Even if Groq causes you significant harm, the maximum you can recover from them is $100, and you cannot recover for lost profits, data loss, or other indirect damages.
No matter how much harm you suffer from Groq's website — including data loss or security breaches — Groq has capped its financial liability to you at $100, making meaningful compensation effectively unavailable.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Limitation of Liability and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →A $100 liability cap makes it economically irrational to pursue most individual claims against Groq, functioning effectively as near-total insulation from financial liability for website-related harm.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Limitation of liability clauses are evaluated under state unconscionability doctrine (Restatement (Second) of Contracts §208; California Civil Code §1670.5). A $100 cap in a consumer-facing context may be deemed unconscionably low by California courts, particularly where the clause is both procedurally unconscionable (take-it-or-leave-it web terms) and substantively unconscionable (nominal cap). FTC Act Section 5 may be implicated if the cap is combined with misleading representations about safety or security. GDPR Article 82 provides data subjects with rights to compensation for data breaches that cannot be contractually waived.
Compliance intelligence locked
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.