Provision Registry

128 classified provisions across 299 platforms — browse, filter, and compare.

Every clause classified by type, severity, and platform. Updated as policies change.

Start Compliance free trial Track specific clauses across platforms with provision-level alerts.
Filtering: Legal jurisdiction × Low × Clear all
low Legal jurisdiction
Noom · Noom Terms of Service
New York governing law means consumer protections under your home state's laws may not apply, and pursuing litigation would require engaging with New York courts even if you live in another state or country.
CA-P-001842 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Dun & Bradstreet · D&B Terms of Use
Users outside New Jersey, including international users, are required to litigate in New Jersey under New Jersey law, which may create a practical barrier to pursuing legal claims against D&B.
CA-P-008416 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Whatnot · Whatnot Terms of Service
This clause establishes California as the governing law and Los Angeles County as the exclusive venue for any litigation not subject to arbitration, which may create a practical barrier for users located outside California who need to pursue court proceedings.
CA-P-006747 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Pika · Pika Terms of Service
If you have a dispute that falls outside of arbitration, you would need to litigate in California courts under California law, which may be impractical for users who live in other states or countries.
CA-P-007570 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Together AI · Together AI Terms of Service
Users outside California who have disputes not subject to arbitration must litigate in San Francisco courts, which may create practical and financial barriers to pursuing claims.
CA-P-009935 First tracked May 11, 2026 Last seen May 20, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
OpenAI · OpenAI Business Terms
This provision establishes California law and California courts as the exclusive legal framework for non-arbitrated disputes, which may affect users in other US states and internationally, as it requires litigation in a specific forum.
CA-P-010576 First tracked May 11, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Google · Google Terms of Service
The provision designates the substantive law and procedural forum that will apply to contractual disputes and claims, establishing which jurisdiction's courts have authority to hear cases and which state or national legal framework governs the interpretation of the agreement.
CA-P-000129 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Apple Pay · Apple Media Services Terms
The governing law selection determines which state's substantive legal standards apply to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement. The exclusive jurisdiction clause concentrates all dispute resolution in a specified venue, establishing the procedural forum for any claims.
CA-P-000207 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 9, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Revolut · Revolut Terms of Service
Governing law and jurisdiction clauses affect where and how you can bring a complaint or legal claim against Revolut, and which country's consumer protection laws apply to your account.
CA-P-007399 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Spotify · Spotify Terms and Conditions
Governing law provisions establish the legal framework for contract interpretation and dispute resolution. By designating New York law, the clause creates a uniform legal standard for how the terms operate and how disputes are evaluated, rather than applying the laws of the user's own jurisdiction.
CA-P-000323 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 17, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Cerebras · Cerebras Terms of Service
Users outside California, including international users and businesses in other U.S. states, are required to resolve disputes in a California court, which may be geographically and financially impractical.
CA-P-007498 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Target · Target Terms and Conditions
Designating Minnesota law as governing means consumers from other states, particularly those with stronger consumer protection laws like California, may find that the choice-of-law clause limits application of those protections, though courts in consumer's home states do not always honor such designations.
CA-P-010278 First tracked May 11, 2026 Last seen May 20, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
OpenRouter · OpenRouter Terms of Service
This provision establishes the legal framework and forum for all disputes not subject to arbitration. The California governing law designation engages California consumer protection statutes, including the CCPA, as potentially applicable to all users regardless of their geographic location.
CA-P-012774 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Gusto · Gusto Terms of Service
Employer-customers outside California who have disputes not covered by the arbitration clause must litigate in California courts, which may be impractical or expensive for businesses in other states.
CA-P-007970 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 20, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Together AI · Together AI Terms of Service
This provision establishes California law as the governing framework and requires court proceedings to be filed in San Francisco County, creating a geographic requirement that may affect users located outside California who need to pursue court-based remedies.
CA-P-012978 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
OpenSea · OpenSea Terms of Service
This provision requires users outside of New York to submit to New York court jurisdiction for non-arbitrated disputes, which may create practical barriers to litigation for users located in other U.S. states or internationally.
CA-P-012550 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Fastly · Fastly Terms of Service
The governing law and venue selection mechanism determines which jurisdiction's substantive law applies to the agreement and restricts the geographic location where disputes must be litigated, which affects procedural costs and applicable legal standards.
CA-P-005008 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
GitHub · GitHub Terms of Service
This clause establishes the legal framework under which the agreement is interpreted and enforced, and designates the specific courts responsible for adjudicating disputes. It prevents parties from pursuing claims in other jurisdictions or under other governing law principles.
CA-P-009326 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Indeed · Indeed Terms of Service
Requiring litigation in Texas creates a practical barrier for users outside Texas who want to pursue claims in court, effectively raising the cost and complexity of any legal action not resolved through arbitration.
CA-P-007647 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Acorns · Acorns Terms of Service
The governing law selection determines which state's substantive law applies to disputes, contract interpretation, and liability allocation under the agreement. This choice affects the legal framework through which the terms are construed and enforced.
CA-P-006726 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Terms of Use
Governing law provisions establish the legal framework for interpreting contractual obligations and resolving disputes. By designating Delaware law, Netflix establishes a consistent legal standard for all users regardless of location, while the carve-out for mandatory state consumer protections ensures that local statutory protections remain enforceable.
CA-P-003910 First tracked Apr 28, 2026 Last seen Apr 28, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Account and Content Policies
The governing law designation determines which jurisdiction's legal framework applies to interpretation and enforcement of the terms. The carve-out for mandatory consumer protections means that protections under a user's local law that cannot be waived contractually remain enforceable notwithstanding the Singapore law designation.
CA-P-000360 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 12, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Terms of Use
The governing law designation means that in the absence of conflicting mandatory local law, disputes are interpreted under Singapore law, which may differ from the law a user's home country would apply.
CA-P-002275 First tracked Apr 5, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
NotebookLM · Google Generative AI Terms
This provision establishes a layered agreement structure where the generative AI terms govern in cases of conflict, meaning users of NotebookLM are subject to both the standard Google Terms of Service and these additional terms, and should review both documents to understand the full scope of their agreement.
CA-P-011911 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Max · Max Terms of Use
Language accessibility of terms determines the extent to which non-English speakers can access the full text of their contractual obligations. This provision has operational significance for how the company communicates the scope and limits of the service agreement across its user base.
CA-P-001774 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Roblox · Roblox Privacy Policy
This provision creates a hierarchy within the policy document that makes the regional addenda operative for users in covered jurisdictions, which is relevant to assessing the effective rights of users in high-enforcement regions such as the EEA and California where the addenda may confer rights beyond or different from the general policy.
CA-P-012805 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Garmin · Garmin Terms of Use
A single disclaimer page deployed across dozens of jurisdictions may not satisfy all applicable local legal requirements for accuracy disclosures, consumer protection, or data privacy in each market.
CA-P-008228 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Gemini · Gemini User Agreement
The NMLS registration disclosure serves an operational governance function by making users aware of Gemini's regulatory licensing status and the compliance framework under which the entity operates. This disclosure establishes transparency regarding the regulatory oversight applied to the platform's money transmission or financial services activities.
CA-P-000547 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Mistral AI · Mistral Terms of Use
Partners building on Mistral's platform are subject to distinct contractual obligations that may affect how they can use, distribute, or monetize Mistral's AI capabilities within their own products.
CA-P-004925 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Max · Max Terms of Use
The breadth of regional coverage means Max is subject to a wide range of consumer protection and data privacy regimes, and users in each region should review their specific terms rather than assuming uniform protections apply.
CA-P-009738 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Monitor specific governance provisions across platforms.

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Start free Start Compliance free trial