Provision record
Peloton · Peloton Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Exclusive Jurisdiction in New York Courts

High severity Explicit document language Common · 266 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Peloton and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF

This analysis describes what Peloton's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
5
Months Monitored
Jul 10, 2026
First Seen
Jul 10, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 1499 other provisions on other platforms.

How other platforms handle this

Datadog Medium

Any legal action or proceeding arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in New York County, New York, USA...

Weights & Biases Medium

For any dispute relating to this Agreement, the parties consent to personal jurisdiction and the exclusive venue of the courts in New York County, New York.

Plaid Medium

the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state and Federal courts located in San Francisco, California

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
...exclusive jurisdiction for all Disputes that are not required to be arbitrated will be the state and federal courts located in New York, New York, United States of America, and you consent to the jurisdiction of those courts...

Excerpt from Peloton's Terms of Service

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Peloton Terms of Service
Entity
Peloton
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 27, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-033655
Document ID
CA-D-00219
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
15e638cbe7e6adbe5f4ab29cf271007895fe70aeb1bfe6ef40b8908e8d06d526
Analysis generated
April 27, 2026 14:32 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Peloton
Document: Peloton Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-033655
Captured: 2026-04-27 14:32:49 UTC
SHA-256: 15e638cbe7e6adbe…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/peloton/peloton-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-033655/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-new-york-courts/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Peloton's Exclusive Jurisdiction in New York Courts clause do?

The clause states: “...exclusive jurisdiction for all Disputes that are not required to be arbitrated will be the state and federal courts located in New York, New York, United States of America, and you consent to the jurisdiction of those courts...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Peloton?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Peloton.