This analysis describes what Stripe's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
The indemnified party must promptly notify the indemnifying party in writing of any Allegation(s) that preceded the Third-Party Legal Proceeding and cooperate reasonably with the indemnifying party to resolve the Allegation(s) and Third-Party Legal Proceeding.
Any indemnified party must promptly notify the indemnifying party in writing of any allegation(s) that preceded the Third-Party Legal Proceeding and cooperate reasonably with the indemnifying party to resolve the allegation(s)...
You will cooperate as fully required by the Chegg Parties in the defense of any claim.
"it must promptly notify the indemnifying party of the applicable Claim and allow the indemnifying party to take exclusive control of its defense and settlement. The indemnified party must cooperate...Excerpt from Stripe's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “it must promptly notify the indemnifying party of the applicable Claim and allow the indemnifying party to take exclusive control of its defense and settlement. The indemnified party must cooperate...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 228 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stripe.