These are legally enforceable rights under California law, meaning Perplexity is legally required to respond to your requests within 45 days — not just a courtesy option.
These rights are backed by California law and enforced by the California Privacy Protection Agency, giving California consumers meaningful legal recourse if Verizon fails to honor these requests.
These CCPA/CPRA rights give California consumers meaningful legal tools to control how Equifax — one of the most data-rich companies about their financial lives — uses and shares their information, and exercising these rights is free of charge.
These rights are legally enforceable under California law, meaning McDonald's must respond to valid requests within 45 days — failure to honor them is an actionable violation enforceable by the California Privacy Protection Agency.
Yelp
· Yelp Privacy Policy
These rights give consumers meaningful control over their personal data and require Yelp to respond to verified requests within statutory timeframes.
Notion
· Notion Privacy Policy
This is one of the strongest privacy rights available to consumers — it allows California residents to directly halt the flow of their personal data to advertising platforms and data brokers.
California's CCPA/CPRA gives residents among the strongest data rights in the US, and this provision confirms those rights apply to MetaMask users — you can exercise them directly with Consensys.
Under California law, sharing data via advertising cookies can legally qualify as 'selling' or 'sharing,' giving California residents a meaningful opt-out right that other users may not have.
The policy distinguishes between selling and sharing personal data under CCPA, acknowledging that advertising cookie sharing may qualify as sharing under CPRA, and provides California residents with a specific opt-out right.
Under the expanded CPRA (which amended CCPA), 'sharing' data for cross-context behavioral advertising — not just selling it — triggers opt-out rights, so the 'no sale' claim may not fully protect California residents if data is shared for advertising analytics.
This provision grants California residents a specific statutory right to stop their data from being shared for behavioral advertising, and Mixpanel acknowledges that its advertising-related data sharing may qualify as 'sharing' under CCPA/CPRA.
Zoom
· Zoom Privacy Statement
California's privacy laws give residents stronger rights than most US states, and Zoom's disclosure that it sells or shares personal information triggers the formal opt-out mechanism required by CCPA and CPRA.
Target
· Target Terms and Conditions
California's CCPA gives residents legally enforceable rights to access, delete, and opt out of the sale of their personal data; Target's platform infrastructure includes CCPA-specific API endpoints suggesting these rights are operationally implemented, but consumers must actively exercise them.
Target
· Target Terms and Conditions
California residents have stronger data rights than users in other states, including the right to see exactly what data Target has collected and to stop Target from selling or sharing that data with third parties for advertising.
California residents have the strongest privacy rights under U.S. law with respect to Datadog's data collection, including the right to opt out of their data being shared with advertising partners.
This is a meaningful consumer protection right — exercising it stops your behavioral data from flowing to advertising platforms that use it to build profiles and target you with ads.
Asana
· Asana Privacy Statement
California residents have broader privacy rights than most US users, including the right to opt out of data sharing that could be classified as a 'sale' under CCPA, which is particularly relevant given Asana's use of third-party analytics and advertising technologies.
This gives California residents meaningful control over their data, though the policy notes that limitations apply and responses depend on Uniswap's ability to identify you with the information you provide.
OpenAI
· OpenAI Privacy Policy
California residents have some of the strongest consumer data rights in the US, and OpenAI is obligated to honor these rights including responding to opt-out requests within legally required timeframes.
23andMe
· 23andMe Privacy Statement
California law provides some of the strongest consumer privacy rights in the US, and 23andMe is required to honor them — including for highly sensitive genetic data.
These are legally enforceable rights under California law, and Craigslist provides a direct web form and email address to exercise them — making it relatively straightforward to access or delete your data.
This acknowledgment confirms that advertising-related data flows may constitute a sale under CCPA, which gives California residents a legally enforceable right to stop that data sharing, and signals the breadth of TaskRabbit's advertising data practices.
This right is only explicitly guaranteed to California residents under CCPA/CPRA — users in other US states do not have an equivalent statutory opt-out right under this policy.
Twilio
· Twilio Privacy Notice
The notice acknowledges that sharing data with advertising partners may qualify as a sale or sharing under CCPA/CPRA, which triggers a legally mandated right for California residents to opt out of this specific data use.
Slack
· Slack Privacy Policy
California residents have a legal right under CCPA/CPRA to stop Slack from sharing their personal data with third parties for advertising or cross-context behavioral targeting purposes.
Deemed acceptance through continued use is a particularly problematic mechanism for privacy policy changes, as it means Inflection AI could expand its data collection or sharing practices with only website-posted notice, and users who don't regularly check the policy may unknowingly agree to more expansive data practices.
Acceptance of updated privacy terms by continued use rather than explicit re-consent means that changes to data practices take effect without requiring your affirmative agreement, which is significant if material changes expand data collection or sharing.
This provision establishes the minimum age as 13, which aligns with COPPA's threshold; however, it does not describe age verification mechanisms, which may affect practical enforcement of this restriction.
Zoom
· Zoom Privacy Statement
This provision establishes Zoom's stated policy on data collection from minors, which is relevant for parents, schools, and organizations that use Zoom in educational contexts. It sets a minimum age threshold of 16, which is higher than the US COPPA threshold of 13.
StockX
· StockX Privacy Policy
While COPPA compliance is addressed for under-13 users, the policy's handling of teen users between 13 and 17 who may be buying or selling on the platform is less clearly specified, which matters given the platform's appeal to younger sneaker and streetwear collectors.