Provision record
Mistral AI · Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum · View original document ↗

Mistral AI remains liable for Subprocessor data protection failures

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 233 of 352 platforms

Key Facts

Does Mistral AI remain liable to Customer if a Subprocessor fails to fulfill its data protection obligations?
Mistral AI remains liable to Customer if a Subprocessor fails to fulfill its data protection obligations with regard to the relevant Processing activities under the DPA.
When does Mistral AI remain liable to Customer?
Mistral AI remains liable to Customer if a Subprocessor fails to fulfill its data protection obligations with regard to the relevant Processing activities under the DPA.
Get alerted the next time Mistral AI changes these terms. Follow Mistral AI →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Mistral AI Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Mistral AI →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

This analysis describes what Mistral AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This retained liability means that engaging Subprocessors does not transfer legal accountability away from Mistral AI toward Customer, preserving Customer's ability to hold Mistral AI responsible for Subprocessor failures.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If a Subprocessor fails its data protection obligations for relevant Processing activities, Customer can hold Mistral AI liable rather than being required to pursue the Subprocessor directly.

How other platforms handle this

Instacart Medium

Any access to or use of the Services or goods through your account by others, including your spouse, dependents, Recipients, and any access by AI Agents you enable or that operate on your behalf...

Walmart Medium

you agree to cooperate with Walmart if and as requested by Walmart in the defense and settlement of such matter.

Lyft Medium

You will not, without Lyft's prior written consent, agree to any settlement on behalf of any Indemnified Party which includes either the obligation to pay any monetary amounts, or any admissions of liability...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Mistral AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Mistral AI → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Mistral AI will remain liable to Customer if such Subprocessor fails to fulfill its data protection obligations with regard to the relevant Processing activities under the DPA.

Excerpt from Mistral AI's Data Processing Addendum

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum
Entity
Mistral AI
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 11, 2026
Last verified
May 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-061950
Document ID
CA-D-00771
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
665fdccf3892a6b79fd3e3a2e1761e63b0656d270450185360d4858313afcd0c
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 11:22 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Mistral AI
Document: Mistral AI Data Processing Addendum
Record ID: CA-P-061950
Captured: 2026-05-11 11:22:45 UTC
SHA-256: 665fdccf3892a6b7…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/mistral-ai/mistral-ai-data-processing-addendum/provision/CA-P-061950/mistral-ai-remains-liable-for-subprocessor-data-protection-failures/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Mistral AI's Mistral AI remains liable for Subprocessor data protection failures clause do?

This retained liability means that engaging Subprocessors does not transfer legal accountability away from Mistral AI toward Customer, preserving Customer's ability to hold Mistral AI responsible for Subprocessor failures.

How does this clause affect you?

If a Subprocessor fails its data protection obligations for relevant Processing activities, Customer can hold Mistral AI liable rather than being required to pursue the Subprocessor directly.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 233 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Mistral AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mistral AI.