Track 1 platform and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
This is the legal agreement that governs use of Unreal Engine, Epic Games' 3D game and content creation software. The agreement establishes that while the engine is available without charge for many users, it requires a 5% royalty on gross revenue exceeding $1,000,000 per product for commercial distributions, and it requires per-seat subscription fees for commercial use cases where the engine supports products not distributed to the public. The agreement also prohibits the use of Unreal Engine and MetaHuman assets as training input for artificial intelligence systems.
This document is the Unreal Engine End User License Agreement (EULA) governing Epic Games' grant of rights to use, modify, and distribute Unreal Engine and related Licensed Technology, with legal basis as a contractual license rather than a sale of software. The agreement states that users may use the Licensed Technology privately without fees under certain conditions, but the terms authorize Epic to require either seat subscription fees (for non-royalty commercial use) or royalty payments at 5% of gross revenue exceeding $1,000,000 USD per product for royalty-bearing distributions, and the agreement expressly prohibits using Licensed Technology as training input for Generative AI Programs. The class-action waiver and jury trial waiver provisions are notable in their scope, and the agreement asserts broad audit rights over licensee records including bank statements; the royalty threshold and seat subscription exceptions for indie developers (under $1M annual revenue) and educational institutions are operationally significant carve-outs that narrow the practical burden on smaller users relative to large commercial studios. The agreement engages GDPR, CCPA, and related data protection frameworks through its privacy provisions, and the royalty reporting obligations and audit rights may engage financial compliance considerations; the AI training prohibition interacts with emerging regulatory frameworks around AI and intellectual property, though enforcement context for such prohibitions remains unsettled. Jurisdiction is governed by North Carolina law for US users and Irish law for non-US users, with mandatory venue in those respective courts.
Institutional analysis available with Compliance
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.
Start Compliance free trialMonitoring
Unreal Engine has updated this document before.
Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Start Compliance free trialCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle AI/ML Training Input Prohibition and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.