Legal disputes about these terms are governed by Minnesota law, regardless of where you live in the United States.
This analysis describes what Target's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Designating Minnesota law as governing means consumers from other states, particularly those with stronger consumer protection laws like California, may find that the choice-of-law clause limits application of those protections, though courts in consumer's home states do not always honor such designations.
Interpretive note: The exact governing law clause text was not fully visible in the truncated document; the Minnesota designation is inferred from Target's known corporate domicile and standard practice, and its enforceability against consumers in states with strong consumer protection frameworks is jurisdiction-dependent.
California customers using Target's same-day delivery service will now pay a CA Shipt Shopper Benefit Fee in addition to standard delivery costs, according to the updated terms. The terms do not specify the fee amount, structure, or whether it applies to all same-day orders or only certain product categories. Consumers in California should review their receipt or account details to understand the exact fee amount and whether it was previously being charged but undisclosed, or if this represents a new charge.
View change record →Target removed specific language that explained how Target Circle Bonus rewards are earned, calculated, and reflected in customer accounts across different purchase methods (online, in-store, Same Day Delivery, Order Pickup, Drive Up). Previously, the terms clarified that online orders counted as one transaction unless they included Target Plus items or used Same Day Delivery, and specified timing for when bonuses would appear (24 hours for in-store, upon shipment/pickup/delivery for online). Without this clarity, customers must now rely on in-app displays or support channels to understand exactly how their purchases contribute to bonus eligibility, which may create confusion about reward calculation or disputes over earned benefits.
View change record →Target's updated Terms and Conditions now include explicit governance for its Target Circle loyalty program and Target Circle 360 membership. The updated terms establish that membership is voluntary and that by joining or continuing to use the program, members agree to Target Circle-specific terms and the Privacy Policy in effect at that time. The terms authorize Target to update the Target Circle Terms, the Target App, or the website at any time without advance notice, with continued program participation constituting acceptance of those updates. You can choose not to join Target Circle or can stop participating in the program to avoid binding yourself to these updated terms.
View change record →Consumers outside Minnesota may find that Target asserts Minnesota law applies to any dispute, which could limit access to stronger state-specific consumer protections, though courts in some states may independently apply local consumer protection law regardless of this designation.
How other platforms handle this
These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...
These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...
These Terms of Service and any action related thereto will be governed by the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of law provisions.
Monitoring
Target has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without regard to its conflict of law provisions.— Excerpt from Target's Target Terms and Conditions
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Choice-of-law provisions are generally enforceable in commercial contracts but face scrutiny in consumer contexts where the designated state's law provides materially fewer protections than the consumer's home state. California, Illinois, and New York courts have in various contexts declined to apply out-of-state choice-of-law provisions where doing so would deprive consumers of fundamental state law protections under CLRA, UCL, or analogous statutes. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The Minnesota choice-of-law designation is a standard corporate practice for a Minnesota-headquartered company, but it creates compliance complexity for multi-state operations, particularly where California, Illinois, or New York consumer protection statutes apply extraterritorially or where courts decline to honor the designation. JURISDICTION FLAGS: California presents the highest exposure; California courts frequently apply California consumer protection law (CLRA, UCL, CCPA) to California residents regardless of contractual choice-of-law provisions. Illinois and New York similarly have consumer protection frameworks that courts may apply to protect home-state residents. The CCPA's protections for California residents are largely non-waivable by contract. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Vendors and partners contracting through Target's platform should confirm which governing law applies to their specific agreements, as Target's general terms may not control vendor-specific contracts. B2B partners should conduct independent choice-of-law analysis for any dispute resolution provisions in their agreements. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should maintain a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction map of which state consumer protection laws may apply to Target's digital consumer interactions despite the Minnesota choice-of-law designation. Regulatory notifications required by California (CCPA), Illinois, or New York law are not displaced by this provision and must be independently managed.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Designating Minnesota law as governing means consumers from other states, particularly those with stronger consumer protection laws like California, may find that the choice-of-law clause limits application of those protections, though courts in consumer's home states do not always honor such designations.
Consumers outside Minnesota may find that Target asserts Minnesota law applies to any dispute, which could limit access to stronger state-specific consumer protections, though courts in some states may independently apply local consumer protection law regardless of this designation.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Target.