This analysis describes what Marqeta's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
THESE SECTIONS 9(B) AND 9(C) STATE RAMP'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE OBLIGATIONS, AND COMPANY'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES, WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT OR MISAPPROPRIATION OF THIRD-PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
If Customer is enjoined or otherwise prohibited from using any of the CS Service or part thereof based on a Claim covered by Contentsquare’s indemnification obligations under Section 9.1 (By Contentsquare) above, then Contentsquare will, at its sole expense and option, either: (a) obtain for Custome...
this Section 14 states the parties' sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement for any third-party allegations of Intellectual Property Rights infringement covered by this Section 14.
"Marqeta will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Customer...arising out of...Marqeta's infringement of the intellectual property rights of any third party in connection with the Agreement.Excerpt from Marqeta's Terms of Use
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “Marqeta will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Customer...arising out of...Marqeta's infringement of the intellectual property rights of any third party in connection with the Agreement.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Marqeta.