This analysis describes what Loom's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
This Section 9.1(b) states the indemnifying party's entire liability to the indemnified parties, and the indemnified parties' sole and exclusive rights and remedies, with respect to an IP Claim.
THESE SECTIONS 9(B) AND 9(C) STATE RAMP'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE OBLIGATIONS, AND COMPANY'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES, WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT OR MISAPPROPRIATION OF THIRD-PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
THIS SECTION 9.1 SETS FORTH XAI'S SOLE LIABILITY AND CUSTOMER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIM OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT.
"This Section 15 (Indemnification by Atlassian) sets out Customer's exclusive remedy and Atlassian's entire liability regarding infringement of third-party intellectual property rights.Excerpt from Loom's Atlassian Customer Agreement
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “This Section 15 (Indemnification by Atlassian) sets out Customer's exclusive remedy and Atlassian's entire liability regarding infringement of third-party intellectual property rights.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Loom.