco courts by default. This change means that if a dispute arises, it will be governed by English law and resolved through the English court system or London arbitration, rather than under California law and the California court system.
View full change record →
What changed Twilio removed two references from its Terms of Service navigation and index on July 3, 2026. The document previously listed 'GDPR Customer Data Protection Addendum' and 'Supplier Data Protection Addendum' as separate line items in the legal terms navigation; the updated version consolidates these into single references titled 'Customer Data Protection Addendum' and 'Supplier Data Protection Addendum' without the regulatory prefix. This is a structural reorganization of how data protection documentation is presented in the terms index, with no apparent change to the underlying data protection agreements themselves.
Why this matters This change reflects a reorganization of how Twilio presents its data protection documentation in its legal terms index. The underlying data protection addendums themselves remain available; the change removes the 'GDPR' prefix label from customer and supplier data protection addendum references. This is a structural clarification without material impact on the rights, obligations, or protections users operate under.
View full change record →

May 9, 2026 medium

Twilio updated its Terms of Service on May 9, 2026, making substantial changes to dispute resolution procedures for Mexico-based customers and removing arbitration provisions for Mexico from its general arbitration …

View change record →
May 1, 2026 low

Twilio added a new terms document reference to its table of contents on May 1, 2026. The change adds 'Twilio Messaging Campaign Terms' as a distinct legal agreement governing Twilio's …

View change record →
April 19, 2026 medium

Twilio updated its Terms of Service on April 19, 2026 to expand the geographic scope of service entities, add new Mexico and Brazil-specific entities to the agreement, and clarify how …

View change record →
April 10, 2026 medium

Twilio updated its Terms of Service on April 10, 2026 to reflect new regional entity assignments and clarifications to service definitions. The revised terms now direct customers in Mexico and …

View change record →
March 19, 2026 medium

Twilio modified its Terms of Service on March 19, 2026, removing Brazil from its entity-specific contracting structure while adding Japan as a separate jurisdiction with its own Twilio entity. The …

View change record →
Featured, High severity

Complete Provision Index

Every distinct legal provision identified in this document. Featured provisions appear above with analysis.

116 provisions
12 featured
18 clause types
50 high severity
General Contract Terms 32 5 high
Show all 32 general contract terms provisions
Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries 1 1 high
Stay ahead of the changes

Monitoring

Twilio has updated this document before. Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Stay ahead of the changes

Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping? Insight includes governance timelines, drift analysis, and full provision tracking.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Account Reassignment Does Not Excuse Customer Obligations and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
View official text ↗
CFAA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
View official text ↗
CAN-SPAM
United States Federal
View official text ↗
FAA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
View official text ↗
GDPR
European Union
View official text ↗
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
View official text ↗
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
View official text ↗
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured July 17, 2026 00:42 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000251
Version ID CA-V-004985
SHA-256 cfa225498cbee94320d010a294ed2fc08b56a3f3a74286c3e2b86302874a07d1
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 352+ platforms.

Start monitoring → Compare plans