Found in 183 of 352 platforms tracked (52% adoption) · 495 provisions
Users who export or re-export Software to embargoed countries are in breach of the Terms, which aligns with U.S. export control law obligations.
Users who access or transfer the Product in violation of export or sanctions laws may be in breach of the agreement and potentially subject to applicable legal consequences under those laws.
The clause imposes a hard eligibility bar based on sanctions status, applying both U.S. federal sanctions lists and comparable country-level sanctions, which conditions continued participation.
Users—not only Anthropic—bear responsibility for ensuring the Services are not accessed by embargoed countries or restricted parties, which could carry legal consequences under U.S. export and sancti…
Users who share access or deploy the Services internationally may violate this prohibition and bear responsibility for compliance with U.S. export and sanctions law.
Users bear a contractual obligation of full compliance with export control and sanctions regimes, which are complex regulatory frameworks with significant legal consequences for violation.
This obligation places the compliance burden for export control and sanctions laws on the user, not on Cohere.
The obligation spans every jurisdiction of operation or use and covers a broad set of regulatory regimes, making the compliance burden extensive and ongoing.
This prohibition conditions access to the platform on compliance with a broad and non-exhaustive set of legal regimes, exposing users to potential account action if their use is deemed non-compliant.
Users bear direct compliance obligations under U.S. export control and trade sanctions regimes, which carry significant legal consequences for violations.
A customer's sanctions status — including a status acquired after the Agreement is signed — is a trigger for immediate termination, with no cure period.
This representation restricts access to DocuSign's Site for individuals and entities connected to U.S. embargoed countries or territories, consistent with U.S. export control and sanctions law.
This clause imposes a specific export and sanctions compliance obligation on users, tying permissible site use to U.S. foreign terrorist organization designations.
Users bear personal compliance responsibility for a multi-jurisdictional set of export and sanctions regimes, any violation of which could expose them to legal liability.
Non-compliance with export controls can carry significant legal consequences, and this clause places the compliance obligation squarely on the Customer.
The prohibition directly binds users to compliance with a broad, multi-jurisdictional set of legal regimes as a condition of using GitHub.
The clause establishes a categorical prohibition on geographic targeting of embargoed countries or territories, with no stated exceptions, meaning advertisers cannot direct campaigns at any such loca…
The clause places dual obligations on advertisers: independent compliance with sanctions and export regulations, and an affirmative agreement not to expose Google to violations of those same regulati…
Gusto can take severe financial and contractual actions—including freezing funds and ending the Agreement without notice—based on its own determination regarding OFAC status.
The prohibition aligns Site use with U.S. and U.N. export control law, and violation could expose users to legal consequences beyond this agreement.
Users in certain countries or in restricted categories may be legally prohibited from accessing the Services, and non-compliance exposes users to legal liability under export control and sanctions re…
Users in the listed jurisdictions or on the Denied Persons List are categorically prohibited from using the Services, regardless of any other eligibility.
This creates a binding legal compliance obligation on the Customer, meaning violation of export or sanctions laws in connection with using the platform is a breach of the Agreement.
By accepting the Agreement, buyers make an active legal certification committing them not to transfer goods to or for use in Russia or Belarus, creating potential legal exposure if violated.
Buyers bear full legal responsibility for import compliance, meaning Ledger assumes no liability if a shipment is blocked, seized, or penalized at the destination.
Buyers are placed under a direct compliance obligation for export control and sanctions law, meaning violations could expose buyers to legal liability independent of Ledger.
This clause places the legal compliance burden for export and import laws entirely on the customer, meaning violations of those laws in connection with product use are the customer's responsibility.
Users based in the listed jurisdictions are ineligible to use the Service as a condition of the Agreement, reflecting legal obligations under sanctions law that Mailchimp enforces through its terms.
Customer is barred from any cross-border deployment of Marqeta's products without satisfying two independent prerequisites—Marqeta's prior written consent and applicable export licenses—limiting inte…
The prohibition covers both direct and indirect benefit, meaning users cannot structure transactions to route benefits to sanctioned parties through intermediaries.
