Any dispute...shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the ACICA Arbitration Rules. The seat of arbitration shall be Sydney, Australia. The language of the arbitration shall be English. The number of arbitrators shall be one.
DocuSign
· DocuSign Terms and Conditions
Section 10.7 (Mandatory Arbitration, Waiver of Class Actions) will not apply to you
Kick
· Kick Terms of Service
Unless you are an Australian User, you and Company further agree that any arbitration pursuant to this Section shall not proceed as a class, group or representative action.
if this Section 12.6 is found under the law to be invalid or unenforceable then, in that case, the entire Arbitration Agreement will be void, and the parties agree that all Disputes will be heard in the state or federal …
eBay
· eBay User Agreement
if Section 19.B.7 ("Batch Arbitration") of this Agreement to Arbitrate is found under the law to be invalid or unenforceable then, in that case, the entire Agreement to Arbitrate shall be void...
You and we agree to abide by this Batch Arbitration provision in the event that: (a) there are twenty-five (25) or more individual arbitration demands of substantially similar nature filed... (b) such arbitration demands are filed with the assistance of …
If twenty-five (25) or more similar individual arbitration demands are brought...the parties shall select twelve (12) individual arbitration demands (six (6) per side) for arbitration to proceed ("Bellwether Arbitrations").
Users cannot bring legal claims against Hims & Hers in court; all disputes are channeled to a private, confidential arbitration process before a single arbitrator selected from a specified forum.
Binding arbitration removes the user's ability to litigate disputes in court and applies to the broadest possible scope of claims, including those outside the direct use of the services.
Binding arbitration forecloses access to court as the default forum for disputes, with only limited exceptions preserved.
The notice signals that substantive dispute-resolution rights—including the right to litigate in court and join class actions—are affected by Section 14, and that an opt-out mechanism exists.
Fastly
· Fastly Privacy Policy
Binding arbitration is a legally enforceable dispute resolution mechanism; this clause establishes it as a final recourse for unresolved DPF complaints, which affects the forum and finality of any resolution.
Indeed
· Indeed Privacy Policy
Binding arbitration forecloses court litigation for covered residual claims, and its availability is limited to conditions and claim types not defined in this excerpt.
Oura
· Oura Privacy Policy
Binding arbitration is a final, legally enforceable dispute resolution mechanism, meaning unresolved complaints under the Data Privacy Frameworks have a defined path to resolution outside of court.
Under certain conditions, it may be possible for you to invoke binding arbitration for complaints regarding DPF compliance not resolved by any of the other DPF mechanisms.
Binding arbitration is available only after other DPF complaint mechanisms are exhausted and only when certain unspecified conditions are met, limiting when this remedy can be used.
Okta
· Okta Privacy Policy
Binding arbitration is a final dispute resolution mechanism; its availability only under certain conditions and only for residual claims limits when users can invoke it.
Fitbit
· Fitbit Privacy Policy
Users covered by the DPF framework have access to a binding arbitration mechanism as a last resort, but only in certain circumstances and only for complaints that other means have failed to resolve.
If neither Salesforce nor these authorities resolve your complaint, you may have the possibility to engage in binding arbitration through the DPF Panel.
Binding arbitration is a last-resort mechanism available only after both TaskRabbit and JAMS have failed to resolve the complaint, and only under unspecified qualifying circumstances, which constrains when users can invoke it.
Binding arbitration is a formal dispute resolution mechanism that results in an enforceable decision, providing a concrete remedy path for unresolved DPF Principle violations.
In certain circumstances, if your complaint has not been resolved after first raising it with Postman, Inc., following the JAMS procedure above, and taking certain other steps, complaints may be resolved through binding arbitration, as described in Annex I of …
For any DPF disputes that cannot be resolved by the methods above, you may be able to invoke a binding arbitration process under certain conditions.
If JAMS is unable to resolve your concern, you may have the right to invoke binding arbitration under certain conditions.
The claim establishes that binding arbitration is available only as a last resort, after two prior resolution steps have failed, limiting when this right can be exercised.
Binding arbitration is a conditional and framework-governed last-resort mechanism, meaning access to it is not guaranteed and depends on satisfying specified conditions.
Waiving the right to litigate in court removes users' access to judicial processes, including jury trials, and constrains where and how disputes with Khan Academy can be resolved.
Binding individual arbitration displaces court litigation for virtually all disputes with Wix, fundamentally changing how and where users can seek redress.
Mandatory binding arbitration eliminates access to court adjudication for all disputes or claims under the Agreement, restricting both parties to the arbitral process.
By mandating exclusive arbitration, Skillshare removes access to court litigation for all covered disputes, binding users to a private resolution process.