This analysis describes what Starbucks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Ramp will have sole control and authority to defend the claim, provided (i) Company may participate in the defense and settlement of the claim with counsel of its own choosing at its own expense.
this Section 14 states the parties' sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement for any third-party allegations of Intellectual Property Rights infringement covered by this Section 14.
Customer's failure to use any enhancements, modifications, or updates to the CS Service that have been provided by Contentsquare
"this indemnification provision shall not apply to any Claims caused by a Starbucks Indemnitee's sole negligence.Excerpt from Starbucks's Terms of Use
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “this indemnification provision shall not apply to any Claims caused by a Starbucks Indemnitee's sole negligence.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 225 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Starbucks.