Provision record
Waze · Waze Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Exclusive Jurisdiction in Tel Aviv Courts

High confidence Common · 263 of 343 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

Where must any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of, connected with, or relating to the Terms and the Service be brought?
“Any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of, connected with or relating to these Terms and the Service, will be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the competent court in the Tel Aviv district in Israel.”
Version CA-V-004647, captured July 9, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Waze requires that any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of, connected with, or relating to the Terms and the Service be brought under the exclusive jurisdiction of the competent court in the Tel Aviv district in Israel.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Waze and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Waze's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Exclusive jurisdiction in Tel Aviv means users outside Israel must litigate in a foreign country, creating a significant practical barrier to pursuing legal claims against Waze.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Users are required to bring any legal claim against Waze in Tel Aviv district courts in Israel, regardless of where the user is located.

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

Workday

If any dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration or cannot be heard in small claims court, then the state and federal courts located in Alameda County, California, will have exclusive jurisdiction.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of, connected with or relating to these Terms and the Service, will be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the competent court in the Tel Aviv district in Israel.

Excerpt from Waze's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Waze Terms of Use
Entity
Waze
Date stated by the document
July 8, 2026
As printed in Waze’s text (version CA-V-004647), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004647, captured July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-037966
Document ID
CA-D-000322
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004647)
c75b9da35b8a369a40ae64789825fed88beb23222426c4f615f745a18f4fe0e9
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 04:39 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004647, captured July 9, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Waze
Document: Waze Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-037966
Version: CA-V-004647
Captured: 2026-07-09 00:44:49 UTC
SHA-256: c75b9da35b8a369a…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/waze/waze-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-037966/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-tel-aviv-courts/
Accessed: Oct. 18, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Waze's Exclusive Jurisdiction in Tel Aviv Courts clause do?

Exclusive jurisdiction in Tel Aviv means users outside Israel must litigate in a foreign country, creating a significant practical barrier to pursuing legal claims against Waze.

How does this clause affect you?

Users are required to bring any legal claim against Waze in Tel Aviv district courts in Israel, regardless of where the user is located.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 263 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Waze?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Waze.