Provision record
Stash · Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL) · View original document ↗

Exclusive jurisdiction in New York courts

High severity High confidence Explicit document language Common · 268 of 352 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

What does Stash require users to irrevocably submit to?
“Unless otherwise governed by a separate agreement, including, but not limited to, the Arbitration Agreement in the Advisory Agreement (which is incorporated into this Agreement in its entirety if you have entered into an Advisory Agreement), you and we agree and irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and (to the extent it has sufficient matter jurisdiction) of the federal courts in the Southern District of New York with respect to any legal action...”
Version CA-V-004758, captured July 11, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Stash requires users to irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and the federal courts in the Southern District of New York for any legal action.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Stash and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Stash's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

By irrevocably fixing jurisdiction, users who live outside New York are required to litigate in New York courts and cannot contest that venue choice.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If you have a legal dispute with Stash, you are required to bring it exclusively in New York State courts or the Southern District of New York federal courts, and you cannot challenge that venue.

How other platforms handle this

Apple Pay Medium

You and Apple agree to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located within the county of Santa Clara, California, to resolve any dispute or claim arising from this Agreement.

Disney+ Medium

This Agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York and the laws of the United States, without giving effect to any conflict of law principles.

Hilton Medium

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any principles of conflicts of law.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Unless otherwise governed by a separate agreement, including, but not limited to, the Arbitration Agreement in the Advisory Agreement (which is incorporated into this Agreement in its entirety if you have entered into an Advisory Agreement), you and we agree and irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and (to the extent it has sufficient matter jurisdiction) of the federal courts in the Southern District of New York with respect to any legal action...

Excerpt from Stash's Terms of Use (Superseded URL)

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Entity
Stash
Date stated by the document
Feb. 3, 2023
As printed in Stash’s text (version CA-V-004758), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004758, captured July 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-071106
Document ID
CA-D-000416
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004758)
f598fe675130d6459291551a6afc63b7adccedb7380ee9dca4aa83ec8a2cf439
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 14:17 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found verbatim in version CA-V-004758 (checked Oct. 6, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Stash
Document: Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Record ID: CA-P-071106
Version: CA-V-004758
Captured: 2026-07-11 13:46:23 UTC
SHA-256: f598fe675130d645…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stash/stash-terms-of-use-superseded-url/provision/CA-P-071106/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-new-york-courts/
Accessed: Oct. 11, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stash's Exclusive jurisdiction in New York courts clause do?

By irrevocably fixing jurisdiction, users who live outside New York are required to litigate in New York courts and cannot contest that venue choice.

How does this clause affect you?

If you have a legal dispute with Stash, you are required to bring it exclusively in New York State courts or the Southern District of New York federal courts, and you cannot challenge that venue.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 268 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stash?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stash.