Users in embargoed countries who engage in commercial activities on Meta Products without applicable legal authorization are in breach of Meta's terms, and may also face separate legal liability unde…
Users who cannot truthfully make these representations are not permitted to use the Offerings, and making a false representation could constitute a breach of the agreement.
Users who are located in sanctioned territories or are themselves sanctioned individuals may be blocked from accessing MetaMask's Offerings.
The Customer bears direct legal compliance obligations across multiple jurisdictions, and non-compliance would constitute a Terms violation with corresponding consequences.
Because compliance is framed as a warranty, breach of applicable U.S. export control or sanctions laws could constitute a breach of the Agreement itself, not merely a violation of external law.
Non-compliance with export and sanctions laws can carry severe legal penalties independent of the Agreement; this clause makes such compliance a contractual obligation as well.
By placing sole responsibility on Customer, OpenAI disclaims any shared obligation to monitor or ensure trade-law compliance, leaving Customer to bear all resulting legal risk.
Users connected to U.S.-sanctioned countries are expressly prohibited from using the Platform, which may expose non-compliant users to account action.
Users who are subject to U.S. sanctions are prohibited from using the Service at all, and all users bear an affirmative obligation to comply with U.S. export and re-export restrictions.
This requirement makes users in sanctioned countries or territories categorically ineligible to use Patreon, regardless of any other circumstance.
A representation and warranty creates a contractual commitment; if false, it may constitute a breach of the Terms and expose the user to legal consequences.
This clause bars advertisers subject to or operating in US-sanctioned territories from using Pinterest ads, and the listed territories reflect current service unavailability tied to those sanctions.
This clause restricts access to RunPod's Service based on sanctions and export control rules, and users who fall within these categories are barred from using the Service.
By warranting compliance, both parties accept legal exposure if they breach the warranty, and a breach by the reader could constitute a violation of the agreement.
Advertisers associated with sanctioned countries are categorically excluded from purchasing or targeting ads on Snapchat Ads, reflecting binding U.S. legal obligations.
Users who transact with sanctioned parties through Square's platform are in breach of this prohibition, which may trigger account termination or fund holds.
The prohibition tracks applicable law on cross-border technology transfer and explicitly names encryption software, a category subject to export controls in many jurisdictions.
Any transaction touching the listed jurisdictions—even indirectly—falls outside what Stripe permits, imposing a broad geographic exclusion.
Stripe itself holds the determination authority, and the listed government sanctions lists are presented as examples rather than an exhaustive definition, giving Stripe discretion to designate additi…
The prohibition ties permitted use directly to external sanctions regimes, meaning the scope of what is forbidden can vary based on which sanctions authorities are deemed relevant and what they prohi…
This restriction exposes users to potential violations if they provide Stripe Technology access to persons in High-Risk Jurisdictions, regardless of intent.
The obligation is framed as a representation and warranty, meaning a breach is not merely a policy violation but a false statement that can trigger additional contractual consequences.
This is a warranty by both parties, meaning breach of any of the specified laws also constitutes a breach of the Agreement itself.
Non-compliance with export control laws can carry legal consequences imposed by law, and users—not Walmart—bear the compliance obligation under this clause.
Limiting availability to the United States means users outside the country have no basis to access or rely on the service.
Failure to comply with U.S. export control laws while using W&B Assets constitutes a breach of the Agreement, in addition to any independent legal liability under those laws.
This restriction places legal compliance obligations on users and means that certain uses or transfers of Wyze products and services are prohibited regardless of the user's intent or location.
The clause makes the user contractually responsible for ensuring all access and use by themselves and their End Users complies with export control and sanctions regulations, which carry significant l…
Monitor emails you the same day a platform you choose changes these clauses.
A export controls & sanctions clause is a provision in a platform's terms of service or privacy policy governing export controls & sanctions-related rights, obligations, or restrictions.
ConductAtlas tracks 183 platforms with export controls & sanctions clauses - roughly 52% of platforms in the archive. 466 are classified as high severity.
Severity reflects the magnitude of rights waived, availability of opt-out, breadth of users affected, financial or legal exposure created, and the degree of discretion retained by the platform.