Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Perplexity AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
The indemnified party must tender sole control of the indemnified portion of the Third-Party Legal Proceeding to the indemnifying party, subject to the following: (i) the indemnified party may appoint its own non-controlling counsel, at its own expense...
Any indemnified party must tender sole control of the indemnified portion of the Third-Party Legal Proceeding to the indemnifying party, subject to the following...
Indemnifying Party will have the sole authority to defend or settle a Claim
Monitoring
Perplexity AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"allow the indemnifying party sole control of defense and settlement of the claim, provided that the party seeking indemnification is entitled to participate in its own defense at its sole expense.Excerpt from Perplexity AI's Perplexity Enterprise Terms
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “allow the indemnifying party sole control of defense and settlement of the claim, provided that the party seeking indemnification is entitled to participate in its own defense at its sole expense.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 233 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perplexity AI.