Track 1 platform and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
This document establishes Microsoft's governance framework and internal standards for the design, development, and deployment of artificial intelligence systems across its product portfolio, including Azure AI, Copilot, and Bing. The framework designates the Office of Responsible AI and Aether Advisory Committee to conduct pre-deployment and post-deployment reviews of AI products against standards in fairness, reliability, safety, privacy, and transparency. The document describes organizational procedures and review mechanisms that apply to Microsoft's AI systems across its product line.
This document is Microsoft's AI Governance framework, a published policy instrument governing Microsoft's approach to the development, deployment, and oversight of artificial intelligence systems across its product and service portfolio. The framework states commitments to responsible AI principles including fairness, reliability, safety, privacy, security, inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability, and establishes internal governance structures including a Responsible AI Standard, an Office of Responsible AI, and an Aether Advisory Committee to operationalize these principles. Notably, the document articulates aspirational governance commitments and internal process obligations rather than legally binding user-facing contractual terms, meaning the provisions describe Microsoft's stated internal practices and policies rather than enforceable rights or obligations as between Microsoft and end users or customers. The framework engages regulatory considerations relevant to the EU AI Act, GDPR, the US Executive Order on AI, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and emerging AI-specific legislative and standards frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, though the document does not itself constitute a compliance certification or regulatory filing. Compliance professionals should note that the document's practical enforceability against Microsoft depends on applicable law and regulatory context, and that the governance structures described represent self-imposed obligations whose implementation and audit mechanisms are internal to Microsoft rather than independently verified.
Institutional analysis available with Professional
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Professional.
Start Professional free trialMonitoring
Microsoft has updated this document before.
Watcher includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Professional includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Start Professional free trialCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Data Governance for AI Training and Operation and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.