Stash · Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL) · View original document ↗

Exclusive jurisdiction in New York courts

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 266 of 352 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Stash Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what Stash's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

By irrevocably fixing jurisdiction, users who live outside New York are required to litigate in New York courts and cannot contest that venue choice.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If you have a legal dispute with Stash, you are required to bring it exclusively in New York State courts or the Southern District of New York federal courts, and you cannot challenge that venue.

How other platforms handle this

Weights & Biases Medium

For any dispute relating to this Agreement, the parties consent to personal jurisdiction and the exclusive venue of the courts in New York County, New York.

Perplexity AI Medium

it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.

Sony PlayStation Medium

Any dispute not subject to arbitration and not initiated in small claims court may be brought by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction in either the Superior Courts for the State of California...or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Stash has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
you and we agree and irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and...of the federal courts in the Southern District of New York with respect to any legal action...

— Excerpt from Stash's Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Entity
Stash
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-071106
Document ID
CA-D-00416
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
f6c4222644d3d4af9e95d5fb5b403d1cb9ec20fb305f60ff15404a69f6490542
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 14:17 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Stash
Document: Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Record ID: CA-P-071106
Captured: 2026-07-12 14:17:51 UTC
SHA-256: f6c4222644d3d4af…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stash/stash-terms-of-use-superseded-url/provision/CA-P-071106/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-new-york-courts/
Accessed: July 12, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stash's Exclusive jurisdiction in New York courts clause do?

By irrevocably fixing jurisdiction, users who live outside New York are required to litigate in New York courts and cannot contest that venue choice.

How does this clause affect you?

If you have a legal dispute with Stash, you are required to bring it exclusively in New York State courts or the Southern District of New York federal courts, and you cannot challenge that venue.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stash?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stash.