Provision record
Baseten · Baseten Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Customer Indemnifies Baseten for Exclusions and Content

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 232 of 352 platforms

Key Facts

Is Customer required to defend Baseten?
Customer is required to defend Baseten at Customer's own expense against suits based on claims arising out of or relating to an Exclusion, the Customer Marks, or Customer's breach or alleged breach of Section 5.2.
At whose expense is Customer required to defend Baseten against suits based on claims arising out of or relating to an Exclusion or the Customer Marks?
Customer is required to defend Baseten at Customer's own expense against suits based on claims arising out of or relating to an Exclusion, the Customer Marks, or Customer's breach or alleged breach of Section 5.2.
Get alerted the next time Baseten changes these terms. Follow Baseten →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Baseten Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Baseten →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

This analysis describes what Baseten's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The indemnity obligation falls on the Customer for three distinct categories of claims, including alleged breach, meaning the Customer bears defense costs even if the underlying breach allegation is unproven.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The reader is obligated to fund Baseten's defense in suits that fall within the three specified categories, including suits based on alleged rather than proven breaches of Section 5.2.

How other platforms handle this

Whatnot Medium

You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold Whatnot harmless from and against any claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising from or related to: (a) your breach of any representation or warranty in these Terms; (b) any claim that yo...

Twilio Medium

Your obligations in Section 6.2 (Indemnification by Customer) of this Agreement will apply to the extent permitted by applicable law, regulation, or procedure.

Synthesia Medium

Customer shall have no liability under (a) to the extent a Claim Against Us arises from Synthesia Content or under (b) to the extent a Claim Against Us arises from our breach of the Contract.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Baseten has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Baseten → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Customer will defend at its expense any suit brought against Baseten...insofar as such suit is based on a claim arising out of or relating to (a) an Exclusion, (b) the Customer Marks, or (c) Customer's breach or alleged breach of Sections 5.2...

Excerpt from Baseten's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Baseten Terms of Service
Entity
Baseten
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-073815
Document ID
CA-D-00813
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
e9d44a36c9ed500a74656ec3e22a7892bc5e72790392b3c71bde1cc0e32cc19a
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 14:23 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Baseten
Document: Baseten Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-073815
Captured: 2026-07-12 14:23:23 UTC
SHA-256: e9d44a36c9ed500a…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/baseten/baseten-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-073815/customer-indemnifies-baseten-for-exclusions-and-content/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Baseten's Customer Indemnifies Baseten for Exclusions and Content clause do?

The indemnity obligation falls on the Customer for three distinct categories of claims, including alleged breach, meaning the Customer bears defense costs even if the underlying breach allegation is unproven.

How does this clause affect you?

The reader is obligated to fund Baseten's defense in suits that fall within the three specified categories, including suits based on alleged rather than proven breaches of Section 5.2.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 232 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Baseten?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Baseten.