This analysis describes what Pika's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
To the extent permitted by applicable law, this Section 13 (Indemnification) states the parties' sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement for any third-party allegations of Intellectual Property Rights infringement...
In response to an actual or potential Infringement Claim, Atlassian may, at its option: (a) procure rights for Customer's continued use of the Products, (b) replace or modify the alleged infringing portion...or (c) terminate the affected Subscription Term...
In the event of a third-party claim that the iOS App...infringes such third-party's intellectual property rights, Mistral AI, and not Apple, will be solely responsible for the investigation, defense, settlement, and discharge of any such intellectual property infringement claim...
"In the event of any third-party claim that any of the Mobile Apps or your use of them infringe a third party's intellectual property rights, Pika, not Apple, is solely responsible for investigating, defending, settling, and discharging any such claim.Excerpt from Pika's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “In the event of any third-party claim that any of the Mobile Apps or your use of them infringe a third party's intellectual property rights, Pika, not Apple, is solely responsible for investigating, defending, settling, and discharging any such claim.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 229 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pika.