Provision record
Databricks · Databricks Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Exclusive Jurisdiction in San Francisco Courts

High confidence Common · 264 of 343 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

What courts must each party submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of?
“each party shall submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in San Francisco, California.”
Version CA-V-006770, captured Sept. 11, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Databricks requires each party to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in San Francisco, California.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Databricks and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Databricks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Exclusive jurisdiction in San Francisco means users cannot litigate in their local courts and must appear or be represented in a specific geographic forum.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

If you have a dispute with Databricks, you are required to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of courts in San Francisco, California.

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

Workday

If any dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration or cannot be heard in small claims court, then the state and federal courts located in Alameda County, California, will have exclusive jurisdiction.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
each party shall submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in San Francisco, California.

Excerpt from Databricks's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Databricks Terms of Service
Entity
Databricks
Date stated by the document
May 25, 2018
As printed in Databricks’s text (version CA-V-006770), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 29, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006770, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-046751
Document ID
CA-D-000459
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006770)
14cd440a1287368639f3ada1eaaef28d07064d526b89efe99dc15ba4fd34bd07
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 02:08 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006770, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Databricks
Document: Databricks Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-046751
Version: CA-V-006770
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:56:38 UTC
SHA-256: 14cd440a12873686…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/databricks/databricks-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-046751/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-san-francisco-courts/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Databricks's Exclusive Jurisdiction in San Francisco Courts clause do?

Exclusive jurisdiction in San Francisco means users cannot litigate in their local courts and must appear or be represented in a specific geographic forum.

How does this clause affect you?

If you have a dispute with Databricks, you are required to submit to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction of courts in San Francisco, California.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 264 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Databricks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Databricks.