This analysis describes what Samsung's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
You will cooperate as fully required by the Chegg Parties in the defense of any claim.
Any claim that any user submission made by you has caused damage to a third party
DeepL shall not settle or recognise claims of third parties without Customer's consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
"You are solely responsible for responding to any and all third-party claims that arise in relation to your use of advanced intelligence features...including but not limited to intellectual property infringement or privacy violation claims...Excerpt from Samsung's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “You are solely responsible for responding to any and all third-party claims that arise in relation to your use of advanced intelligence features...including but not limited to intellectual property infringement or privacy violation claims...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 228 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Samsung.