This cap means that even if Glassdoor's actions cause significant harm, such as a data breach or unlawful account termination, your financial recovery is severely limited regardless of the actual loss suffered.
If an outage or error causes you financial harm beyond a direct transaction loss, such as a missed payment penalty or investment loss, you may not be able to recover those damages from the bank.
This provision limits the categories of damages users may recover from Coursera in the event of platform failures, data loss, unauthorized access, or third-party misconduct on the platform. The carve-out for applicable law means the limitation may not apply in full in jurisdictions that restrict such exclusions for consumer contracts.
Square
· Square Terms of Service
If a Square service outage prevents a merchant from processing payments during a busy period, or if a security breach exposes customer payment data, the limitation of liability clause means merchants may have very limited financial recourse against Square for resulting losses.
This provision allocates the burden of agreement acceptance to continued user conduct rather than explicit consent. It establishes that the agreement terms apply through the operational mechanism of service use, which affects how the contractual relationship is formed and modified.
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Klaviyo's exposure to any individual claim, meaning users cannot recover damages exceeding their annual platform spend regardless of the nature or magnitude of any harm attributable to the service.
The agreement excludes a broad range of damage categories that are often the most significant in enterprise AI deployment failures, including lost profits, data loss, and business interruption, which limits the practical financial recourse available to licensees.
Miro
· Miro Terms of Service
If Miro's service fails and you lose board content or suffer business disruption, these terms limit the financial remedy available to you, which is particularly relevant for businesses that rely heavily on Miro for active work.
This provision caps Kit's financial exposure to users who experience data loss, service interruption, account suspension, or revenue loss attributable to platform failure or third-party conduct. For users operating paid newsletters or commerce features, the exclusion of lost profits and lost data damages is operationally material given the revenue dependency the platform creates.
The liability cap restricts the financial exposure Midjourney faces in disputes, establishing a ceiling on potential damages that users may recover regardless of the nature or scope of claimed losses. This allocation of financial risk is a material term of the service agreement.
This provision caps Wise's financial exposure for any individual claim, which is particularly relevant for users who experience transaction failures, unauthorized transfers, or incorrect conversions involving amounts that may significantly exceed the liability cap. The exclusion of consequential damages further limits recovery for losses resulting from service failures.
This clause links liability for data processing failures to the broader commercial liability framework in the Google Ads Terms of Service. Advertisers should review those terms to understand the financial cap and exclusions that would apply to claims arising from a data processing incident, as these may limit recovery in the event of a breach or processing failure.
This provision caps the types of damages users can recover from OpenAI in a dispute, which is particularly significant given the mandatory arbitration clause that already limits the forum for such claims.
The clause operationally restricts the financial exposure Synthesia assumes under the agreement by defining maximum recoverable damages and categorically excluding entire classes of damages from liability eligibility. This affects the scope of remedies available through dispute resolution or legal claims.
Poe
· Poe Terms of Service
The agreement limits Quora's financial exposure for harms arising from platform use, which may affect users' practical ability to recover damages in the event of a data breach, service failure, or harm caused by AI-generated content.
If Descript loses your content, its systems fail, or you suffer financial harm from reliance on the platform, these terms significantly restrict your ability to recover damages from the company.
OpenAI
· OpenAI EU Terms of Use
Liability limitation clauses define the maximum financial exposure a company accepts for service failures or harms; under EU law, mandatory consumer protection provisions may override contractual liability caps that fall below statutory minimums.
This clause limits the categories of damages a licensee can recover from DeepSeek in the event the model causes harm, excluding consequential and indirect damages, which are often the most significant losses in AI-related failures.
This cap means that even significant harms caused by the service, including reliance on inaccurate AI outputs, may result in very limited financial recovery, which is especially relevant given the AI context.
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Jasper's liability exposure per claim, which affects the maximum recovery available to users regardless of the nature or magnitude of the harm alleged.
Liability caps in processor agreements affect how much financial recovery is available to a business customer if Perplexity AI's data processing causes harm, such as a security breach or unauthorized disclosure of personal data.
A subscriber who fails to pay or has payment failures may face liability significantly exceeding the original subscription cost, including legal and collection fees.
Cohere
· Cohere SaaS Agreement
The twelve-month fee cap limits Cohere's maximum financial exposure regardless of the severity of a service failure or data incident, which is operationally significant for enterprise customers whose actual losses from a data breach or service outage could substantially exceed fees paid.
This clause means that if Grammarly loses your data, its AI gives you bad advice that causes harm, or the service fails in a way that costs you money, your ability to recover financial compensation through the agreed dispute process is significantly limited.
The clause establishes a categorical exclusion of certain damage categories from Verizon's potential liability exposure. This operates as a limitation on the scope of recoverable damages in disputes related to service provision or agreement breach.
Google
· Google Terms of Service
For free services, this cap effectively limits Google's liability to zero in many scenarios. The clause includes a carve-out for situations where local law does not permit such limitations, which is relevant for EU and UK consumers.
This provision excludes all indirect, incidental, special, consequential, and punitive damages arising from website use or unavailability; this means users generally cannot recover damages for losses such as business disruption or data loss caused by the site.
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure the service provider assumes under the agreement, allocating risk between the parties by establishing predetermined limits on remedies available through dispute resolution regardless of the nature or magnitude of claimed harm.
This provision establishes a broad limitation of Leonardo AI's financial exposure across all categories of indirect harm, which is operationally significant for users who experience data loss, service outages, or content removal that affects commercial workflows. The clause is qualified by applicable law, which may limit its enforceability in consumer-protective jurisdictions.
SoFi
· SoFi Terms of Service
This provision limits the categories of recoverable damages users may assert against SoFi in connection with service disruptions, data events, or other platform failures, though the clause is qualified by the phrase 'to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law,' which preserves statutory rights that cannot be contractually waived.