The terms cap OpenAI's aggregate liability at the amount paid in the prior 12 months or $100, which means that even paid subscribers have very limited financial recourse against OpenAI for service failures or harmful outputs.
Meta
· Meta Terms of Service
For users of free Meta services who have paid nothing, the liability cap is effectively $100, regardless of the type or magnitude of harm experienced, though the 'to the extent permitted by law' qualifier means this cap may not apply in all jurisdictions.
Amazon
· Amazon Conditions of Use
This clause establishes a financial ceiling on Amazon's liability exposure per user claim and excludes entire categories of damages. The cap may be practically low for users who sustained losses exceeding amounts paid to Amazon or who did not make recent payments.
The limitation establishes the financial and categorical scope of recoverable damages in disputes with Groq. By excluding consequential damages and capping total liability at $100, the provision defines the maximum exposure Groq assumes under the agreement and restricts the categories of losses users may recover through dispute resolution.
Lime
· Lime Terms of Service
If you suffer a loss connected to Lime's service, such as a billing error or a service failure, you may only be able to recover a very limited amount through arbitration, regardless of the actual harm you suffered.
Impact
· Impact Terms and Conditions
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on impact.com's liability that is directly tied to the contractual fee level, which may be substantially lower than the operational losses a client could sustain from a platform failure, data breach, or service disruption affecting an active partnership program. The consequential damages exclusion further limits recovery for downstream business impacts.
Steam
· Steam Subscriber Agreement
The clause operates to restrict the financial exposure Valve assumes under the agreement by categorically excluding certain damage categories and capping aggregate liability at a fixed amount, which affects the remedies available to users in dispute resolution.
This liability cap operates to define the scope of financial exposure Cerebras accepts for service failures or breaches. By excluding entire categories of damages from potential recovery, the provision shapes the economic framework under which disputes are resolved and establishes clear boundaries on the remedies available through the contractual relationship.
This clause limits the types of financial harm users can seek compensation for in a dispute, excluding categories like lost investment profits or losses resulting from platform outages, which are directly relevant to a trading platform.
For businesses whose operations depend heavily on HubSpot, the actual financial impact of a serious service failure or data incident could far exceed twelve months of subscription fees, leaving significant losses unrecoverable under this agreement.
Netflix
· Netflix Account and Content Policies
The clause narrows the categories of damages available in disputes with Netflix by contractually restricting liability exposure to direct damages only, subject to statutory limitations that may override this restriction in certain jurisdictions.
Stash
· Stash Terms of Use
The clause restricts the categories and types of damages recoverable in disputes against Stash and its Partner Bank to exclude consequential and indirect damages, thereby limiting the financial exposure of these entities in liability proceedings regardless of the underlying cause of loss.
This limitation of liability clause establishes the maximum financial exposure Binance.US accepts in user disputes, which determines the scope of available remedies and the cost structure for resolving claims. The exclusion of certain damage categories narrows the range of compensable losses in any proceeding.
This cap means that even if Paramount+ causes you significant harm (such as a data breach exposing personal information), the most you could recover in arbitration is a relatively small dollar amount.
The clause restricts the categories of damages Zillow may be required to pay in the event of service disruption, third-party interference, or data breach, limiting financial exposure to direct damages only rather than consequential or speculative losses. This allocation affects the cost structure of service provision and the scope of remedies available through dispute resolution.
This liability limitation restricts the remedies available to users in disputes with Walmart by excluding entire categories of damages and establishing a monetary ceiling tied to user payments. The provision operates to define the scope of Walmart's financial exposure under the terms of use.
PayPal
· PayPal User Agreement
This limitation of liability clause establishes the maximum financial exposure PayPal assumes under the user agreement. The cap applies uniformly across all dispute scenarios and substantially narrows the range of compensable damages compared to general contract law, thereby defining PayPal's operational risk profile in the relationship.
The clause sets contractual prerequisites for service use by conditioning access on both legal capacity and regulatory compliance, establishing that the agreement is enforceable only where users meet these foundational requirements.
Reddit
· Reddit User Agreement
This provision establishes Reddit's maximum financial exposure in dispute scenarios, which affects the practical remedies available to users and shapes the risk allocation between the platform and its user base. The existence and structure of liability caps influence the incentive structure for platform investment in operational safeguards and dispute resolution.
Hinge
· Hinge Terms of Service
The clause operates as a categorical exclusion from liability for entire classes of damages, meaning Hinge's financial exposure is confined to direct damages only and excludes consequential or intangible loss categories that often represent the largest component of claimed harm in service disruption or data breach scenarios.
The foreseeable loss standard narrows the scope of recoverable damages in breach scenarios by excluding consequential, indirect, or unforeseeable losses. The carve-out for negligence, death, and fraud reflects statutory limitations on contractual liability waivers that apply to gross negligence and intentional wrongdoing.
This provision limits the monetary recovery available to users who experience harm from genetic testing errors, data incidents, or service failures, which may result in recoverable amounts being materially lower than actual harm suffered.
The exclusion operates to narrow the category of recoverable damages in disputes between TransUnion and users by eliminating liability for consequential and punitive damages. This provision establishes the scope of TransUnion's financial obligation in liability scenarios by reference to damage type rather than by reference to a monetary cap.
The clause defines the maximum financial exposure Anyscale accepts under the agreement, restricting the types of damages recoverable and establishing a numerical ceiling on liability claims regardless of actual harm incurred.
This clause restricts the categories of damages recoverable in disputes against Verizon by contractual definition, limiting exposure to direct damages only and excluding broader damage categories even when Verizon's conduct created foreseeable risk.
Fitbit
· Fitbit Terms of Service
The clause narrows the categories of damages recoverable against Fitbit in disputes, limiting exposure to direct damages only and excluding entire classes of losses (consequential, punitive, and intangible losses) regardless of the underlying cause of loss.
Replit
· Replit Terms of Service
The agreement caps Replit's financial exposure at amounts that may be substantially lower than actual losses a user could suffer, including from service outages affecting production applications, data loss, or AI-generated output errors.
This cap means that even if you have spent hundreds or thousands of dollars on in-game purchases and suffer a significant loss due to Riot Games' actions, your maximum recovery under the agreement is capped at a relatively small amount.
The clause operates to restrict the damages recoverable in any legal proceeding against ZipRecruiter by excluding entire categories of losses—including lost profits, data loss, and goodwill—that might otherwise be available under applicable law. This limitation applies across all potential liability theories and situations enumerated in the clause.
AWS
· AWS Customer Agreement
For businesses that rely on AWS for critical infrastructure, this cap may be far smaller than actual losses from a serious outage or data incident, leaving the customer to absorb the majority of the financial damage.