Together AI · Together AI Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Jurisdiction

Low severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 201 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Together AI recorded 2 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Together AI Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

California law governs the agreement, and for any disputes that go to court rather than arbitration, the case must be heard in San Francisco, California.

This analysis describes what Together AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Users outside California who have disputes not subject to arbitration must litigate in San Francisco courts, which may create practical and financial barriers to pursuing claims.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Users located outside California who have claims not resolved through arbitration must pursue them in San Francisco courts under California law, which may impose geographic and cost barriers on out-of-state users.

How other platforms handle this

Cloudflare Medium

These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...

MetaMask Medium

These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...

Target Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Together AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
These Terms are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. You and Together AI agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in San Francisco, California for any disputes not subject to arbitration.

— Excerpt from Together AI's Together AI Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Forum selection and choice-of-law clauses are generally enforceable in commercial contracts but may face challenges in consumer contracts where they impose significant hardship. Some states have statutes protecting consumers from out-of-state forum selection clauses. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low to Medium. The governing law and forum selection provisions are standard for California-headquartered technology companies and are generally enforceable in B2B contexts. Consumer enforceability may vary by state. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Courts in some states have declined to enforce forum selection clauses in consumer contracts where the designated forum is unreasonably burdensome. EU consumer protection law generally entitles EU consumers to bring claims in their home jurisdiction regardless of contractual forum selection. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers outside California should note the San Francisco forum requirement and assess whether their standard vendor agreements require local jurisdiction or governing law provisions. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations operating in multiple jurisdictions should assess whether California law provides adequate consumer protection coverage for their user populations or whether additional local law considerations apply.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State attorneys general may evaluate forum selection clauses in consumer contracts that impose hardship on out-of-state consumers under applicable state consumer protection law.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Together AI Terms of Service
Entity
Together AI
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 30, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-009935
Document ID
CA-D-00477
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
63f8dca020e889c8ab76df9e47ac196882a8627d9205ebdeef9e8f419a6afb27
Analysis generated
April 30, 2026 07:40 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Together AI
Document: Together AI Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-009935
Captured: 2026-04-30 07:40:43 UTC
SHA-256: 63f8dca020e889c8…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/together-ai/together-ai-terms-of-service/governing-law-and-jurisdiction/
Accessed: June 10, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Together AI's Governing Law and Jurisdiction clause do?

Users outside California who have disputes not subject to arbitration must litigate in San Francisco courts, which may create practical and financial barriers to pursuing claims.

How does this clause affect you?

Users located outside California who have claims not resolved through arbitration must pursue them in San Francisco courts under California law, which may impose geographic and cost barriers on out-of-state users.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 201 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Together AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Together AI.