Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Cohere's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
DeepL shall not settle or recognise claims of third parties without Customer's consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
You will cooperate as fully required by the Chegg Parties in the defense of any claim.
The indemnified party must tender sole control of the indemnified portion of the Third-Party Legal Proceeding to the indemnifying party, subject to the following: (i) the indemnified party may appoint its own non-controlling counsel, at its own expense...
Monitoring
Cohere has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"Customer will fully cooperate with Cohere in the defense of any claim defended by Customer pursuant to its indemnification obligations...and will not settle any such claim without the prior written consent of Cohere.Excerpt from Cohere's SaaS Agreement
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “Customer will fully cooperate with Cohere in the defense of any claim defended by Customer pursuant to its indemnification obligations...and will not settle any such claim without the prior written consent of Cohere.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 233 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cohere.