Provision record
Starbucks · Starbucks Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Exclusive jurisdiction in King County Washington if arbitration void

Common · 264 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Starbucks and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Starbucks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Workday

If any dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration or cannot be heard in small claims court, then the state and federal courts located in Alameda County, California, will have exclusive jurisdiction.

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
If the arbitration agreement is ever deemed unenforceable or void, or a dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration, the User irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts in King County, Washington...for purposes of any legal action arising out of or related to the use of the Sites or these Terms...

Excerpt from Starbucks's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Starbucks Terms of Use
Entity
Starbucks
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006094, captured Aug. 26, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-055033
Document ID
CA-D-000624
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006094)
2262609d121205a03a83ded8d4c262ff46b227a3399d45cf3a6b95fb101c4970
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 01:23 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006094, captured Aug. 26, 2026 (checked Oct. 6, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007623, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Starbucks
Document: Starbucks Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-055033
Version: CA-V-006094
Captured: 2026-08-26 01:07:05 UTC
SHA-256: 2262609d121205a0…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/starbucks/starbucks-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-055033/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-king-county-washington-if-arbitration-void/
Accessed: Oct. 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Starbucks's Exclusive jurisdiction in King County Washington if arbitration void clause do?

The clause states: “If the arbitration agreement is ever deemed unenforceable or void, or a dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration, the User irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts in King County, Washington...for purposes of any legal action arising out of or related to …”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 264 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Starbucks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Starbucks.