8 Total
3 High severity
4 Medium severity
1 Low severity
Summary

This is the official license for DeepSeek's V3 AI model, which governs how individuals and organizations can download, use, modify, and distribute the model. The most significant restriction is that any company or platform with more than 100 million monthly active users cannot use this model commercially without getting a separate written agreement directly from DeepSeek; additionally, nobody is permitted to use the model to build a competing general-purpose AI foundation model. If you are a developer or business using DeepSeek-V3, you should check whether your organization exceeds the 100 million MAU threshold and review whether any planned AI development activities could be characterized as building a competing model.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is the DeepSeek-V3 Model License, a custom open-weight model license governing the use, reproduction, distribution, and modification of the DeepSeek-V3 model weights, parameters, and associated materials published by DeepSeek. The agreement states that commercial use is permitted for organizations with fewer than 100 million monthly active users, while entities exceeding that threshold must obtain a separate commercial license from DeepSeek; the terms also authorize licensees to create and distribute derivative works provided they carry the DeepSeek-V3 model name and are governed by this same license. Notably, the license prohibits use of the model to develop competing general-purpose AI models, a restriction that is operationally distinct from permissive open-source licenses such as Apache 2.0 and may create enforcement ambiguity given the difficulty of defining 'competing' or 'similar' AI foundation models. The license is governed by the laws of the People's Republic of China, which creates jurisdictional complexity for licensees in the EU, US, and other territories; the restriction on competing model development may interact with competition law frameworks in the EU and US depending on market context and enforcement posture. Compliance teams at AI companies, research institutions, and commercial deployers should evaluate the MAU threshold, the competing-model prohibition, the derivative-works attribution requirements, and the governing law clause as priority review items.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Professional

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Professional.

Start Professional free trial
High — 3 provisions
Medium — 4 provisions
Low — 1 provision

Monitoring

DeepSeek has updated this document before.

Watcher includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Professional includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Start Professional free trial

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Commercial Use Threshold (100M MAU) and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured May 11, 2026 10:31 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000784
Version ID CA-V-002394
SHA-256 6a09f5368af6476f16689516f6da61539d971504634bb6baf82c795a103d3e07
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans