This analysis describes what Snowflake's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
You are not listed on any U.S. Government list of prohibited or restricted parties.
Customer represents, warrants and covenants that (i) Customer is not named on any U.S. government list of persons or entities prohibited from receiving U.S. exports...(ii) Customer is not a national of, or a company registered in, any Prohibited Jurisdiction...
You will immediately (i) discontinue your use of the Services if you become placed on any Restricted Party List by designation or ownership and (ii) remove your End Users' access to the Services if your End Users become placed on any Restricted Party List...
"Customer represents and warrants that it: (a) is not listed on, or majority-owned by any entity listed on, any U.S. government list of prohibited or restricted parties;Excerpt from Snowflake's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Customer represents and warrants that it: (a) is not listed on, or majority-owned by any entity listed on, any U.S. government list of prohibited or restricted parties;”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 181 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snowflake.