Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Harvey AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause assigns to Harvey AI the obligation to defend against IP infringement claims, but only when the Service is used as the Terms and Documentation specify.
Interpretive note: The excerpt does not include any indemnification obligation (as distinct from defense); only the defense obligation is quoted. Additional conditions or exclusions may exist in the full clause.
You are entitled to a defense from Harvey AI against qualifying third-party IP infringement claims, conditioned on your use of the Service in accordance with the Terms and Documentation.
How other platforms handle this
Customer must provide us with prompt written notice of any Claim Against Customer and allow us the right to assume the exclusive defense and control...
DeepL shall not settle or recognise claims of third parties without Customer's consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, this Section 13 (Indemnification) states the parties' sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement for any third-party allegations of Intellectual Property Rights infringement...
Monitoring
Harvey AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"Harvey will defend You against any claim by a third party alleging that the Service, when used in accordance with these Terms and the Documentation, infringes any intellectual property right of such third party...Excerpt from Harvey AI's Terms of Service
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
This clause assigns to Harvey AI the obligation to defend against IP infringement claims, but only when the Service is used as the Terms and Documentation specify.
You are entitled to a defense from Harvey AI against qualifying third-party IP infringement claims, conditioned on your use of the Service in accordance with the Terms and Documentation.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 233 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Harvey AI.