“If your DFP complaint cannot be resolved through the above channels, you may invoke binding arbitration for residual claims not fully or partially resolved by other redress mechanisms.”
This analysis describes what Fastly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Binding arbitration is a legally enforceable dispute resolution mechanism; this clause establishes it as a final recourse for unresolved DPF complaints, which affects the forum and finality of any resolution.
Interpretive note: The excerpt uses 'DFP' in one place and 'DPF' by context; the canonical claim uses 'DPF' as the evident correct term. The scope of 'residual claims' and the specific arbitration rules are not defined in this excerpt.
Readers with unresolved DPF complaints have the option to invoke binding arbitration, but only for claims that other redress mechanisms have not fully or partially resolved.
How other platforms handle this
...and (ii) injunctive or other equitable relief to stop unauthorized use or abuse of the Services or intellectual property infringement or misappropriation.
if we make any amendment to this Arbitration Agreement...in the future, that amendment shall not apply to any claim that was filed in a legal proceeding against Anyscale prior to the effective date of the amendment.
either you or Target may bring or take an individual claim in or to a small claims court...you agree that you or Target may bring suit in a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin infringement or other misuse of intellectual property rights...
"If your DFP complaint cannot be resolved through the above channels, you may invoke binding arbitration for residual claims not fully or partially resolved by other redress mechanisms.Excerpt from Fastly's Privacy Policy
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Binding arbitration is a legally enforceable dispute resolution mechanism; this clause establishes it as a final recourse for unresolved DPF complaints, which affects the forum and finality of any resolution.
Readers with unresolved DPF complaints have the option to invoke binding arbitration, but only for claims that other redress mechanisms have not fully or partially resolved.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Fastly.