Provision record
MetaMask · MetaMask Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Sanctions and restricted party representation

High severity High confidence Explicit document language Common · 182 of 352 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

Must users represent that they are not subject to sanctions or designated on any list of prohibited or restricted parties?
“you represent to us that you are (1) not subject to sanctions or otherwise designated on any list of prohibited or restricted parties...and (2) not located in any country subject to a comprehensive sanctions program”
Version CA-V-006706, captured Sept. 11, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
MetaMask requires users to represent that they are not subject to sanctions or designated on any list of prohibited or restricted parties, and are not located in any country subject to a comprehensive sanctions program.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track MetaMask and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what MetaMask's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Users who cannot truthfully make these representations are not permitted to use the Offerings, and making a false representation could constitute a breach of the agreement.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 1, 2026

The updated terms explicitly state that UK, EU, and EEA consumers retain statutory consumer protection rights that cannot be limited or excluded by the agreement, and that applicable local law prevails in the event of conflict with these terms. This adds clarity to the legal framework but does not change substantive protections for those users. The terms also clarify that mUSD is a third-party digital asset not issued by Consensys, treating it as a third-party service subject to the agreement's limitations on Consensys' responsibility for third-party services.

View change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Users are required to affirmatively represent that they meet these sanctions-related conditions as a term of using the Offerings.

How other platforms handle this

Segment High

Each party represents that it (and in your case, also your Affiliates and End Users) is not on any applicable sanctions or export controls restricted party list, including, without limitation, the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Controls, Specially Designated Nationals List...

Stripe High

We use Personal Data to meet our contractual and legal obligations related to anti-money laundering, Know-Your-Customer ("KYC") laws, anti-terrorism activities...export control, and prohibition of doing business with restricted persons...

Snapchat High

you are not a person who is barred from using the Services under the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom, or any other applicable jurisdiction — including, for example, that you do not appear on the U.S. Treasury Department's list...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
you represent to us that you are (1) not subject to sanctions or otherwise designated on any list of prohibited or restricted parties...and (2) not located in any country subject to a comprehensive sanctions program

Excerpt from MetaMask's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
MetaMask Terms of Use
Entity
MetaMask
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006706, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-035653
Document ID
CA-D-000279
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006706)
9578e21af45744d3f3b92a51892cefc1e8a53eb0aed053201392da2815e8d899
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 07:13 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found verbatim in version CA-V-006706 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: MetaMask
Document: MetaMask Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-035653
Version: CA-V-006706
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:45:02 UTC
SHA-256: 9578e21af45744d3…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/metamask/metamask-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-035653/sanctions-and-restricted-party-representation/
Accessed: Oct. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does MetaMask's Sanctions and restricted party representation clause do?

Users who cannot truthfully make these representations are not permitted to use the Offerings, and making a false representation could constitute a breach of the agreement.

How does this clause affect you?

Users are required to affirmatively represent that they meet these sanctions-related conditions as a term of using the Offerings.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 182 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with MetaMask?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by MetaMask.