This provision creates a set of AI governance obligations applicable to any customer building or fine-tuning AI models on the Databricks platform, and incorporates by reference a separate AI guidelines document that may be updated independently, creating a dynamic compliance obligation.
This provision establishes a use restriction that defines prohibited conduct within Anthropic's service terms, establishing boundaries on how generated content may be represented or deployed in communications with third parties.
This clause establishes a use restriction that prevents Hulu content and service access from being instrumentalized for AI/ML development purposes. The provision operates as a categorical prohibition rather than a licensing arrangement, meaning Hulu does not authorize derivative use of its content for these computational purposes under any circumstance.
The provision defines the scope of permissible AI/ML training activities and establishes consent as a procedural requirement before such processing can occur. This allocation of decision-making authority regarding model training practices forms a material component of the data processing framework.
This clause establishes a contractual boundary around permissible uses of Netflix's platform and content. It operates as a use restriction that applies to the full lifecycle of machine learning development, not merely deployment, and requires affirmative authorization for any ML-related activity involving Netflix content or services.
Netflix
· Netflix Account and Content Policies
This provision establishes Netflix's operational control over content use for computational purposes, preventing the service from becoming a data source for third-party or user-developed AI systems. The scope covers both direct model training and intermediate stages like prompt engineering and validation, which creates a comprehensive restriction on ML-based content analysis.
The clause establishes a use restriction that protects Hulu's content library from being incorporated into third-party AI model development, which would occur without compensation or licensing arrangement. This aligns with Hulu's content control and intellectual property protections.
Netflix
· Netflix Account and Content Policies
This restriction establishes a boundary on permissible uses of the service by excluding machine learning development workflows. The provision operates as a use-case restriction that applies regardless of whether the ML activity occurs during active streaming, content access, or subsequent processing of obtained content.
The clause establishes a contractual restriction on a specific downstream use of licensed content, preventing integration of game code or materials into AI model training pipelines. This limitation applies regardless of whether the AI system learns from direct input or from prompt-based interactions.
The provision creates a framework for AI system transparency by imposing obligations on developers to communicate technical limitations and ensure users understand the nature and bounds of AI functionality, establishing a design principle rather than a compliance mechanism with enforcement procedures.
This provision limits the technical modalities through which Maps content can be accessed and displayed, constraining customers from extracting or reproducing Maps data through methods other than the approved API pathways and requiring ongoing compliance with interface specifications.
The provision operationalizes Cohere's service delivery model by delineating the boundaries between authorized and unauthorized API usage. This framing establishes the contractual basis for usage monitoring, rate limiting, and enforcement actions if users exceed specified parameters or violate usage restrictions.
Apple
· Apple App Store Review Guidelines
This provision operates as a content gatekeeping mechanism that conditions app availability on Apple's assessment of content compliance. The discretionary framing creates an operational requirement that developers must anticipate rejection criteria without exhaustive specification, affecting app submission and approval workflows.
Amazon
· AWS Acceptable Use Policy
The provision establishes AWS's procedural requirement for users to actively participate in compliance monitoring and violation remediation, creating an operational duty for account holders to facilitate investigation and correction of alleged violations.
This provision prohibits a broad range of automated data collection activities without prior written authorization, covering screen scraping, database scraping, crawlers, robots, and spiders. The prohibition applies to 'any purpose' and 'any means,' establishing a comprehensive restriction on programmatic access to platform data.
This provision establishes that user-configured update preferences may be overridden by Google for updates classified as addressing serious security vulnerabilities, serious usability issues, or misconduct. Under this clause, Google retains unilateral authority to modify installed Content on user devices in circumstances it determines warrant such action.
The provision creates operational requirements around bonus credit lifecycle management, including expiration windows, usage prerequisites, and reclamation mechanisms. These conditions structure how FanDuel administers promotional credits and defines the timeframes within which users must engage with the platform to retain bonus value.
Amazon
· AWS Acceptable Use Policy
This provision defines the scope of authorized service usage and establishes the operational boundaries within which AWS Services may be deployed. Violation of these prohibitions creates grounds for service suspension or termination under the AWS acceptable use framework.
Amazon
· Amazon Conditions of Use
This broad content license grant establishes Amazon's operational rights to exploit user-generated content without ongoing payment obligations or time limitations. The sublicensability provision permits Amazon to extend these rights to third parties, creating downstream usage permissions beyond the direct Amazon-user relationship.
Grindr
· Grindr Privacy Policy
The age restriction establishes eligibility criteria for service access and creates an operational mechanism for community enforcement through user-initiated reporting channels. This reflects the platform's procedural approach to maintaining age-based access controls.
Yelp
· Yelp Privacy Policy
This provision operationalizes Yelp's compliance obligations under children's privacy statutes such as the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). It establishes the procedural requirements Yelp follows when personal information from underage users is identified, including information removal and account termination.
This provision operationalizes compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and similar age-based data protection regulations by establishing a data deletion mechanism upon discovery of under-13 user data. The notification pathway creates a procedural channel for reporting and remediation of inadvertent child data collection.
The clause grants Riot Games enforcement authority over account conduct through defined categorical prohibitions and a residual standard permitting discretionary enforcement against conduct deemed inconsistent with service intent. This operational structure establishes the basis for account restriction or termination actions.
Suno
· Suno Acceptable Use Policy
This provision establishes a licensing distinction between free and paid users that directly affects whether generated output can be commercially exploited. Users operating on the free tier who distribute, sync, or monetize generated music may be operating outside the scope of their licensed permissions under the agreement.
This provision establishes that commercial use of Output is gated behind a specific subscription tier. Users on free-tier plans who use Output commercially without an appropriate subscription may be in breach of the agreement, which could trigger suspension or termination of access.
The provision establishes Glassdoor's operational authority over content moderation while explicitly disclaiming responsibility for user-generated content on the platform. This allocation of discretionary control and liability exemption creates the legal framework governing what content remains accessible and who bears responsibility for its presence.
TikTok
· TikTok Community Guidelines
The provision creates the institutional framework by which TikTok enforces content policies and user conduct standards across the platform. It establishes that guidelines function as binding terms applicable to all users and all content.
Strava
· Strava Privacy Policy
This provision creates operational constraints on how Strava handles health-category data distinct from other activity data. By categorizing certain data streams (heart rate, HRV, sleep information) as health information subject to stricter protocols, the clause establishes a differentiated data handling framework that requires consent-gating and limits monetization pathways for that category of information.
This provision establishes Google's ongoing authority to assess publisher property eligibility and to withdraw monetization access for content or property characteristics that fall outside AdSense program policies. The eligibility criteria are defined and subject to change by Google, creating ongoing compliance monitoring obligations for publishers.
Spotify
· Spotify Terms and Conditions
This provision establishes that content curation and presentation on the Spotify Service may reflect commercial relationships rather than solely algorithmic or editorial factors. The authorization enables Spotify to integrate sponsored or promotional content into the user-accessible catalog as a standard operational practice.