Dun & Bradstreet · D&B Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Jurisdiction

Low severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 201 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Dun & Bradstreet recorded 5 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Dun & Bradstreet Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Any legal dispute about D&B's website terms must be resolved under New Jersey law and in New Jersey courts, regardless of where you are located.

This analysis describes what Dun & Bradstreet's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Users outside New Jersey, including international users, are required to litigate in New Jersey under New Jersey law, which may create a practical barrier to pursuing legal claims against D&B.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the forum selection clause for consumer users varies by jurisdiction; EU and UK consumer protection frameworks may override the clause for users in those regions.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jun 6, 2026

The updated Terms of Use no longer include explicit language describing cookie preferences, consent options (Agree and Proceed, Required Only, Manage Choices), or chat functionality data collection requirements. Previously, the document stated that users could manage cookies or enable chat functionality through specific settings. This removal means users navigating the website will not find these disclosures in the Terms of Use itself, though cookie and chat functionality may continue to operate according to the Cookie Policy, which remains referenced separately.

View change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If you have a legal dispute with D&B arising from these website terms, you agree to resolve it in New Jersey courts under New Jersey law, which may be inconvenient or costly if you are located elsewhere; some jurisdictions, particularly in the EU and UK, may not enforce forum selection clauses that disadvantage consumers.

How other platforms handle this

Cloudflare Medium

These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...

MetaMask Medium

These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...

Target Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Dun & Bradstreet has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
These Terms of Use and your use of the Dun & Bradstreet Site shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of New Jersey, without giving effect to its conflict of law provisions. For purposes of any action arising under these Terms of Use, you and Dun & Bradstreet consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of and venue in the state or federal courts in the state of New Jersey.

— Excerpt from Dun & Bradstreet's D&B Terms of Use

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Forum selection clauses designating New Jersey courts and law are standard in commercial agreements for companies headquartered in New Jersey. However, for consumer-facing disputes, courts in multiple US states and in the EU and UK may decline to enforce forum selection clauses that create a practical barrier to consumer access to justice. EU Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair contract terms and UK consumer contract regulations may render forum selection clauses against consumers in those jurisdictions unenforceable. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low for B2B users in the US. Medium for consumer users or international users, where the enforceability of the clause is less certain and may require jurisdiction-specific analysis. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK consumer protection frameworks may override forum selection clauses in consumer contracts, allowing consumers to litigate in their home jurisdiction. California's consumer protection statutes have been applied to limit the enforceability of forum selection clauses in certain consumer contexts. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers in the US should incorporate this forum selection clause into their risk assessment for disputes with D&B. International procurement teams should assess whether New Jersey forum selection is acceptable in their commercial context or whether product-specific agreements provide more favorable dispute resolution terms. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams in EU and UK-based organizations should assess whether the forum selection clause is enforceable against their entities under applicable consumer or commercial law, and whether disputes under product agreements are governed by different jurisdiction provisions than these website terms.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State attorneys general may assess whether forum selection clauses in consumer-facing terms of service create unfair access-to-justice barriers under applicable state consumer protection law
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
D&B Terms of Use
Entity
Dun & Bradstreet
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 7, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-008416
Document ID
CA-D-00721
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
abc8db70fa24c9ad38a827e89bfea22df9377d77e7dec7fde906b2f3fef72549
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 19:09 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Dun & Bradstreet
Document: D&B Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-008416
Captured: 2026-05-07 19:09:58 UTC
SHA-256: abc8db70fa24c9ad…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/dun-bradstreet/db-terms-of-use/governing-law-and-jurisdiction/
Accessed: June 28, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Dun & Bradstreet's Governing Law and Jurisdiction clause do?

Users outside New Jersey, including international users, are required to litigate in New Jersey under New Jersey law, which may create a practical barrier to pursuing legal claims against D&B.

How does this clause affect you?

If you have a legal dispute with D&B arising from these website terms, you agree to resolve it in New Jersey courts under New Jersey law, which may be inconvenient or costly if you are located elsewhere; some jurisdictions, particularly in the EU and UK, may not enforce forum selection clauses that disadvantage consumers.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 201 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Dun & Bradstreet?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Dun & Bradstreet.