Provision registry

Every clause, classified and comparable

462 classified provisions across 309 platforms, each clause typed by severity and platform. Browse, filter, and compare. Updated as policies change.

Stay ahead of the changes

Track specific clauses across platforms

Get provision-level alerts and cross-platform comparisons the moment a clause changes.

Filtering: Legal jurisdiction × High × Clear all
Steam · Steam Subscriber Agreement
You and Valve agree that all disputes and claims between you and Valve...shall be commenced and maintained exclusively in any state or federal court located in King County, Washington, having subject matter jurisdiction.
CA-P-029893 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Starbucks · Starbucks Terms of Use
the User irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts in King County, Washington...for purposes of any legal action arising out of or related to the use of the Sites or these Terms...
CA-P-055033 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Riot Games · Riot Games Terms of Service
the exclusive jurisdiction for all disputes that you and Riot Games are not required to arbitrate will be the state and federal courts located in the Los Angeles County, California...
CA-P-038636 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Linear · Linear Terms of Service
The state and federal courts located in New Castle County, Delaware will have exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its formation, interpretation or enforcement.
CA-P-071615 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Stash · Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
By irrevocably fixing jurisdiction, users who live outside New York are required to litigate in New York courts and cannot contest that venue choice.
CA-P-071106 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Skillshare · Skillshare Terms of Service
any legal action or proceeding between Skillshare and you...shall be brought exclusively in a federal or state court of competent jurisdiction sitting in New York, New York
CA-P-034205 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Unreal Engine · Unreal Engine EULA
You and Epic agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of New York County, New York, or, if federal court jurisdiction exists, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
CA-P-059557 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Peloton · Peloton Terms of Service
...exclusive jurisdiction for all Disputes that are not required to be arbitrated will be the state and federal courts located in New York, New York, United States of America, and you consent to the jurisdiction of those courts...
CA-P-033655 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Twitch · Twitch Terms of Service
Any disputes, claims, or causes of action arising out of or in connection with these Terms of Service or your use of the Twitch Services shall be brought and resolved exclusively by the United States District Court for the Northern …
CA-P-025028 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Cash App · Cash App Terms of Service
You agree that any judicial proceedings (other than small claims actions as discussed above) will be brought in and you hereby consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state courts in the City of Oakland and County of …
CA-P-023053 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Rumble · Rumble Terms of Service
The choice of forum is exclusively Rumble's to make between two options, meaning a user cannot independently select a US federal court and must litigate in Toronto unless Rumble elects otherwise.
CA-P-070247 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
GitHub · GitHub Terms of Service
You and GitHub agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the courts located in the City and County of San Francisco, California.
CA-P-036499 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
OneLogin · OneLogin Terms of Service
Users are contractually bound to litigate disputes only in San Francisco courts, regardless of where they are located.
CA-P-072990 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Anthropic · Anthropic API Terms
An exclusive jurisdiction clause requires users to litigate in a specific location regardless of where they are based, which may create significant practical and financial barriers to pursuing a claim.
CA-P-051338 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Anthropic · Claude.ai Terms of Service
Users are contractually required to litigate any disputes in San Francisco courts, which may impose geographic and financial burdens on users located elsewhere.
CA-P-017622 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Anthropic · Anthropic Consumer Terms
Users are contractually bound to litigate any dispute with Anthropic about the Terms only in San Francisco courts, which may impose a significant geographic and financial burden on users located elsewhere.
CA-P-063121 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Zendesk · Zendesk Terms of Service
Customer agrees to submit to the exclusive personal jurisdiction and venue in a court of general jurisdiction in San Francisco County, California.
CA-P-072446 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Databricks · Databricks Terms of Service
Exclusive jurisdiction in San Francisco means users cannot litigate in their local courts and must appear or be represented in a specific geographic forum.
CA-P-046751 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Strava · Strava Terms of Service
Subject to the Section entitled "Dispute Resolution," the parties irrevocably consent to bring any action to enforce these Terms in the federal or state courts embracing San Francisco, California and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction...
CA-P-034726 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Figma · Figma Terms of Service
The sole jurisdiction and venue for any Claims that are not handled by arbitration will be the state and U.S. federal courts located in San Francisco, California, and both parties consent to the jurisdiction of such courts.
CA-P-032178 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Pinterest · Pinterest Terms of Service
the exclusive place of jurisdiction for any claim, dispute, or controversy arising from or in connection with these Terms or the Service is San Francisco County, California, or the United States District Court for the Northern District of California...
CA-P-023856 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
NVIDIA NIM · NVIDIA NIM Terms of Use
The state and federal courts residing in Santa Clara County, California will have exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute or claim arising out of or related to the Agreement, and the parties irrevocably consent to personal jurisdiction and venue in those …
CA-P-062190 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
LinkedIn · LinkedIn User Agreement
all claims and disputes can be litigated only in the federal or state courts in Santa Clara County, California, USA, and you and LinkedIn each agree to personal jurisdiction in those courts.
CA-P-023484 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Egnyte · Egnyte Terms of Service
Any dispute between the parties will be brought exclusively in a court in Santa Clara County and each party irrevocably waives any claim that such court does not have personal jurisdiction over the party.
CA-P-060398 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
YouTube Ads · YouTube Terms of Service
will be litigated exclusively in the federal or state courts of Santa Clara County, California, USA. You and YouTube consent to personal jurisdiction in those courts.
CA-P-022102 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google · Google Terms of Service
These disputes will be resolved exclusively in the federal or state courts of Santa Clara County, California, USA, and you and Google consent to personal jurisdiction in those courts.
CA-P-017409 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
DraftKings · DraftKings Terms of Use
Users are required to litigate all disputes in a specific geographic forum, regardless of where they are located, limiting their practical ability to pursue claims.
CA-P-039504 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Tabnine · Tabnine Privacy Policy
The clause fixes a single mandatory forum in a foreign country for all privacy-related disputes, which may make pursuing a legal claim practically difficult or prohibitively expensive for users located outside Israel.
CA-P-048808 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Waze · Waze Terms of Use
Exclusive jurisdiction in Tel Aviv means users outside Israel must litigate in a foreign country, creating a significant practical barrier to pursuing legal claims against Waze.
CA-P-037966 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Tabnine · Tabnine Terms of Use
The clause mandates a single, exclusive foreign venue for all disputes, preventing users from pursuing claims in their local courts.
CA-P-045671 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Stay ahead of the changes

Governance intelligence across platforms

Monitor specific governance provisions with regulatory mapping and audit-ready analysis.