This provision establishes the mechanism and timeline by which the contractual agreement between OpenAI and users may be unilaterally altered. It creates an operational requirement for advance notification of material modifications while permitting service terms to evolve without requiring affirmative user re-consent beyond continued service use.
Auth0
· Auth0 Terms of Service
The provision establishes a mechanism by which the contractual agreement between Auth0 and users can be altered by Auth0 without requiring affirmative user consent. This creates an operational framework where the terms governing the service relationship are subject to change at Auth0's discretion, with notice provided through document dating and optional supplementary communication.
This clause establishes the procedural framework for unilateral modification of the contractual relationship and specifies the notice mechanisms and acceptance method. It creates an ongoing consent structure where users' continued service use operates as affirmative acceptance of term revisions.
This provision establishes the operational framework through which the Agreement may be updated without requiring affirmative user consent, instead relying on constructive acceptance through continued use. The mechanism allows the service provider to alter contractual obligations and service conditions without bilateral renegotiation.
The clause operationalizes Cash App's ability to update governing terms while establishing procedural obligations for notifying users of those modifications, which determines how contractual changes take effect and when users are informed.
This clause establishes the mechanism and timeline by which the service provider may alter the contractual terms governing the relationship. It creates a structured notice period for existing users while establishing different effective dates based on user status.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual relationship may be unilaterally altered by the service provider, with notice requirements for material modifications but no requirement for explicit user consent to changes. It shifts the burden of contract modification from mutual agreement to continued use as the acceptance mechanism.
Fly.io
· Fly.io Terms of Service
Customers may not receive direct notification of material changes and could find themselves bound by new terms they were not actively informed of, simply by continuing to use the service.
This provision establishes the operational framework governing how contractual terms evolve during the service relationship. It creates an asymmetric modification mechanism where the platform operator retains unilateral authority to alter terms while users retain the discrete option to terminate their account in response to changes.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual relationship can be altered without mutual agreement, shifting the burden to users to affirmatively cease using the service if they reject proposed modifications. The provision creates a system where notification occurs prior to material changes, but acceptance is deemed through continued service usage.
Miro
· Miro Terms of Service
This clause establishes Miro's authority to alter contractual terms without mutual agreement, with material modifications subject to notification requirements but acceptance triggered by continued use rather than affirmative consent.
This clause means the terms you originally agreed to may change without requiring your active re-consent, and continued use of the service after a change is treated as acceptance even if you were unaware the terms were updated.
The terms authorize Datadog to modify these terms at any time without prior notice to users, and treat continued use of the website as acceptance of any changes, which may limit users' ability to meaningfully review and respond to material amendments.
Target
· Target Terms and Conditions
This provision establishes Target's unilateral authority to alter contractual terms during the term of the agreement. The operational effect is that the Terms governing the user-service relationship remain subject to modification by Target rather than being fixed.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which Poshmark exercises contractual modification authority without requiring affirmative consent from users. It places the burden of awareness on users to monitor for posted changes and creates a constructive acceptance framework whereby inaction triggers contractual amendment.
Yelp
· Yelp Terms of Service
This clause establishes Yelp's unilateral authority to alter contractual terms without requiring advance user consent or opt-in. It establishes that the governing terms are the versions in effect at each moment of service access rather than the version accepted at initial signup.
This provision establishes the mechanism through which the service agreement remains subject to modification during the term of the customer relationship. It specifies that notice and continued use function as the acceptance mechanism for amended terms rather than requiring affirmative assent.
This provision establishes the operational framework by which the contractual agreement between Anthropic and users can be unilaterally updated. It creates a procedural pathway for term modifications while setting specific notice and waiting period requirements that define when changes become binding.
This provision establishes the operational mechanism by which the service provider may modify contractual obligations during the term of service. The clause creates a framework where service modifications become binding upon continued use rather than requiring separate affirmative consent to each amendment.
This clause establishes the procedural framework governing how the service agreement can be amended unilaterally. The provision creates a notice requirement for material modifications while reserving to the entity the authority to define materiality, which affects the temporal and substantive scope of user notification obligations.
Twilio
· Twilio Terms of Service
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism through which Twilio may revise contractual obligations and service terms, with notice requirements creating a structured interval for users to review changes before they become effective. The provision addresses how contractual modifications bind parties in an ongoing service relationship.
This provision enables the service operator to alter contractual obligations, service scope, data practices, and dispute resolution procedures without requiring affirmative user agreement or opt-in. The operational consequence is that the governing terms governing the relationship are subject to unilateral change rather than mutual modification.
DocuSign
· DocuSign Terms and Conditions
This clause establishes the procedural framework through which the contractual agreement between DocuSign and users can be modified without individual renegotiation. The provision conditions continued access to services on acceptance of updated terms through a notice-and-continued-use mechanism rather than requiring explicit affirmative consent.
This provision establishes Squarespace's unilateral authority to alter contractual obligations without requiring separate affirmative consent, with notice provided through website posting and optional additional notification methods. The mechanism ties acceptance to ongoing service use rather than explicit user action.
This clause establishes OpenAI's authority to unilaterally alter the contractual obligations, restrictions, and authorizations that govern the service relationship. The provision operationalizes how changes to the governing agreement become effective without requiring affirmative user consent.
This clause establishes the operational mechanism by which the contractual relationship can be modified without negotiation. It shifts the burden of responding to term changes to the user, as non-action results in automatic acceptance of new terms.
This provision establishes the mechanism by which the agreement remains subject to unilateral modification by Waze without requiring affirmative user consent to each change. It creates a binding effect through continued service use rather than explicit agreement to amendments.
This provision establishes the mechanism by which the contractual obligations governing the service relationship can be altered without requiring affirmative consent from users. It defines the procedural requirements (notice and review opportunity) that apply when material modifications are made.
This clause establishes the procedural framework governing how the contractual relationship between Mixpanel and users may be altered during the service period. It creates an operational mechanism whereby the governing terms are subject to change based on Mixpanel's discretion rather than mutual agreement.
T-Mobile
· T-Mobile Terms and Conditions
Your monthly costs or service conditions could change during your agreement period, and continued use of your phone is treated as acceptance even if you did not actively agree to the new terms.