Provision record
Medium · Medium Terms of Service · View original document ↗

User indemnification of Medium Parties

Medium confidence Common · 224 of 343 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

Does Medium require users to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Medium and its officers, directors, agents, partners, and employees?
“You will indemnify, defend and hold harmless Medium, and our officers, directors, agents, partners and employees...from and against any losses, liabilities, claims, demands, damages, expenses or costs...”
Version CA-V-006384, captured Sept. 4, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Medium requires users to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Medium and its officers, directors, agents, partners, and employees from and against any losses, liabilities, claims, demands, damages, expenses, or costs.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Medium and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Users are required to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Medium and its officers, directors, agents, partners, and employees against claims arising from user violations of third-party rights or law, and to pay all associated fees, costs, and attorneys' fees. Medium retains sole control over the defense or settlement of any such third-party claims.

ⓘ

This analysis describes what Medium's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Users bear financial responsibility for defending Medium and associated individuals against a broad range of legal claims, demands, and costs.

⚠

Interpretive note: The excerpt contains an ellipsis indicating omitted language, which may include conditions, triggers, or qualifications governing when the indemnification obligation arises. Confidence is medium because the full scope of the indemnification clause cannot be verified from the excerpt alone.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Under this clause, users are required to pay all costs, including attorneys' fees, associated with defending Medium Parties against third-party claims related to user conduct, and cannot control the defense or settlement strategy for such claims. The agreement qualifies this obligation with 'to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.'

How other platforms handle this

Kling AI

In the event you are required to indemnify us pursuant to this Agreement or any court rulings, you must secure all necessary approvals and consents from regulatory authorities for the remittance of any indemnified amount to us.

Smartsheet

A party's obligations to defend a Claim Against Customer or a Claim Against Smartsheet...are conditioned on the other party: (a) providing timely written notice of the Claim to the defending party

Workday

If required by applicable law, Section 10 (Indemnification) of the Terms does not apply if you are not responsible (with at least slight negligence) for the indemnified event, breach or damage.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You will indemnify, defend and hold harmless Medium, and our officers, directors, agents, partners and employees...from and against any losses, liabilities, claims, demands, damages, expenses or costs...

Excerpt from Medium's Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Broad user indemnification clauses in consumer agreements may be subject to scrutiny under state consumer protection statutes and may be unenforceable to the extent they conflict with consumer protection frameworks.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Provision details

Document information
Document
Medium Terms of Service
Entity
Medium
Date stated by the document
Sept. 1, 2020
As printed in Medium’s text (version CA-V-006384), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 20, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006384, captured Sept. 4, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013963
Document ID
CA-D-000245
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006384)
0fc65ff94a7a60e62dd2910b49c201d4a4fec11167b7b7bfdb9eeb5b1bae3de3
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 04:26 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006384, captured Sept. 4, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Medium
Document: Medium Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-013963
Version: CA-V-006384
Captured: 2026-09-04 00:42:12 UTC
SHA-256: 0fc65ff94a7a60e6…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/medium/medium-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-013963/user-indemnification-of-medium-parties/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Medium's User indemnification of Medium Parties clause do?

Users bear financial responsibility for defending Medium and associated individuals against a broad range of legal claims, demands, and costs.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, users are required to pay all costs, including attorneys' fees, associated with defending Medium Parties against third-party claims related to user conduct, and cannot control the defense or settlement strategy for such claims. The agreement qualifies this obligation with 'to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.'

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Medium?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Medium.