DocuSign
· DocuSign Terms and Conditions
For free or low-cost plan users, this cap may be as low as $100 regardless of actual harm caused, including harm from lost or compromised legally binding documents.
Webull
· Webull Customer Agreement
If Webull's platform has an outage, technical error, or data problem that causes you to miss a trade or lose money, the agreement asserts that Webull is not responsible for those lost profits or consequential financial losses.
For merchants whose annual sales volume or business losses from a service disruption or wrongful account termination could far exceed twelve months of platform fees, this clause materially limits the financial remedies available under the agreement.
Meta
· Meta Terms of Service
For users of free Meta services who have paid nothing, the liability cap is effectively $100, regardless of the type or magnitude of harm experienced, though the 'to the extent permitted by law' qualifier means this cap may not apply in all jurisdictions.
Figma
· Figma Terms of Service
Even if Figma causes significant harm — such as loss of your data or business disruption — the agreement caps what you can recover financially, which may be far less than your actual losses. For free-tier users, the cap may be as low as $20.
Stripe
· Stripe Terms of Service
The terms exclude Stripe's liability for indirect and consequential damages, including lost profits and lost business opportunities, which means businesses that suffer revenue losses due to Stripe service failures or account actions may have limited ability to recover those losses through legal claims against Stripe.
Stash
· Stash Terms of Use
The clause restricts the categories and types of damages recoverable in disputes against Stash and its Partner Bank to exclude consequential and indirect damages, thereby limiting the financial exposure of these entities in liability proceedings regardless of the underlying cause of loss.
This liability limitation restricts the categories of damages recoverable against Robinhood in disputes, concentrating potential recovery on direct damages rather than consequential or speculative harms. The provision operates as a contractual allocation of risk between the company and users in the event of service failures or access disruptions.
This liability limitation operates to define the outer boundary of financial exposure for Checkout.com across all potential claims. The cap is measured against recent transaction fees, which creates a variable ceiling based on user activity level during the preceding quarter.
Box
· Box Terms of Service
If Box experiences a data breach, extended outage, or service failure that causes significant business harm, users can only recover a limited amount equal to recent subscription fees, which may be far less than actual damages suffered.
The terms assert that Twilio's maximum financial exposure is limited to twelve months of fees paid, regardless of the actual magnitude of harm suffered by the customer, which may be significantly lower than downstream business losses.
The liability cap creates a defined financial boundary for Wise's exposure in dispute scenarios, establishing that recoverable damages are restricted to either recent payments made or a $25 minimum, whichever is greater. The exclusion of certain damage categories further narrows the scope of compensable losses to direct damages only.
The exclusion operates to narrow the category of recoverable damages in disputes between TransUnion and users by eliminating liability for consequential and punitive damages. This provision establishes the scope of TransUnion's financial obligation in liability scenarios by reference to damage type rather than by reference to a monetary cap.
Auth0
· Auth0 Terms of Service
If Auth0 experiences an outage or security incident that affects a business's users, the limitation of liability clause determines the maximum financial recovery available, which may be significantly lower than actual business losses.
This clause caps Tabnine's financial exposure at a very low amount, meaning users who suffer significant losses from AI-generated code errors or service failures have limited financial recourse against the company under these terms.
Gusto
· Gusto Terms of Service
For businesses that process large payrolls, the actual financial harm from a payroll processing failure could far exceed twelve months of Gusto subscription fees, leaving the employer-customer absorbing most of the loss.
Unity
· Unity Terms of Service
For studios that depend on Unity's platform commercially and pay substantial licensing fees, this cap means that if Unity's service fails and causes significant business damage, the financial recovery available through these terms is severely constrained relative to the actual harm.
Replit
· Replit Terms of Service
The agreement caps Replit's financial exposure at amounts that may be substantially lower than actual losses a user could suffer, including from service outages affecting production applications, data loss, or AI-generated output errors.
Noom
· Noom Terms of Service
This cap limits Noom's financial exposure even in cases of significant harm, including potential misuse or breach of sensitive personal health data, which could have consequences far exceeding the subscription amount paid.
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure Anyscale accepts under the agreement, restricting the types of damages recoverable and establishing a numerical ceiling on liability claims regardless of actual harm incurred.
For businesses holding significant operating funds in Mercury accounts, this cap means that if Mercury makes an error resulting in financial loss, the recoverable amount under this agreement may be a fraction of the actual harm suffered.
Vercel
· Vercel Terms of Service
For businesses running revenue-generating applications on Vercel, a platform outage or data incident could cause losses that vastly exceed 12 months of platform fees, making this cap a significant risk transfer to the customer.
This provision sets a low ceiling on what OpenAI would owe in most legal disputes, including those involving service failures, data handling issues, or other harm; for free-tier users, the cap is $100 regardless of the nature of the harm.
The clause operates to restrict the damages recoverable in any legal proceeding against ZipRecruiter by excluding entire categories of losses—including lost profits, data loss, and goodwill—that might otherwise be available under applicable law. This limitation applies across all potential liability theories and situations enumerated in the clause.
The clause restricts the categories of damages Zillow may be required to pay in the event of service disruption, third-party interference, or data breach, limiting financial exposure to direct damages only rather than consequential or speculative losses. This allocation affects the cost structure of service provision and the scope of remedies available through dispute resolution.
Amazon
· Amazon Conditions of Use
This clause establishes a financial ceiling on Amazon's liability exposure per user claim and excludes entire categories of damages. The cap may be practically low for users who sustained losses exceeding amounts paid to Amazon or who did not make recent payments.
Impact
· Impact Terms and Conditions
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on impact.com's liability that is directly tied to the contractual fee level, which may be substantially lower than the operational losses a client could sustain from a platform failure, data breach, or service disruption affecting an active partnership program. The consequential damages exclusion further limits recovery for downstream business impacts.
If a platform outage, error, or data issue causes you to miss a trade or lose access to your account at a critical moment, this clause limits what you can recover from Public.com even if the failure was their fault.
Plaid
· Plaid Terms of Use
Because Plaid handles sensitive financial data, a breach or system failure could cause significant financial or privacy harm, but this clause limits Plaid's liability to a nominal amount that likely does not reflect the real-world harm a consumer might suffer.
The limitation establishes the financial and categorical scope of recoverable damages in disputes with Groq. By excluding consequential damages and capping total liability at $100, the provision defines the maximum exposure Groq assumes under the agreement and restricts the categories of losses users may recover through dispute resolution.