9 Total
3 High severity
5 Medium severity
1 Low severity
Summary

Vercel's Acceptable Use Policy sets out rules for what users and developers can and cannot do on Vercel's cloud platform, including its AI features, hosting services, and developer tools. The most significant terms establish that account holders are responsible not only for their own conduct but also for the conduct of end users who access applications built and deployed on Vercel, meaning a policy violation by a visitor to your app could result in your account being suspended or terminated. If you build applications on Vercel, you should review the specific AI use prohibitions and the end-user responsibility clause to confirm your deployment and your users' activities comply with the policy.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is Vercel's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), which governs permitted and prohibited conduct by users of Vercel's platform and services, operating as an incorporated part of Vercel's broader Terms of Service. The agreement states that users are prohibited from using the platform to facilitate a broad range of activities including generating, transmitting, or storing illegal content; conducting unauthorized access or penetration testing without written permission; deploying malware or destructive code; engaging in cryptocurrency mining without consent; sending unsolicited communications; and using AI features to produce deceptive, harmful, or illegal content. The policy reserves to Vercel the right to suspend or terminate accounts for violations, including conduct by end users of customer-deployed applications, which means account holders bear responsibility for how third parties use their deployments. The AUP engages the FTC Act's unfair and deceptive practices framework, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the CAN-SPAM Act, and, depending on the nature of content and users, potentially COPPA, GDPR, and the EU AI Act, with applicability varying by jurisdiction and the specific nature of the customer's deployment. The AI-specific prohibitions, including restrictions on generating content to deceive or manipulate and requirements to disclose AI-generated content where legally mandated, create compliance considerations that intersect with emerging AI governance frameworks in the EU and at the US federal and state levels.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Professional

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Professional.

Start Professional free trial
High — 3 provisions
Medium — 5 provisions
Low — 1 provision

Monitoring

Vercel AI has updated this document before.

Watcher includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Professional includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Start Professional free trial

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Account Suspension and Termination for Violations and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured May 12, 2026 06:31 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000795
Version ID CA-V-002518
SHA-256 f3f2f72ca3a64cf8775353c7c27528711b631204ebe9914aa69b0552142d84a6
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans