31 Total
Summary
Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

This policy sets the rules for how you can use Groq's AI services. You are responsible for checking that any AI outputs are accurate, complying with all applicable laws yourself, and ensuring human oversight when using the AI for high-stakes decisions. Groq prohibits a wide range of harmful uses—from illegal content to offensive cyber operations—and can investigate and act on any suspected violation.

Analysis

Groq's Acceptable Use Policy establishes the conditions under which customers and their authorized users may access Groq's Cloud Services and AI Model Services. It enumerates categorical prohibitions on content and conduct—including child sexual abuse material, violent extremism, hate speech, offensive cyber operations, and automated lethal functions without human control—and imposes affirmative obligations on users to evaluate AI outputs for accuracy, assess risks in consequential decision-making contexts, and implement human oversight and safeguards. The policy transfers the full burden of legal compliance, including AI-specific regulation, to the Customer, and assigns to the Customer and its authorized users complete downstream responsibility for all decisions, advice, actions, and omissions based on AI outputs. Groq reserves the right to investigate and enforce against any suspected violation.

What this means for you

As a user of Groq's services, you bear full responsibility for verifying the accuracy of AI-generated outputs before acting on them, and for every decision, action, or inaction that results from your use of the services. If you use Groq's AI to inform consequential decisions in areas such as employment, healthcare, finance, legal matters, housing, insurance, or social welfare, you are required to evaluate the risks of your use case and put appropriate human oversight and safeguards in place. You may not attempt to bypass safety mechanisms, exceed published usage limits, or create multiple accounts to work around restrictions—Groq may investigate and enforce against suspected violations without requiring confirmed proof of breach.

Institutional Analysis
Stay ahead of the changes

Institutional analysis available with Insight

Which mapped governance frameworks each document engages, tied to the specific provisions that engage them.

Clauses withheld

We withheld clauses we had published from this document. Each withholding is recorded in our correction log:

Featured provisions
Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Complete Provision Index

Every distinct legal provision identified in this document. Featured provisions appear above with analysis.

31 provisions
12 featured
9 clause types
Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries 1
Disclosure and Transparency Requirements 1

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle AI output accuracy disclaimer and evaluation obligation and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
This version captured October 16, 2026 00:55 UTC
Last successful capture October 21, 2026 00:51 UTC
Date stated by the document October 15, 2025 (as printed in this version)
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000840
Version ID CA-V-007614
SHA-256 (extracted text, extractor v5) c181881e013cff5d3222cb287fb56d6b776ea9a8aa23488ce7e4fb83ca8a9fb8
Archived bytes SHA-256 (anchor) 0c0d1c0b287ecc4383307dea3991e87b8df1a9c5f8933572bbd0e82057953517
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Archived bytes anchored (verified Oct. 16, 2026)

Explore more governance records

All Groq documents