Track 1 platform and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
This is Perplexity AI's contract for businesses that license its AI search and answer technology for their employees or products. The agreement states that Perplexity can use aggregated, de-identified data from enterprise interactions to improve its AI models, and that the business customer is responsible for ensuring their employees and end users follow the acceptable use policy. Businesses signing this agreement should review the data processing addendum separately, particularly regarding how employee query data is handled, before deploying the service organization-wide.
This document governs the enterprise-tier relationship between Perplexity AI and business customers accessing Perplexity's AI-powered search and answer engine through an enterprise subscription, with the agreement structured as a standard SaaS master services agreement incorporating an order form. The terms authorize Perplexity to process customer data and user inputs to deliver the service, reserve broad rights to modify or discontinue features with notice, and establish that the enterprise customer (not Perplexity) bears responsibility for ensuring end users comply with acceptable use requirements. Several provisions are operationally notable for enterprise contexts: the agreement asserts that AI-generated outputs are provided 'as is' without accuracy warranties, that Perplexity retains the right to use aggregated and de-identified usage data for product improvement, and that the enterprise customer indemnifies Perplexity for claims arising from customer or end-user inputs and deployments. The document engages GDPR and CCPA frameworks through its data processing obligations and customer data definitions, with the precise scope of Perplexity's data processing role (controller vs. processor) requiring evaluation under applicable law given the nature of AI inference processing. Compliance teams at enterprise customers should evaluate the data processing addendum (referenced but not fully reproduced in this rendering), the limitation of liability caps relative to contract value, and the governing law clause selecting California courts, which may create jurisdictional considerations for non-US enterprise customers subject to GDPR or other mandatory local law frameworks.
Institutional analysis available with Professional
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Professional.
Start Professional free trialMonitoring
Perplexity AI has updated this document before.
Watcher includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Professional includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Start Professional free trialCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle AI Output Accuracy Disclaimer and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.