Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Starbucks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
This provision does not include claims resulting from the Released Parties' willful misconduct and/or gross negligence.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, this Section 13 (Indemnification) states the parties' sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement for any third-party allegations of Intellectual Property Rights infringement...
Twilio will have no liability or obligation under this Section 6.1 with respect to any Twilio Indemnifiable Claim arising out of...(c) Services for which there is no charge or Beta Offerings.
Monitoring
Starbucks has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"this indemnification provision shall not apply to any Claims caused by a Starbucks Indemnitee's sole negligence.Excerpt from Starbucks's Terms of Use
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “this indemnification provision shall not apply to any Claims caused by a Starbucks Indemnitee's sole negligence.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 233 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Starbucks.