Stripe · Stripe Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Limitation of Liability

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 265 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Stripe recorded 2 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Stripe Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

If Stripe's services fail or cause problems for your business, Stripe's legal liability is limited, and Stripe is not responsible for indirect losses like lost profits, lost revenue, or lost business opportunities regardless of the circumstances.

This analysis describes what Stripe's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The terms exclude Stripe's liability for indirect and consequential damages, including lost profits and lost business opportunities, which means businesses that suffer revenue losses due to Stripe service failures or account actions may have limited ability to recover those losses through legal claims against Stripe.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of consequential damages exclusions varies by jurisdiction; applicable state law or EU/UK mandatory law may limit the scope of this exclusion in specific contexts.

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
Apr 3, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 912 other provisions on other platforms.

Change history

modified Jul 1, 2026

Removed the specific monetary cap on liability (3-month fees or $500) and added explicit reference to 'business opportunity' as non-recoverable, significantly limiting user recourse.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This provision limits the categories of damages that a business can claim against Stripe in the event of service failures, wrongful account termination, or other issues arising from the agreement, specifically excluding lost profits, lost revenue, and similar indirect losses.

How other platforms handle this

ConvertKit Medium

To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Kit shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting ...

Pinterest Medium

To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Pinterest shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, res...

Hulu Medium

You will remain responsible for any amounts you fail to pay in connection with your subscription, including collection costs, bank overdraft fees, collection agency fees, reasonable attorneys' fees, and arbitration or court costs.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Stripe has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
In no event will Stripe, its affiliates, or their respective directors, officers, employees, agents, or suppliers be liable to you for any indirect, punitive, incidental, special, or consequential damages arising out of or related to this agreement, including loss of profits, loss of revenue, loss of business opportunity, loss of goodwill, and loss of data. The limitations of liability in this section apply regardless of the form of action and regardless of whether the liability is based on warranty, contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability, or any other legal or equitable theory, and even if Stripe has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

— Excerpt from Stripe's Stripe Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Consequential damages exclusions are a standard feature of commercial agreements in the payment processing industry. Their enforceability varies by jurisdiction: certain US states limit the enforceability of consequential damages waivers in specific contexts, and EU consumer protection law may limit such exclusions in agreements with consumers (though the SSA primarily targets business Users). The FTC's unfair practices authority is relevant if liability limitations are applied in ways that are deceptive or that leave businesses without meaningful recourse for Stripe's own misconduct. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The exclusion of indirect damages is standard in commercial payment processing agreements, but the breadth of the exclusion, covering loss of profits, revenue, business opportunity, and goodwill, combined with Stripe's broad account suspension and termination authority, means that businesses harmed by Stripe's account actions may face significant practical barriers to recovery. The exclusion applies 'regardless of the form of action' and even where Stripe has been 'advised of the possibility of such damages.' JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK jurisdictions generally permit consequential damages exclusions in B2B agreements but may impose limits where the exclusion would be unreasonable under applicable law. California courts have in some cases scrutinized broad liability exclusions in commercial contracts. The enforceability of this clause for businesses in jurisdictions with strong mandatory liability frameworks should be evaluated under local law. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Businesses should assess their risk exposure from Stripe service interruptions or account actions against the backdrop of this limitation and consider whether business interruption insurance or contractual risk allocation with downstream partners is appropriate. The limitation applies to Stripe's affiliates and personnel as well as Stripe itself, which is relevant for complex multi-entity transaction structures. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams reviewing the SSA for vendor risk purposes should document the limitation of liability scope and assess whether it is acceptable given the business's revenue dependence on Stripe. Where applicable law may limit the enforceability of the exclusion, legal teams should evaluate whether alternative dispute resolution mechanisms or regulatory complaint channels provide meaningful recourse.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over unfair or deceptive practices in commercial agreements, which may be relevant if liability limitations are applied inconsistently with disclosed terms
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stripe Terms of Service
Entity
Stripe
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 27, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-000757
Document ID
CA-D-00107
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
ba3a7b25a1b43698323b986577624b162c5c51802d1bb82f1a99dff5da4335ef
Analysis generated
April 27, 2026 12:29 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Stripe
Document: Stripe Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-000757
Captured: 2026-04-27 12:29:11 UTC
SHA-256: ba3a7b25a1b43698…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stripe/stripe-terms-of-service/limitation-of-liability/
Accessed: July 4, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stripe's Limitation of Liability clause do?

The terms exclude Stripe's liability for indirect and consequential damages, including lost profits and lost business opportunities, which means businesses that suffer revenue losses due to Stripe service failures or account actions may have limited ability to recover those losses through legal claims against Stripe.

How does this clause affect you?

This provision limits the categories of damages that a business can claim against Stripe in the event of service failures, wrongful account termination, or other issues arising from the agreement, specifically excluding lost profits, lost revenue, and similar indirect losses.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 265 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stripe?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stripe.